-
Complicity
liable for someone elses conduct
-
vicarious liability
liability based on relationship
-
accomplice
- participate before or during the offense
- accomplices punished for the crime itself and get the same punishment
-
accessory
participate after the offense
-
conspiracy
agreement to commit the crime
-
vicarious liability
based on relationship
-
corporations cant have
mens rea: must impute intent on manager, some states have strict liability statutes, in that case no intent required
-
Corporations vicarious liability Mens Reus
Relationship between both parties and Act of other party
-
Corporations vicarious liability Mens Rea
Relationship between parties and Purpose, Knowledge, Recklessness, or negligence of other party
-
Individuals vicarious liability
no liability only if created by specific statute
-
parents statute
not vicarious liability, if law punishes parent for act of child it is based on negligent supervision
-
attempt
liability for trying to commit a crime
-
conspiracy
liability for making agreement with someone to commit crime
-
solicitation
liability for trying to get someone else to commit the crime
-
2 rationals for attempt law:
- Dangerous conduct
- Dangerous Person
-
Dangerous Conduct
how close did Def. get to completing the crime
-
Dangerous person
How fully did Def. develpop his criminal purpose
-
2 types of laws:
- General Attempt
- Specific Attempt
-
General Attempt
apply to attempt to commit any crime
-
Specific attempt
define an attempt to commit specific crimes
-
physical proximity
was the defendant close to being successful
-
indispensable element
has the Def. gotten control of everything he needs to complete the crime
-
Dangerous proximity
has the Def. came dangerously close to to completing the crime, looks at the seriousness of the crime, closeness of completion/probability
-
Unequivocality
looks at what the Def. has already done-what are the chances Def. wont continue toward completion
-
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Act speaks for itself
-
Legal impossibility
intent to commit crime, performas all acts to commit crime but no law exists making it a crime-perfect defense
-
Factual impossibility
intent to commit crime, bu extraneous factor interrupts defendant-not a defense
-
Abandonment
1/2 the states accept affirmative defense of abandonment, must not be motivated by fear of getting caught.
-
3 kinds of murder, historically
justifiable,excusable,criminal
-
Murder
malice forethought
-
manslaughter
no prior planning
-
unintended killings
depraved heart, intent to cause bodily harm, and death occured
-
1st degree murder
premeditated, felony, death penalty may be levied but can not be mandatory
-
2nd degree murder
indended and unintended murders
-
felony murder`
unintentional deaths, intent was not to kill, but was to cause bodily harm, usually felony murder must be a dangerous felony
-
corporation murder
corporations can be liable for murder, but are usually sued for manslaughter
-
voluntary manslaughter
killing in the sudden heat of passion, adequate provocation, must be sudden not time to cool off
-
paramour rule
catch a spouse in bed with another you could kill them both
-
involuntary manslaughter
voluntary act but unintentional killing,
-
criminal recklessness
conscious creation of substantial and unjustifiable risk
-
criminal negligence
creating substantial and unjustifiable risk that defendant should have been aware of but wasn't
-
unlawful act manslaughter
unintended death occuring dury any unlawful act...many states have totally abolished this or narrowed the application at common law only applied to unlawful acts which were mala in se-
|
|