-
Loving v. Virginia 1967
state action
anti-miscegination
- Virginia's statutory scheme to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications held to violate
- Equal Protection
- Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment
-
Dred Scott v. Sanford
- 1857
- Dred Scott ruled not a citizen (no standing to sue in Fed Court)
- Taney further holds M. Compromise unconstitutional
-
Civil Rights Cases
1883
- At issue 1875 Civil Rights Law
- Held that Congress has no authority under 13/14 to enact CRA 1875
- CRA violated Tenth amendment
- 13/14 aimed at state action, not private wrong
- Set the stage for Jim Crow
-
Plessy v. Ferguson
1896
- Held
- 14 intended to address legal wrongs; equality cannot be legislated
- Exercise of police power is reasonable when conformed to social norms
- Separate but equal ruled to be a constitutionally valid standard
-
Shelley v. Kramer
1948
- Private covenants which discriminate are constitutional up to the point at which courts enforce them (constituting state action)
- State action in this regard constiututes denial of equal protection of the laws
- right to own, enjoy, acquire, dispose of property, etc. essential to basic enjoyment of rights under 14th amendment
-
NAACP
- Founded 1909
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored Persons
- express purpose to use the legal system to challenge lynching laws and Jim Crow
- major player in civil rights to this day
-
Jim Crow
- set of laws enacted 1880's on (after Civil Rights Cases 1883) to segregate and discriminate based on skin color mainly in the south
- Established de jure segregation; ostensibly "separate but equal"
-
Uncle Tom's cabin
- 1852
- Harriett Beecher Stowe
- abolitionist novel
- inspires spread of abolitionist movement 1850's
-
Kansas Nebraska Act
- 1854
- Creates Kansas and Nebraska
- Replaces M. Compromise scheme
- Codifies popular sovereignty in statute
- states may choose to be free or slave
- Republican party formed in opposition
-
Fugitive Slave Law
- 1850
- Federal law req. free states to return runaway slaves
-
Missouri Compromise
- 1820
- dealt with prospect of slavery in new territories
- sought maintenance of balance of power b/t N. and S
- forbid slavery north of 36'30"
-
Civil Rights
Positive government action (eg laws) to protect individuals against arbitrary or discrimnatory treatment
-
13th amendment
- December 6th 1865
- outlaws slavery/ involuntary servitude within Jurisdiction of United States
-
14th amendment
i
- all persons born or naturalized are citizens
- states shall not deprive citizens of
- privileges and immunities of us (eg Bill of Rights)
- Due Process of Law
- Equal Protection of laws
-
14th amendment
ii
- repeals 3/5 clause Article One Section ii
- Penalizes states who abridge right to vote by reducing representation by equal proportion
-
14th amendment
iii
- July 9th 1868
- Prohibits Officers/Agents of Confederacy from attaining to office w/o 2/3 consent of congress
-
14th Amendment
iv
Validates Union war debt, invalidates confederate debt
-
15th Amendment
- February 3rd 1870
- Prohibits States from denying right to vote based on race or color
-
US v. Cruikshank
- March 1875
- Bill of Rights not incorporated to states
- 14th amendment applied to state action only, does not give congress power to criminalize individual behavior
-
Pace v. Alabama
Pace v. State
- 1883
- Upheld anti-miscegination in alabama
- Held punishment equal because both the white def and black def were punished equally
-
Cross subsidization
- Incentivization of low level economic activity by the government
- (health care, education)
- Keeps labor costs low
- Mexico/Employers benefit
- Remittances
- Takes pressure off of Mexican system
-
PRI
- Institutional Revolutionary Party
- Single party ruled Mexico for 70+ years (1929-2001)
- Alleged root cause for corruption and stagnation
- Alleged underlying cause of massive emigration to US
-
Berea College v. Kentucky
- 1908
- Separate but equal applies to public schools
-
Bailey v Alabama
- 1910
- 13/14 proscribes states from criminalizing sharecroppers who default or fail to meet obligations of contracts
- holds that statute amounts to establishment of a system of involuntary servitude
-
Buchanan v Warley
