Writing the Literature Review

  1. are usually driven by the context of previous knowledge, with specific research questions in mind.
    Quantitative research studies
  2. The (1)_______ indicates the variables or constructs under consideration while the (2)_______surfaces the arguments of the study
    • 1. central question of the study
    • 2. literature review
  3. This begins the (1)______ of the research process wherein the literature review leads to the identification of the research approach and design.
    logical progression
  4. The role of a ______ is to provide a tentative explanation to these questions which serves as a basis of the solutions to the identified problems in the investigation.
    hypothesis
  5. is a “logical supposition , a reasonable guess, an educated conjecture that is based on an extensive review of literature.
    hypothesis
  6. It is usually triggered by constant recurring situations in our daily life that prompts the normal reaction of the brain. Whenever something happens, the natural tendency is to give possible reasons for its occurrence. We then try to gather data so as to prove which of these reasons are correct.
    Hypothesizing
  7. can be the claim of the researcher/s, or assumptions, or what the researcher/s wanted to determine.
    Hypothesis
  8. (2) includes in the formulating the hypothesis
    1. the null and alternative hypotheses
  9. which is denoted by Ho is the assumption about the behavior of the population or sample observation
    null hypothesis
  10. which is denoted by Ha is the opposite statement of the other hypothesis. It is the claim or assumption that we are attempting to establish
    alternative hypothesis
  11. are intelligent, tentative guesses that tell us about how a research problem may be resolved
    Hypotheses

    (Leedy and Omrod, 2013).
  12. is of prime importance in an investigation. The entire study rests upon the potential significance of the hypotheses.
    formulation of usable hypotheses
  13. indicators of usable hypotheses:
    It should be conceptually clear

    It should be capable of being tested

    It should have empirical basis.

    It must be specific.
  14. The hypothesis must be easily understood by the readers. Readers may not always come from the same field of endeavor as yours, so it is necessary that you use plain and simple words which have a universal meaning.
    It should be conceptually clear.
  15. used in the formulation of the hypothesis should be operationally defined which means that it’s meaning should be in accordance to how it is used in the study.
    Variables/constructs/concepts
  16. A list of the definition of important terms will come in handy when the _______ will be written. These definitions should be cross referenced in order to establish the acceptability of its meaning in the field.
    review of related literature
  17. By a testable hypothesis, it means that deductions can be made which can be established or refuted by a survey, an experiment or an observation. Testing of the hypothesis must be done within a reasonable period of time so that its results will be timely to serve its purpose. Therefore, even a well-written hypothesis is nothing if it cannot be tested or if it will require a long period of time to prove.
    It should be capable of being tested.
  18. __________ may either support or not support the hypothesis. So there is no need to intentionally prove that the hypothesis is correct even if it is not. We have to bear in mind that a hypothesis is just a possible explanation of the research question or subproblems which may or may not be true. This is the reason why a hypothesis still needs to be tested. Therefore, whatever result the investigation may have, as long as the research was done with rigor and sophistication then the results will still prove to be acceptable.
    resulting data
  19. It should not be formulated out of gut feel or moral judgments. The need to hypothesize it may come from contradictory results of previous researchers or it may not have been done yet. It is for this reason that prior to hypothesis formulation, an extensive review of related literature should have been undertaken first. Additionally, a good hypothesis should be able to refute, qualify, or support an existing theory or concept in the field.
    It should have a basis or empirical evidence
  20. All the operations and predictions indicated in the hypothesis must be clearly stated if it deals with differences, relationships, or effects. It is tempting to hypothesize using grand ideas because it seems to be impressive and important. But if it is not feasible it is better for the students, who are neophyte researchers, to avoid such problems and instead develop their research skills upon more doable things.
    It must be specific.
  21. Types of Hypotheses According to Relationships among the Variables
    (Correlations, Effect, Differences)
  22. is a tentative explanation of expected relationships between two or more variables as derived from an extensive review of literature and the researcher’s experience
    hypothesis
  23. are more specific, testable, and indicative of expected results
    research hypotheses
  24. indicates the researcher’s expectations of what the results will be prior to data collection.
    hypothesis
  25. deals with the relationships in the behavioral patterns between two variables without any implied causality
    correlations
  26. deals also with behavioral patterns as well but causality is implied.
    effects
  27. It should explicitly state the test variable and the grouping variable.
    differences
  28. indicates the variable to which differences are taken.
    test variable
  29. Test variable may be measured using any of the four scales:
    nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio
  30. The _______ indicates the number of groupings or samples that are being compared. This is only measured in the nominal scale.
    grouping variable
  31. Types of Hypotheses According to Form
    (Null and Alternative Hypotheses)
  32. indicates no relationship between and among the variables under investigation (no correlation, no difference, no effect)
    null hypothesis
  33. indicates a significant relationship
    alternative hypothesis
  34. There should only be one claim per hypothesis, either there is a relationship or no relationship
    True

    These two situations are mutually exclusive, which means that only one is probably true. The researcher cannot claim both at the same time.
  35. is a tentative theory regarding the topic under investigation usually shown in a diagram
    The conceptual framework

    (Punch, 2009). It explains the hypothesized relationships among the variables thus making it easy to understand the arguments advanced in the study.
  36. (2) elements of the conceptual framework, namely:

