-
What tools are available to the president?
- executive order
- executive privilege
- chief legislator status
- "presidential persuasion"
- judicial power
- chief politician
-
What is an executive order?
a directive from the president for members of the executive branch to take some sort of action
-
Why does anyone bother with executive orders?
- They have force of law (unless Congress messes with them).
- Ex. Dept of Homeland Security was created by executive order.
-
What is executive privilege?
- A president's claim to privacy
- Protect whatever from interference
- Weakened by US v. Nixon (1974)
-
What does it mean to be chief legislator?
- Gives State of Union Address
- Veto Power
- Can add signing statements
-
What are signing statements?
A statement added to a bill by the president stating how he intends to enforce the bill when he signs it.
-
When does presidential persuasion come in handy?
- divided government
- gridlock
-
What does "divided government" mean?
Majority party of Congress is not the president's party
-
What is "gridlock"?
passing of legislation slows or stops
-
What judicial powers does the president have?
- making appointments to the judiciary
- pardoning folks
- solicitor general
-
Why are 1/10 of judiciary positions vacant?
Presidential appointments are awaiting congressional confirmations
-
Why does the president have pardoning power?
Monarchs had that power.
-
What does the solicitor general do?
- takes up the position of government and arguing before a court
- amicus briefs
-
What are amicus briefs?
arguing for another party in a case
-
What does the president do as chief politician?
- maintain public opinion (approval ratings)
- maintain good communication (effective media use)
-
What are the constitutional requirements for presidency?
- 35 years old
- 14 year resident of the States
- natural born citizen
- electoral college
-
Electors weren't required by law to be chosen by popular vote until
1828
-
-
Where does campaign money come from?
- party
- private donors
- interest groups
-
Where is bureaucracy found in the Constitution?
No where, but it is important in the daily functioning of our lives
-
Patronage/Spoils System
- awarding jobs as political prizes
- spawned rampant corruption
-
What did the Progessive Movement do?
Civil Service Reform
-
Pendleton Act (1883)
officially established the merit system
-
Hatch Act
designed to protect civil servants from political pressure and keep them from using their jobs to influence others
-
Bureaucratic Characteristics
- hierarchical authority
- job specialization
- professionalism
- formalized rules
- specific goals
-
Hierarchical Authority
Everyone has to answer to someone else.
-
Job Specialization
defined division of labor among employees
-
Professionalism
elimination of patronage = qualified employees
-
Formalized Rules
help the organization run smoothly
-
Specific Goals
- both for individual workers and the organization as a whole.
- Ultimate goal: implementing policy
-
-
Cons of Bureaucracy
- Inefficiency
- Unresponsive to change
-
Federal Bureaucracy
- President's Cabinet
- Independent Executive Agencies
- Regulatory Agencies
- Government Corporations
- Presidential Commissions
-
President's Cabinet
- appointed by president, confirmed by Senate
- State, Treasury, War/Defense, Justice, Interior
- Each dept serves a particular clientele
- Iron triangle between cabinet, congressional committees, and clientele
-
Independent Executive Agencies
- narrower scope of authority
- outside cabinet depts for political reasons
- NASA, CIA, FEMA, Peace Corps, Small Business Association
-
Regulatory Agencies
- independent from the executive branch
- much more answerable to Congress
- SEC, FDIC, Federal Reserve Board, EPA, EEOC, NTSB
-
Government Corporations
- run like private businesses, but funded by the government (at least partially)
- USPS, Amtrak, TVA
-
Presidential Commissions
- mostly temporary advisory things
- not much authority
- Presidential Commission on Civil Rights
-
Bureaucrats are usually
typical Americans, 30% minority, 45% women
-
Bureaucratic Culture
loyalty to the agency, reinforced by professionalism
-
Pros of Bureaucracy in Action
- professionalism
- efficiency
-
Cons of Bureaucracy in Action
infighting
-
Political Side of Bureaucracy
-
Congressional Oversight
- authorization
- funding
- hearings and investigations
- mandatory reports
- inspectors general
- legislative veto
- Government Accountability Office
- Congressional Budget Office
-
INS v. Chadha (1983)
SC ruled congressional vetos unconstitutional, but Congress continues to use them because there's nothing the SC can do about it
-
Government Accountability Office
keeps track of funds
-
Presidential Appointments
- need Senate approval
- recess appointments
- EOP
- OMB
-
What are recess appointments?
