-
group
two or more people with a common relationship
-
team
a smaller number of people who work closely together toward a common objective and are accountable to one another
-
groups become teams when:
- team members share leadership
- both individual and the team as a whole, share accountability for work of team
- team develops purpose or mission
- team works on problem-solving continuously
- team's measured effectiveness is the team's outcomes and goals
-
why use teams?
- more flexible and responsive to changing events
- ability to quickly assemble, deploy, refocus, and disband
- creates potential of greater outputs with no increased inputs
- can be motivational
-
types of teams
- problem-solving (process-improvement)
- self managed
- cross-functional (project)
- virtual
-
problem solving teams
a group of 5-12 employees from the same department who meet for a few hours each week to discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency and work environment
-
self-managed teams
group of 10-15 members who take on many of the responsibilities of their former managers
-
cross-functional teams
a group of employees at about the same hierarchical level, from different work areas, who come together to accomplish a task
-
task forces
temporary cross-functional team
-
committee
a group composed of members from different departments
-
skunkworks
cross-functional teams that develop spontaneously to create new products or work on complex problems
-
virtual teams
- uses computer technology to tie together physical dispersed members in order to achieve a common goal
- use vid conferences, email, online communication links
-
for virtual teams to be effective, there must be
- 1. trust established
- 2. team progress monitored closely
- 3. efforts/products of virtual team are publicized throughout organization
-
roles
set of expected behaviours of a person in a given position in a social unit
-
role expectations
how others believe a person should act in a given situation
-
role conflict
a situation in which an individual finds that complying with one role requirement may make it more difficult to comply with another
-
role ambiguity
a person is unclear about his/her role
-
role overload
too much is being expected of someone
-
role underload
too little is expected of someone, and that person feels that he/she is not contributing to the group
-
norms
acceptable standards of behaviour within a group that are shared by the group's members
-
most norms develop through
- explicit statements made by group members
- critical events in groups history
- primacy
- carry-over behaviours from past situations
-
what makes norms important?
- facilitates the group's survival
- increases predictability of behaviours
- reduces embarrassing interpersonal problems for group members
- allows members to express central values of the group and clarify distinctive group identity
-
The five-stage model of group development
- 1. forming - uncertainty about team structure, purpose, and leadership
- 2. storming - intragroup conflict, develop hierarchy, individualistic tendencies
- 3. norming - close relationships, cohesiveness, team identity, common set of expectations emerges
- 4. adjourning - for temporary groups, attention directed at wrapping up activities
-
Punctuated-Equilibrium Model is
for groups that are temporary and have deadlines. They act their own way.
-
common norms:
- performance
- appearance
- social arrangements
- allocation of resources
-
punctuated-equilibrium model, how temporary groups act are:
- 1st meeting stets group's direction
- 1st phase of groups activity is one of inertia
- transition then takes place,at exactly half of allotted time
- transition = major changes occur
- 2nd phase of inertia
- last meeting = accelerated activity
-
Temporary groups:
combines forming/norming, period of low performing, then storming, then high performing, then finally adjourning
-
The two group theories
- 5-stage theory considers interpersonal process of group.