    A. the type of (1)_______ under investigation grouped according to how readily it can be (2)_____ and
    B. the (3)______ relationship between any two variables.
    • 1. variable
    • 2. measured
    • 3. hypothesized
  37. These are variables which can be readily measured. They are observable variables like the demographic profile of the respondents and thus well need only one question to measure the said variables.
    Manifest variables.
  38. Age, occupation, ⁠temperature, and amount of fertilizer are some examples of _______. A rectangular shape is used to illustrate these variables.
    manifest variables
  39. These variables cannot be readily measured by a single question. These are several indicators of a _________ and there is a need to ask several questions before one can measure it.
    Latent variables.
  40. Happiness, job satisfaction, attitude, and perception are some examples of ______. It is represented by an oval in the conceptual framework.
    latent variables
  41. Three possible relationships exist between any two variables, namely:
    correlations, differences, and effects.
  42. are expressed using the double-bladed arrow
    Correlations
  43. make use of a straight line
    differences
  44. is shown using the single-bladed arrow from independent to dependent variables
    effects
  45. is of the related reference materials read for the study a written synthesis such as journal articles, books, and other documents that describe the past and current state of information about the focus of the study. It lays down the organization of the literature into subtopics so as to surface the need for the study and the arguments of the study
    literature review
  46. Information included in the review may also come from newspaper or magazine articles, conference papers, and government documents relevant to the study
    True

    but are not from any grey literature and online predatory journals that are easily downloadable from the Internet.
  47. refers to concept papers, theses and dissertations uploaded in the Internet by an individual or an illegitimate group, which were not peer-reviewed by experts in the field.
    grey literature
  48. “ ______ when they present a seemingly legitimate face for an illegitimate publication process that lacks basic industry standards, sound peer-review practices, or a solid basis in publication ethics. Such journals exploit the pressure to publish and the desire for access, and create confusion on the part of prospective authors and readers”
    journals are tagged predatory

    (Christopher and Young, 2015).
  49. The literature review section of the research paper contains the (1)_____ and (2)______ of the arguments of the study.
    • 1. theoretical
    • 2. conceptual bases
  50. It should be able to provide the readers with: concise, objective, and logical summary of the current information about the topic of interest. Structuring the review so that it is presented in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner is vital. It is necessary to develop the proper outline first before starting to write.
    Literature Review
  51. A well-organized literature review will consist of
    • (1) the bases of the arguments of the study,
    • (2) the conceptual framework, and
    • (3) the research hypotheses.
  52. is a vital component in any research undertaking. No research can proceed without writing down what one has read about the research topic, putting things in the proper perspective, documenting what has already been done, with the goal of surfacing what else needs to be done.
    review of related literature
  53. T or F. Writing the literature review does not entail only summarizing what authors of previous researches done.
    True

    (It requires synthesizing the findings of previous researches done on the chosen topic to show conflicting results where the current research can verify the real scenario in this conflict or come up with something which has not been done yet in the previous researches.)
  54. When constructing the review of related literature, the researcher must be able to ensure the following:

    Provide (1)_______ of the study and (2)______ the relationship between the proposed research and previous research, both empirical and theoretical.
    Show how the proposed study is (3)_____ from previous research.
    Convince the reader that the study is (4)_____ and worthwhile.
    Demonstrate a (5)______ as a scholar, not simply a knowledge of others’ works (e.g., “Jones says…” “Anderson states…”). Formulate an (6)_______ from your perspective.
    Make (7)________ and convince the reader of their legitimacy by providing logical and (8)__________. All assertions must be accompanied by empirical support.
    • 1. context
    • 2. clarify
    • 3. unique
    • 4. timely
    • 5. critical ability
    • 6. argument
    • 7. assertions
    • 8. empirical support
  55. All the variables in the conceptual framework should be discussed in a separate section in the literature review, with the goal of surfacing the argument stated in the hypothesis.

    Taking into account the research articles reviewed when the conceptual framework was developed, each section should contain two essential elements: the (1)_______ and the (2)_______
    True

    • 1. synthesis part
    • 2. argument part.
  56. should contain the definition of the variable and its historical development. It should likewise contain a synthesis of the findings from previous researches that will either support or contradict the hypothesis relative to the variable being discussed.
    synthesis part of the literature review

    This will revolve around relationships and effects with another variable or its difference when grouped according to a certain profile. In order to have a more concise and logical write-up, the researcher should consider the assertion-proofs formula (De Guzman, 2015).
  57. will contain a summary or the researcher’s perceived manifestation of the findings from previous researches and then provide the proofs of such assertion as stated by the authors of the said researches.
    assertion portion
  58. After the synthesis of all the reviewed related literature has been written down, transition statements vis-à-vis the analysis of such synthesis should be indicated. This will surface the rationale for the hypothesis concerning the variables or a statement leading to the argument of the study should be explicitly written. This will allow the researcher to indicate whether the said hypothesis has not been investigated yet or had produced conflicting results as indicated in the synthesis.
    Argument Part of the Literature Review
  59. The adequacy of the review of related literature is judged using three criteria:
    the selection of the (1)_____,
    the synthesis and analysis of the (2)______, and the
    (3)_______ of the literature to the current study.
    • 1. sources
    • 2. literature
    • 3. relevance
Author
Mayie
ID
356845
Card Set
Writing the Literature Review
Description
PracticalResearch2
Updated