Week 2 continued

  1. An open field is unoccupied or undeveloped land outside the curtilage of the home and is NOT an "effect" within the meaning of the 4th
    open field doctrine
  2. police entry into open fields does not implicate 4th amendment
    true
  3. law enforcement trespassed on D’s rural property, ignoring "no trespass" signs and discovered marijuana fields. Is there a search?
    Oliver
  4. 4 factor test for determining if area=curtilage (extension of the home)
    • 1. Proximity of the area to the home
    • 2. Whether the area is in an enclosure near the home (shed)
    • 3. Nature of the uses of the area
    • 4. Steps taken to protect the area from outside observation
    • What's protected in terms of if search occurred:
    • The house itself
    • Structures within the curtilage
    • The curtilage itself
    • Sidewalks and driveways
  5. The gov received a warrant to install a GPS on D's car in DC within 10 days, on the 11th day the warrant no longer applied b/c the police acted outside the location and time frame
    • U.S. v. Jones
    • #AppleAirTags
  6. Does Attaching a GPS to an individual’s car, and using that GPS to monitors that individuals movements on public streets constitutes a search ?
    yes
  7. does Attaching a GPS to an individual’s car, and using that GPS to monitors that individuals movements on public streets violate the 4th amendment ?
    yes
  8. reasonable expectation to privacy
    Katz
  9. is Using a drug sniffing dog on a homeowners porch to interstate what’s inside the home is a search ?
    • yes
    • - Florida v. Jardines
  10. - Case where police got unverified tip that D was growing marijuana in home.
    - Month later officer went to D's home with a drug-sniffing dog that  picked up on the scent of narcotics before leaving.
    - officer used this information to apply for a warrant to search D's house: marijuana plants were found in the house and D was charged w/trafficking in cannabis
    • Flordia v. Jardines
    • #K9OnThePorch
  11. Did the police trespass onto Jardines property when they brought K9 on his porch ?
    yes
  12. Does the reasonable expectation to privacy test apply to Jardine
    yes, his porch is apart of his home
  13. Area surrounding/ associated with the home receives protection b/c it is a part of the home
    Curtilage Rule:
  14. Open fields (even if privately owned) are a free-for all if police are gathering information
    Open Field Doctrine
  15. T/F: The home and curtilage of the home are protected by the 4th Open fields are not
    true
  16. - Case where D and others ordered 50 gallon of ether from an gov't informant
    - informant consented to the agents
    substituting the container with their own that contained a beeper
    • U.S. v. Karo
    • - BepperContainer
  17. Does the installation of a beeper in a container of chemicals w/consent of original owner constitutes seizure under as understood in 4th amendment when the buyer of the container does not know of the beeper?
    • NO
    • - karo
  18. the transfer of the container in Karo did not constitute a seizure b/c?
    The container that had the beeper in it belonged to the DEA, so no 4th amendment rights were violated
  19. There is a ___ where there is a meaningful interference with one’s ____
    seizure, property interest
Author
dwrght16
ID
356312
Card Set
Week 2 continued
Description
open field doctrine is there a search continued
Updated