-
trait psychology is also called
dufferebtuak psychology
-
Theoretical issues (5)
- 1. meaning ful differences between individuals
- 2. cosistency over time
- 3. consistency across situations
- 4. person-situation interaction
- 5. Aggregation
-
Theoretical issues:
Meaningful differneces between individuals
People differ in amounts of traits, and differences can be accurately measured
According to trait psychologists, every personality is the product of a combination of a few basic, primary traits
-
Theoretical issues:
cosistency over time
Research indicates consistency over time for broad traits
Although consistent over time, how a trait is manifested in behavior might change over time
How can there be consistency in a trait if it is known to change with age (e.g., impulsivity)? Focus on the rank order differences between people
-
Theoretical issues:
Consistency accross situations
Trait psychologists traditionally assumed cross-situation consistency
If situations mainly control how people behave, then the existence or relevance of traits questionable
-
Consistency accross situations: Hartshorne and may
Low cross-situation consistency is in honesty, helpfulness, self-control
-
Consistency across situations:
Mischel
Personality psychologists should abandon their efforts to explain behavior with traits, focusing instead on situations
critique encouraged debate in personality psychology about the importance of traits compared to situations in causing behavior
-
Consistency across situations: Situationalism
If behavior varies across situations, then situational differences and not personality traits determine behavior
-
Pearson- situation interaction: 2 possible explanations for behavior
1. Behavior is a function of personality traits
2. Behavior is a function of situation
-
Pearson-situation integration
- Integration: personality and situation interact to produce behavior
- Differences between people make a difference only under certain circumstances
-
Pearson-situation interaction:
situational specificity:
Certain situations can provoke behavior that is out of character for an individual
-
Pearson-situation interaction:
stron situation
Situations in which most people react in a similar way (e.g., grief following loss of loved one)
When situations are weak or ambiguous, personality has its strongest influence
-
Pearson-situation interaction:
2 additional ways personality and situation interact to produce behavior
1. Selection- Tendency to choose or select situations in which one finds oneself, as a function of personality
2. Evocation - Certain personality traits may evoke specific responses from others
3. Manipulation - Various means by which people influence the behavior of others; tactics of manipulation vary with personality
-
Aggregation
- Longer tests are more reliable than shorter ones and are better measures of traits
- Single behavior or occasion may be influenced by extenuating circumstances unrelated to personality
-
Aggregation implies
- - implies that traits are only one influence on behavior
- - implies that traits refer to the person’s average level
-
Carelessness
- Method for detecting such problems is an infrequency scale embedded in test
-Infrequency scale contains items that most people answer in a particular way
-Another method for detecting carelessness is to include duplicate items spaced far apart in the survey—if the person answers the same item differently, this suggests carelessness
-
Faking on questioneaires:
Faking good
Attempt to appear better off or better adjusted than one is
-
Faking on questionnaires:
Fake bad
Attempt to appear worse off or less adjusted than one is
-
How to detect faking on questionnaires:
Method to detect is to a devise scale that, if answered in particular way, suggests faking
-
Response sets:
Acquiescence
Tendency to agree with items, regardless of content; psychologists counteract by reverse-keying some items
-
Response Sets:
Extreme responding
Tendency to give endpoint responses
-
Response sets:
Social desirability
Tendency to answer items in such a way so that one comes across as socially attractive or likable
-
2 views on social disirability
- Represents distortion and should be eliminated or reduced
- Valid part of other desirable personality traits, such as agreeableness, and should be studied
-
Integrity testing
- Integrity tests are surveys designed to assess whether a person is generally honest or dishonest; replaced polygraph
- When assessed against the “big five” personality traits, integrity is the combination of high conscientiousness, high agreeableness, and low neuroticism
-
Personnel selection: choosing the right person for job
Personality tests frequently used to screen out “wrong” individuals from a pool of applicants for police officers
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
California Personality Inventory (CPI)
16 Personality Factor (16PF) Questionnaire
-
Barnum statement
generality that could apply to anyone
-
Range restriction affects correlation
When two variables are correlated with each other, the size of correlation depends, in part, on whether each variable spans full range in the sample
Violation occurs when participants are selected on the basis of one score, and then that score is correlated with another variable on which participants have been measured
Correlation between two variables will shrink as the range of scores on one (or both) variables is restricted
-
Myers-briggs type indicator (MBTI) is the most .............
widely used personality assesment device in a business setting
-
MBTI asses 8 fundamental preferences which reduce to 4 scores:
Extraverted versus introverted
Sensing or intuitive
Thinking or feelings
Judging or perceiving
-
MBTI four scors yeild ........ types of personalities
16
-
MBTI widely used to select appticants for .......... posistions
leadership
-
selection
Tendency to choose or select situations in which one finds oneself, as a function of personality
-
evocation
Certain personality traits may evoke specific responses from others
-
Manipulation
Various means by which people influence the behavior of others; tactics of manipulation vary with personality
|
|