-
US is ___ in dealth penalties
52
-
Furman v. Georgia, 1972
Supreme Court found that states' juries were imposing the death penalty "wantonly and freakishly"; ethnic minorities disproportionally sentenced to death; not enough doc to ensure juries were not biased; death pen is uncon when judges & juries are allowed such discretion
-
Effectively disallowed death penalty due to lack
of procedures for accountability
Furman v. Georgia, 1972
-
Woodson v. NC, 1976
NC attempted to mandate the death penalty for some crimes, but Supreme court ruled that this still violated the 8th amendment
-
Gregg v. Georgia, 1976
Supreme Court upheld death penalty as constitutional; found that states involved (TX, GA, FL) adequately addressed issues from Furman by specifying aggravating circumstances
-
NC de facto moratorium since 2006
NC Med Board declared that physicians could not participate in executions
-
Racial Justice Act (2009)
Allows defendent/inmate to present evidence that racial bias is/was a factor in sentencing; bill has been introduced to house to overturn
-
direct review
same as an appeal (admin of death penalty after sentencing)
-
state collateral review
grounds that could not be raised at trial or on direct review; involves consideration of new evidence outside of trial record & ineffective counsel
-
writ of habeas corpus
"produce the body"; federal lawsuit; apeal to fed govt to ensure that the states have protected the defendent's const rights; can also bring forth new evidence; 21% of cases reversed
-
Section 1983 challenge
Section of Civil Rights Act of 1871; challenge the states' method of execution as cruel and unusual
-
roles for psychologists during death penalty
trial consultancy (assisting with death-qualifying the jury, advising on viability of insanity defense); assessment of mitigating or aggr factors; evaluate competency to be executed
-
Wainwright v. Witt, 1985
jurors can be excluded if their views on capital punishment preclude them from doing their duty as a juror
-
aggravating and mitigating factors
jury has to unanimously agree that one or more aggravating factors were present to impose death penalty
-
Penry v. Lynaugh, 1989
jury instructions that don't ask about mitigating factors regarding mental health violate the 8th amendment
-
aggravating factors
murder of law enforcement; murder after kidnap; murder for hire; murder of >=2 ppl; heinous murder/torture; depravity of mind; risk of further damage to others; history of violence
-
mitigating factors
no sig criminal record; young age; duress/coercion by another; extreme emotion; limited understanding of consequences; any factors defendent believes is mitigating
-
In 2000, NC got rid of parole. Must serve ___ of sentence
85%
-
mitigating & aggravation assessment
interview (mental status exam); testing (neuropsychological, intellectual, personality); records (school, work, military, medical, psychiatric)
-
to be executed, person must:
comprehend they are going to die, understand it is punishment for a crime; primarily assessed through interview
-
Atkins v. Virginia, 2002
excluded defendents with mental retardation from death penalty
-
special considerations for competency to be executed
mental retardation, psychosis, age
-
Stanford v. Kentucky, & Wilkins v. Missouri, 1989
Supreme Court upheld death sentence for a person at least 16 year of age at time of crime
-
Roper v. Simmons, 2003
imposing death penalty on those younger than 18 is cruel and unusual punishment; "evolving standards of decency"
-
syndrome
a group of symptoms that occur together, define a condition or problem, consistent from one person to another, generally interchangeable with disease
-
intimate partner violence
found across all groups (age, race, class, socioeconomic, etc.); women more likely to be victims & men perpetrators
-
factors that increase likelihood of intimate partner violence
poverty, lack of resources, isolation (social & cultural), greater acceptance of gender inequality
-
motive for intimate partner violence
men: est. or maintain control, often serial; women: self-defense, in anticipation or retaliation
-
characteristics of batterers
exp or witnessed battering in childhood; difficulty w/ attachment to others; impulsive; poor social skills; negative cognitions & attitudes (women, gender roles, violence)
-
family only typology of batterer
periodic and precipitated by stress
-
dysphoric/borderline typology of batterer
exhibit mental disorder, substance abuse problems
-
generally violent/antisocial typology of batterer
extensive legal history, substance abuse problem
-
features of battered woman syndrome (BWS)
learned helplessness, low self-esteem, feelings of depression, impaired functioning (survival rather than escape, inability to plan), loss of feeling of safety, fear, terror, anger, rage, inevitability of death, cycle of abuse, high tolerance of cognitive inconsistency, hypervigilence
-
Cycle of abuse:
- Tension-building phase; Acute battering incident; Contrite phase (tends to disappear over time);
- Equivocal empirical evidence; must exp complete cycle at least twice
-
challenges to BWS
may lead others to expect similar reactions from all battered women; may not apply to other cultures (including subcultures within US)
-
Similarity to PTSD
reexperiencing of traumatic event; reduced responsiveness to environ; at least 2: diff falling asleep, irritability or angry outbursts, diff concentrating, hypervigilence, exagg startle response
-
Why not put BWS in DSM?