The President appoints someone while Congress is in recess. Congress often lets them keep the job.
-
The American legal system is a
common law tradition (as opposed to a civil law tradition).
-
Codified
stuff is put in a Codex, which judges are to consult before ruling
-
Stare decisis
- Latin for "precedent"
- body of law created by judges' decisions
- judges are not legally bound to follow precedents, but they are free to interpret them however they wish
-
Adversarial Tradition (as opposed to Inquisitorial)
- conflict resolved by conflicting parties presenting their arguments before a neutral judge
- procedural due process
-
Inquisitorial Tradtion
The judge takes a more active role in the precedings (questioning witnesses, doing research)
-
Litigious Americans
- comparitively easy access to courts
- strong sense of individual rights
- lack of other mechanisms to protect from risk
-
Types of Laws
- substantive
- procedural
- criminal
- civil
- constitutional
- statutory
-
Substantive Law
substance of law outlines legality of action
-
Procedural Law
- how law should be enforced (esp. court setting)
- procedural due process
-
Criminal Law
prohibits actions deemed detrimental to society (crimes)
-
Civil Law
regulates interactions between idividuals (tort)
-
Constitutional Law
outlining basic powers and limitations of government and rights of citizens
-
Statutory Law
any law passed by legislature
-
Constitutional Supreme Court Stuff
Article III
-
Judiciary Act of 1789
- established the rest of the federal judiciary
- Courts of Appeal, District Courts
-
Original Jurisdiction
- cases can go directly to the SC with no preliminary trials
- usually suits between state governments
-
Appellate Jurisdiction
- All other cases get to the SC by appeals
- Review matters at law
-
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- Established judicial review
- nothing in Constitution says judiciary can overturn acts of Congress
-
writ of mandamus
court order that compels someone to take a certain action, which he or she is legally required to complete
-
Supreme Court History
- Nation vs. State (1800-1860s)
- Regulating National Economy (1900-1940s)
- Civil Rights/Liberties (1940s-1970s)
-
SC Nation vs. State
- Early cases were all about states fighting for power against the national government
- McCollugh v. Maryland (1819)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
-
SC Regulating the National Economy
- National government's ability to interfere in private business (usually ruled in favor of business)
- Lochner v. New York (1925)
-
Lochner v. New York
New York tried to set a 12-hour work day, but the court struck it down, saying that it violated the rights of the businessmen (based on substantive due process)
-
SC Civil Liberties
Brown v. Board (1954)
-
Structure of the Federal Judiciary
- Supreme Court
- Courts of Appeal ("circuit courts")
- District Courts
- State Supreme Court
- State Courts of Appeal
- State District Courts
-
Dual Judicial System
States and Feds have their own court systems
-
writ of habeas corpus (def)
protects citizens from unlawful inprisonment
-
SC Structure
- 9 justices (subject to change)
- President appoints, Senate confirms
- lifetime tenure
- impeachment possible, but has never happened
-
Courts of Appeal Structure
- based on geographic areas
- 13 courts of appeal, federal and DC
-
District Court Structure
- 94 in all
- 1-4 in each state
- federal trial courts
- usually heard by single judge, but for more serious things, you can have jury
-
State SC Structure
- cases about the Constitution
- usually go on the SC
-
Writ of Habeas Corpus
- 5th and 14th Amendments
- You can file a writ of habeas corpus to move from state to federal courts.
- Particularly important to Civil Rights Era, now mostly when the case has some important relationship to constitutional issues
-
5th and 14th Amendments
- due process
- no witnessing against self
-
SC decision making
- court of last resort in all matters of US law
- rulings affect all lower courts
- their decisions/opinions make policy
- power of judicial review
-
Judicial Review
gives SC the power in rule on the Constitution and Presidential and Congressional acts
-
SC Development
- Become more powerful recently
- gave themselves JR
- took control of their docket in the 1920s
-
SC Decision Process
- 1. Writ of certiorari
- 2. Conference Vote
- 3. Oral Arguments
- 4. Vote on Merits
- 5. Opinion Writing
-
Writ of Certiorari/Set the Docket
- Petitioners ask the court to look over a badly ruled case
- Law clerks/cert pool- LC's decide what cases the court should/wants to look at. Sends the good ones to the cert pool, bad ones to the dead pool
-
Conference Vote
- Justices gather to discuss stuff (cases, memos, etc.)