- Punctuated-Equilibrium model considers time challenges
-
team effectiveness
objective measures of productivity, manager's ratings of performance, measures of member satisfaction
-
team effectiveness four general categories
- 1. resources/other contextual influences that make teams effective
- 2. team composition
- 3. work design
- 4. team process (things that occur in team that influence effectiveness)
-
team effectiveness - Context
- adequate resources
- leadership/structure
- climate of trust
- performance evaluation and rewards
-
Team effectiveness - composition
- skills
- personality
- roles
- diversity
- size
- members flexibility
- preference teamwork
-
Team effectiveness - work design
- autonomy
- skill variety
- task identity
- task significance
-
team effectiveness - process
- common purpose
- specific goals
- mental models
- managed conflict level
- accountability
-
Adequate Resources (context of team effectiveness)
- teams need support from management and the larger organization to succeed
- support such as technology, staffing, admin assistance, encouragement and timely info
-
Leadership and Structure (context of team effectiveness)
leader's role is creating a team atmosphere, setting clear and meaningful direction for the team, making sure that the team structure will support working effectively, ensuring that the team operates within a supportive organizational context, and provides expert coaching
-
multi-team systems
different teams need to coordinate their efforts to produce a desired outcome
-
climate of trust (context of effective teams)
- integrity
- competence
- consistency
- loyalty
- openness
- all help build trust, important to be effective
-
Performance evaluation and rewards
managers should consider group based appraisals, profit sharing, gainsharing, small-group incentives, and other system modifications that reinforce team effort/commitment
-
Composition
- how teams should be staffed
- skills, personality, roles of members
- diversity
- size of team
-
Skills necessary to performa effectively in teams
- 1. needs people with technical expertise
- 2. needs people with problem-solving and decision-making skills
- 3. needs people with good listening, feedback, resolution and other interpersonal skills
-
teamwork skills
- orients team to problem solving situation
- organizes and manages team performance
- promotes a positive team environment
- facilitates/manages task conflict
- appropriately promotes perspective
-
personality
people should be selected based on personalities and preferences,a nd team's need for diversity and roles
-
roles
- task oriented roles - performed by group members to ensure that the tasks of the group are accomplished. (initiators, info seekers, info providers, elaborators, summarizers, consensus makers)
- maintenance roles - performed to maintain good relations within group (harmonizers, compromisers, encouragers)
- individual roles - performed, but are not productive for keeping team on task
-
task-oriented roles of effective team functioning
- initiating
- seeking information and opinions
- providing information and opinions
- clarifying
- elaborating
- summarizing
- consensus testing
-
maintenance oriented roles of effective team functioning
- harmonizing
- compromising
- gatekeeping
- encouraging
-
group diversity
- refers to the presence of a heterogeneous mix of individuals within a group
- differ in functional and demographic characteristics
-
advantages of group diversity
- multiple perspectives
- greater openness to new ideas
- multiple interpretations
- increased creativity
- increased flexibility
- increased problem-solving skills
-
disadvantages of group diversity
- ambiguity
- complexity
- confusion
- miscommunication
- difficulty reaching a single agreement
- difficulty in agreeing on specific actions
-
size factors of team effectiveness
- less than ten is the most effective team size
- too many members = coordination problems, cohesiveness and mutual accountability decline, social loafing increases, more people do less talking in comparison to others
-
social loafing
the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively vs. individually
-
member's flexibility
- improves adaptability, makes team less reliant on any singly member
- flexible members are capable of completing each others tasks, lead to higher performing groups
-
members' preference of teamwork
- individual preferences should be considered as to not damage teams morale
- one should prefer teamwork
-
work design
- includes variables such as freedom and autonomy, opportunity to utilize different skills and talents, ability to complete a whole/identifiable task or product, and participation that has impact on others
- these characteristics motivate teams
-
Process variables that contribute to team effectiveness
- common purpose
- establish goals
- team efficacy
- mental models
- managed conflict levels
- system of accountability
-
common purpose
- provides direction, momentum and commitment
- reflexivity - a team characteristic of reflecting on and adjusting the master plan when necessary
-
specific goals
- energizes team
- clear communication
- turns team purpose into specific, measurable, realistic goals
- milestones allow focus
-
team efficacy
- confidence/belief = effective
- cohesiveness -> degree to which team members are attracted to each other and are motivated to stay on the team
-
cohesiveness and performance norms = productivity levels
- high cohesiveness + high performance norms = high productivity
- high cohesiveness + low perf norms = low productivity
- low cohesiveness + high perf norms = moderate productivity
- low cohesiveness + low perf norms = moderate to low productivity
-
Mental models
- knowledge/beliefs about how the work gets done
- must have common/accurate models
-
managed level of conflict
- conflict can be good
- usually bad = interpersonal incompatibilities, tensions and animosity
- no conflict = less effective team
- appropriate level of conflict is optimum
- avoiding conflict = lower performance, forgetting key issues, and unaware of important situation aspects
-
reducing team conflict
- more info, not less, for debate on basis of acts
- have multiple alternatives to enrich debate
- develop agreed upon goals
- use humour
- maintain balanced power structure
- resolve issues without forcing consensus
-
accountability
- making members individually and jointly accountable for the team's success
- (purpose, goals and approach)
- clearly defined responsibilities = important
-
3 ways to test if teams are necessary
- 1. can the work be done by more than one person?
- 2. does the work create a common purpose of set of goals fo rthe people in the group that is more than the sum of individual goals
- 3. are the members of the group interdependent?
|
|