Language Patterns

used to put a person in a mild trance qhile they make sense with them. Just take a verb and add: tion, sion, ance, or ize

to get the full effect of linking nominalizations, make an infinitive verb (to be, to run, etc.) your outcome

• Example
• "tell me about the doubts about your ability [to make] a commitment in yourself"

star with a nominalization and connect it with one of three words: of, about or how. Precede to the next nominalization with either your or the. Finish it with an infinitive verb as the outcome.

Example:

Notice the process of your choice to connect powerfyllu in this realtionship

single bind formula: the more (less, etc) that you X, the more that you Y

example:

the more your conciouss mind has that recgonition of quality and sees that it is important (X), the more fluidly you'll find that you'll understand that this is really the proper window frame for this particular wall (Y). Just see it very clearly. I looks great (outcome)

These are tools that hel deliver the message directly to the unconcious mind.

To use them pick a word that can be used as both a noun and averb or a word that has at least 2 different meanings (call this word Pivot Word)

The Punctuation Ambiguity happens when the first part of a sentence seems to use the Pivot Word as a noun and what follows it makes it seem like a verb. This second part of the structure is phrased as a command

Ex

Pivot Word: address

"...you might remember how you found your latest address me with more respect"

debate

Fish

fix

flower

fly

force

free

glue

happen

heat

home

index

land

lead

like

loop

love

make

map

mark

match

mind

microwave

name

open

pay

picture

pile

place

power

reveal

ring

seal

salt

shield

smoke

tease

tie

toss

understand

veil

write

x-ray

• ex: I know what you are thinking
• Just being there, you probably want to smell the leather of these fine
• seats
• You are probably thinking how nice it would be to own this house

Counter with the question: How do you know?

statement that discribes a judgment or a belief or standard w/o describing the authority for saying it

• Ex: It is the lastest fashion
• Everyone loves this
• Decent people dont do that
• We carry the finest wintage in the state

Using it witht he Pace, Pace, Pace, Lead structure:

"you went to the store. You bought this book. You have taken the time to read it so far, and you got in your hand one of the most powerful instructional tools that you have ever purchased"

Counter with: According to whom

This uses default logic. It states that if you do X, Y will happen

Cause and Effect words: because, causes, kindles, creates, leads to, results in, generates

• Ex: just being in this aisle, you'll see some styles you'll want to try on
• the front door will remind you of home

Counter with: Based on what? or According to whom?

This pattern always uses a form of the verb to be -is, am, are.

• Ex: it is a sin against God
• Jim is a jerk
• Understanding these language patterns is true knowledge
• This car is the best

Counter with: Acording to whom

Statements that imply or state absolute conditions as being true. They include words such as: always, never, everyone, and everything.

• Ex: Everyone knows that's wrong
• You never listen to me
• You will always be in style wearing this
• We alwayseat at those places. Lets go somewhere new

Counter by phrasing the universal quantifier in the form of a question: Never? Everybody?

words that suggest something that is necessary or possible to define the boundries of someone's model of the world. At par, they can demonstrate possibilities or capabilities. The include words sucha as: must, have to, got to, need to, can't.

Ex: if you want to live a good life, you must stop your sinful ways.

If they say that they can't do something ask: What if ou could do it?...once you get the agreement with could, you get them to agree that they can. At this point you are only talking about ability. Next you add necessity: you have to do it!

Police example: We know you didn't do it, bout could you do it? Not did you do it, but could you?

They are used to reach a conclusion about something without indicating how you arrived at that conclusion.

• Ex: you're going to be cast out of decent society
• driving this car will make you fell like a king
• working out here will give you the edge

Counter with: exactly how will that happen? What happens first? What is the next step?

this technique allows you to give a simple, easy suggestion or command during a moment of confussion.

To use it, you insert a nonsense sentence or phrase (one out of context) in the middle of a group of other statments that would otherwise make perfect sense. Immediatly follow the nonsense stament with a suggestion or command, then continue with what you were saying before

Ex: this car has grea accelaration yet it still has excellent gas mileage. The power train comes with a five year warranty and the engine has 270 horepower. Dogs pulling bobsleds are trained completly by voice commands. Go ahead and get behind the wheel. The seat has full lumbar support and can be adjusted automatically for each driver...

• "my brother owns this car. he loves it. he and his wife drove to san francisco with it. do birds fly backwards in australia. go ahead and get behind the wheel"

Bypasses the concious mind so you can give direct suggestions and commands to the unconciouss mind. You can create them by marking out the commands with tonality (make your voice go lower and deeper), speed (slower), pace (pause at ...) or body language.

Ex: "it is possible to...learn this language patterns...and with repetition and...practice...gain...some sense of...mastery

the unconcious mind hears: Learn this language patterns. Practice. Gain mastery

For best results make sure you

• 1. determine the outcome
• 2. write a series of commands from one to four, such as, "buy my product"
• 3. make thses comands by pausing...and changing your voice
• 4. Dont just use one hidden directive. Incorporate as many as you can into your proposal or pitch