- Rule of Four- if 4 Justices vote to hear a case, they take it
- Cases that make it are docketed, rejects move to the dead pool
- amicus curiae briefs-briefs filed with the court on behalf of the petitioners on one side of the argument
- Solicitor General- government's lawyer to the court, usually has a lot of sway
-
Oral Arguments
- Justices listen to arguments
- ask questions, generally to embarrass lawyers involved
-
Vote on Merits
- final vote for disposition
- winner decided by simple majority
-
Opinion Writing
- After the winner is decided, the Justices have to issue an opinion to help guide and set the law
- Majority opinion sets binding precedent
- Chief Justice decides who writes the opinion (usually CJ or next most senior justice)
- Concurring opinion issued by a Justice who voted with the majority, but still wants to issue his/her own opinion
- Dissenting opinion issued by a justice who thinks the case was decided wrongly
-
SC Making Doctrine/Policy
- Setting Precedent
- Setting Policy
-
Setting Precedent
- legal consideration
- overturning cases (Brown v. Board overturned Plessy v. Ferguson)
- building common law
-
Setting Policy
- Political considerations
- other branches
- public opinion
-
Judicial Philosophy
- strict constructionism
- judicial interpretivism
- judicial activism
- judicial restraint
- liberal ideology
- conservative ideology
-
Strict Constructionism
rule according to the original intent of the law
-
Judicial Interpretivism
change with the times
-
Judicial Activism
want an active role in setting laws and policies; proactive role
-
Judicial Restraint
reactive role
-
Justices pretend that
their own ideas do affect their decisions.
-
Selecting Federal Judges
- Appointed by President, confirmed by Senate
- Judging Credential
- Political ideology
- Senate Judiciary Committee
-
SFJ Judging Credentials
Most start from state courts, well-reputed lawyers
-
SFJ Political Ideology
- The president tries to choose people who similar PI to his own, who will rule in his favor
- Senate opposition
-
SFJ Senate Judiciary Committee
- Have hearing to talk to the judges and decide if they want to confirm or not
- One of the more prestigious committees
- Made mostly of former lawyers
- Full Senate confirmation vote
-
Bork Confirmation
- Good Credentials
- Got through the Committee hearing
- Spouted weirdness before the full Senate, was not confirmed
-
Thomas Confirmation
- A woman came forward accusing Thomas of sexual misconduct
- Threw a massive spotlight onto the precedings
- Thomas was still appointed
-
SC and Separation of Powers
- unelected ("non-political")
- judicial review
- Legitimacy balances Review
- Court lacks enforcement power
- If other branches disagree, they don't have to listen
- Congress can always amend the Constitution
-
Political Parties
Ongoinc coalition of interests with common goal of getting candidates elected to pursue policy interests
-
Parts of a Party
- 1. Organization (from chairperson to door knockers)
- 2. Party-in-Government (ones trying to accomplish the goals in government)
- 3. Party-in-the-Electorate (everyone who considers him/herslf affiliated with the party)
-
party affliation/partisanship
self-identification with the party
-
What do parties do?
- recruit and train leaders
- foster political participation among the masses
- connect citizens to leaders in electorate and policy coalitions
- allow citizens to hold leaders responsible for their actions
- channel and constrain political conflict
- organize the activities of government
-
Party labels make it easier for
people to identify with leaders.
-
Historical Development
- No one intended parties, but the way the political system is set up made them necessary
- Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats
- Jacksonian Era
- Progressive Movement
- Australian Ballot
-
Federalists vs. Jeffersonian Democrats
Major beef- state and national government power
-
Jacksonian Era
- Grassroots Movement-someone out of the political elite becoming involved in party issues
- National Conventions-then to choose candidates, now just a big party
- Party Machines-party organization controlled everything that went on in politics. Lead to corruption and the spoils system.