- 1917
- state and city imposed residential segregation unconstitutional (14th)
- "elemental to acquire, use, and dispose of property
-
Nixon v. Herndon
- 1927
- exclusion from Democratic Primary constitutes abridgment of suffrage rights under 14th and 15th amendments
- race cannot be a statutory classification
-
Powell v. Alabama
- 1932
- Failure to provide counsel deprives defendants due process (criminal cases)
-
Norris v. Alabama
- 1935
- states cannot systematically assign jurors based on race
-
Brown v. Mississippi
- 1936
- confessions extorted by violence/coercion violates Due Process Guarantee
-
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada
- 1938
- Missouri's failure to provide a law school for African Americans constitutes unequal protection of the laws
- So long as Missouri furnished a law school for whites within in its own borders it must furnish the same consideration to Mr. Gaines
-
Executive Order 9809
- 1946
- Executive Order by Truman created committee on civil rights
-
Shelly v. Kramer
- 1948
- Private Covenants constitutional, but not state enforcement of them; Equal Protection
-
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
- 1950
- State can't treat McLaurin differently once he is in school
- Does not address broader separate but equal issue
-
Sweatt v. Painter
- 1950
- separate law schools that are not substantially equal
- violate equal protection
-
Henderson v. US Interstate Commerce Commission
- 1950
- Equal Protection requires equal treatment on Federally regulated trains
-
Executive Order 10308
- 1951
- Prohibits discrimination in government contracts
-
Brown v. Board of ed. Topeka, KS
I
- 1954
- Held separate but equal per se violates equal protection
- applies to taxpayer funded schools
- Overturns Plessy v. Ferguson
-
Brown v. Board
II
- 1955
- Orders desegregation with all deliberate speed
-
Bowder v. Gale
- 1956
- 14th amendment Equal Protection outlaws separate tax funded bus systems
-
1957 Civil Rights Act
Largely ineffective attempt to secure voting rights for African Americans in the south
-
Cooper v. Aaron
- 1958
- Debunks "nullification" argument and reaffirms Brown under the supremacy clause (Article VI Section ii)
- Governors of states cannot "nullify" Federal Judges rulings or congressional statute
-
George Wallace
- elected Governor GA 1962
- "Segregation Now, Segregation Tomorrow, Segregation Forever..."
-
Craig v. Boren
- 1976
- Liquor laws cannot discriminate based on sex
-
Regents of UC Davis v. Bakke
- 1978
- Affirmative action legal
- not quotas
-
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S.
- 1964
- Congress has right to regulate private activity to promote/protect interstate commerce (Commerce Clause)
- Article I Section 8
-
Harris v. Forklift Systems
- 1993
- Title VII CRA 1964
- Held that a hostile work environment constitutes harassment and discrimination
-
Romer v. Evans
- 1996
- State cannot discriminate against a protected group
- Prop 2 sought to prevent antidiscrimination laws from applying to homosexuals, thus denying them protections others enjoy
- Colorado Amendment doesn't even pass rational basis test (let alone strict scrutiny)
-
Olmstead v. L.C.
- 1997
- undue institutionalization constitutes discrimination under ADA
- lack of funds not an excuse
-
Bowers v. Hardwick
- 1985
- upholds proscription against sodomy in Georgia
- "no constitutional right to engage in sodomy"
- regulation of moral conduct within state police power
- no privacy right to sodomy
-
Lawrence v. Texas
- 2003
- Overturned Bowers v. Hardwickintimate sexual conduct covered by 14 (due process)
-
Gratz v. Bollinger
- 2003
- Undergrad UM admissions quota system ruled unconstitutional (Bakke)
-
Grutter v. Bollinger
- 2003
- UM Law School program constitutional, not a quota system
- pursuit of diversity "compelling state interest"
-
Rational Basis/Minimum Scrutiny
- required for classifications other than protected and quasi suspect
- state must demonstrate a legitimate state purpose
-
Heightened Scrutiny
- Used for quasi suspect classes such as gender
- substantial relationship to an important state interest
-
Strict Scrutiny
- Applys to "suspect classifications"
- shifts burden to the state to show compelling interest
|
|