could be used against women in courty if they dont exhibit all symptoms; stigma; in court, implies that man is guilty
-
Primary reason to introduce BWS as a defense for culpable behavior:
self-defense; insanity
-
success of BWS in court
expert witness increases likelihood of more favorable outcome for defendant: more specific testimony, better outcome, only for self-defense (not insanity)
-
types of abuse
physical (19%), emotional (8%), sexual (10%, girls 4x more likely), neglect (67%)
-
killing an infant younger than 24 hours
neonaticide
-
killing an infant older than 24 hours
filicide
-
post-partum conditions
blues (50-80%), depression (likely to be present before birth), psychosis
-
Munchausen's syndrome by proxy
parent induces medical or psychological symptoms in child in order to get attention; tend to be vague symptoms
-
roles for psychologists during child abuse
evaluation; assessing competency to testify; testifying as expert witness; treatment
-
types of testimony as an expert witness for child abuse
social or research framework; comparing characteristics of kids in the case with those of abuse kids; testimony about credibility
-
Open Discovery Bill (2004)
signed by Gov. Mike Easley; requires prosecutors to share files in all felony cases; defense shares witness lists & details of grounds of defense
-
problematic techniques when interviewing children about abuse
leading questions; confirmation by others; + & - consequences; repetitive questioning; inviting speculation; misinformation
-
State v. Huss, 1993
The presence of suggestible materials can lead to reversal of decision
-
how to improve interviewing of kids
use kid appropriate language; begin w/ open-ended questions & prompt for more details; document all interviews; evaluate credibility objectively
-
guidelines for use of dolls during evaluation
don't use in initial stages of evaluation; mental health profs should be trained; awareness of age, SES, background, etc affect responses; document
-
Child Sexual Abuse Accomodation Syndrome (CSAAS)
takes a victim's retraction of abuse allegations as proof that the abuse occurred
-
memory
acquisition (encoding, input from sensory organs); storage (usually involves repetition); retrieval
-
four points of memory
not everything gets into memory; what goes into memory may vary in strength; memories may change; not all that is stored can be retrieved
-
reconstructive theory of memory
we continually alter & reconstruct our memory of past experiences; memory not like videotape
-
APA's position on child abuse and memory
see notes
-
reasons why child custody may be initiated
separation or divorce; abuse or neglect; death of parent; parents are juveniles; parent incarcerated
-
trained volunteer supported by tthe court who represents theneeds of the child
guardian ad litem
-
roles for psychologists during child custody
therapist, mediator, guardian ad litem, evaluator, consultant to attorney, expert witness, parent coordinator
-
Finlay v. Finlay, 1925
1st articulation of "in the best interest of child" doctrine; moved beyond monetary considerations to psychological; shifts towards mom being awarded custody
-
Tuter v. Tuter, 1938
kids should spend tender years with mom; extension of best interests doctrine
-
Painter v. Bannister, 1966
"psychological parent"; may not be biological parent
-
Uniform Marriage & Divorce Act, 1971, ppl looking at custody evals should consider:
wishes of parent, wishes of child, relationship of child with parents & sibs; child's adjustment to home, school; mental & phy health of all involved
-
Whats involved in the best interests of the child?
nuturing environ, guidance, religious issues, economic issues, stability, emotional attachment, other things
-
fundamental questions for custody evals
see notes
-
special issues in custody
special needs of kid and parents, drug or alcohol abuse, neglect, domestic violence, relocation, alienation, high conflict families
-
what is involved in custody evlauations?
interview all parties; psychological testing; medical & school records; observation
-
materials to collect from adults concerning custody
family history, child behavior checklist, psychiatric/psychological records, med records, etc.
-
adult and child custody interview topics & testing
see notes
-
judge's assumptions about same sex parents
homosexuality=mental illness, lesbians not maternal, relationships w/ partners leave no room for relationships w/ kids, kids at risk
-
Li v. Oregon, 2004
APA filed several amiscus briefs concerning same-sex parenting
-
1 in ___ adults are under some form of correctional supervision
32
-
Two out of __ offenders sent bac to jail within three years
3
-
rights of inmates, based on 8th & 14th amendments
right to treatment and right to refuse treatment
-
Vitek v. Jones, 1980
must have hearing before transferring a prisoner to a hospital
-
Washington v. Harper, 1990
Can force meds on a prisoner for treatment only with a judicial hearing; clearn & convincing evidence
-
highest risk for sexual assualt in prison
non-violent 1st time offenders, youth, gay/transgendered, immigrants
|
|