-
Progressive Movement
- Attempt to overturn some of the bad stuff from the Jacksonian Era
- Populist Party- attempt to get agrarian interests heard in government
- Progressive Party- encouraged civil and social reform
- Primary elections begin, so instead of the machine choosing all the candidates, the citizenry gets a say
-
initiatives and referenda
Instead of having politicians pass all laws, citizens can write laws and petition to get them put on the ballot. DIRECT DEMOCRACY
-
Australian (Secret) Ballot
- rise in party ideology- parties began using political ideology to influence constituents
- decline in political participation- no more jobs attached, voting became less important
-
Party Realignments
major disruption of the existing political order usually through a particularly divisive issue bringing about significant policy changes at the national level, reflected in enduring change in party colaitions and usually started during a "critical" election. Comes down to a change in party system.
-
Two-Party System
- Found in countries that took cues from GB
- tend to go with the SMD style
-
Multi-Party System
tend to go with proportional representation- all seats are up for grabs. Proportion of votes a party recieves is equated into the number of seats it gets
-
Duverger's Law
- Proportional representation = multi-party system
- Single member district = two-party system
- These two parties tend to converge at an ideological center while maintaining differences to get votes
-
Third Parties
- Usually not very successful
- They keep rising up only to be squashed by the US system.
-
Third Party Types
- 1. Reform parties- usually come from eras when one party system has been in place long enough to be corrupted
- 2. Single-Issue Parties-only concerned with one thing
- 3. Ideological Parties- usually on the fringe
-
Party Decline
- Rise in candidate-centered elections
- professional political consultants (campaign managers, media experts, etc.)
- Volunteers often rounded up by the national party
- campaign finance
- get out the vote (calling, visiting, mail)
- utilizing media better
-
Parties in Government
- The American government cannot exist without political parties.
- Structure political conflict
- Majority party decides who gets to speak in Congress etc.
- Party Responsibility
-
Party Responsibility
- idea of what the parties are supposed to do for the citzens and how the citizens should connect to the party
- 1. present clear ideological platform
- 2. candidates faithfully implement policies
- 3. voters hold elected officials responsible by voting them out
- 4. parties hold sway over elected officals, keeping them in line with party beliefs.
-
Platform
statement of the ideological stands of the party
-
Congress
- intended to be the branch with the most responsibility
- national lawmaking body
- policy making (large-scale impact)
- enumerated powers
- implied powers
- fiscla power
-
pork barrel spending
projects, grants, expenditures for someone's home state rather than the whole country
-
How many representatives are in the House?
435
-
What other requirements do reps have?
- 25 years old
- live in the US for 7 years or more
-
How long is a representative's term?
2 years
-
Representation in the House is
proportional by state populations
-
How many Senators are there?
100, 2 per state
-
What are the Constitutional requirements for Senators?
- 30 years old
- lived in US 9 years or more
-
How long is a Senator's term?
6 years
-
Special Responsibilites of the Senate
- impeachment
- confirmation
- approve treaties
- equal representation
-
Presidential System
- executive and legislative members elected seperately
- executive and legislature often at odds about who can do what--different agendas
-
Results of the Presidential System
- Potential for gridlock in policy creation
- more freedom to cater to constituents
-
Parliamentary System
- used in most older western democracies
- mostly in Europe
- Prime Minisiter is a member of the legislative body
- ensures that lead and body are the same party and agenda
-
Electoral System
- single member district
- simple majority
- run-off = must have 50% of the vote
-
Redistricting happens
every 10 years after the census to keep equal representation among districts
-
Redistricting is decided by
State legislatures
-
gerrymandering
redistricting to the advantage of a particular person or party
-
Wesberry v. Sanders (1964)
- all districts must have equal representation
- makes gerrymandering more difficult
-
Majority-Minority Districts
- District lines are drawn to equally represent races
- Good in theory, but not cool in practice.
- Often violated one person, one vote.
-
Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)
- Louisianna Zorro Districts ruled too ridiculous to be allowed.
- Districts cannot be drawn to dilute minority representation, but race can no longer be a primary concern in drawing district lines
-
Majoritarian Institution Benefits
- setting agenda
- setting rules and procedures to an extent
- chairin committees
|
|