-
Hearsay Generally
Inadmissible: statement to prove the truth about the matter asserted
Exception: federal statute, FRE, Supreme Court
-
Non Hearsay Examples (6)
Data from machines
Reaction from animals
Explain conduct of police investigation
Identifying characteristics
Effect on listener
Statements of contract
-
Non Hearsay Declaration W prior statement
Declarant W prior statement: testifies & subject to cross about statement
Inconsistent: given under penalty of perjury (trial, hearing, other proceeding, deposition)
Consistent: to rebut fabrication (statement occurred before motive to fabricate) or restore credibility from other attack
Identification: person declarant perceived earlier
-
Non Hearsay Opposing Party Statement
Opposing party statement: must be offered against opposing party and (statement alone does not establish 3,4, and 5)
- (1) Made statement
- (2) Adopted or believed to be true
- (3) Made by authorized person
- (4) Made by agent or employee within scope of relationship while it existed
- (5) Made by coconspirator during & in furtherance of conspiracy
-
Hearsay Exceptions Generally (8)
Present sense impression: event or condition description during or immediately after perceiving
Excited utterance: startling event caused statement
Then-existing condition: statement of state of mind, emotional, sensory, or physical condition
Medical treatment: medical history, symptoms, inception, or general cause
Recorded recollection: cannot recall, made/adopted by W, and reflects W knowledge
Recorded statement: author doesn’t have to be W
Record routine practice: act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis
Conditions: info from person with knowledge (doesn’t have to be recorder), near time of occurrence, routine, trustworthy
Procedure: W testify conditions met
Absence of record: prove matter did not occur or exist
Public records: public office activities and matter legal duty to report
Exceptions:
Criminal case: matter observed by law enforcement (police reports)
Civil case: factual findings from legally authorized investigation
Absence of public record: prove record did not exist or matter did not occur
- Judgement conviction: judgement after trial or guilty plea (not nolo), prove material fact & 1+ yr. crime (if non-impeachment use it’s against D)
-
-
Hearsay Exceptions Declarant Unavailable
Criteria for unavailable (5)
Exceptions (4)
- Declarant Unavailable:
- (1) Privilege
- (2) Refusing to testify
- (3) No recall
- (4) Death, then-existing infirmity, physical/mental illness
- (5) Can’t produce by process
- Exceptions:
- (1)Former testimony: given as W in any trial, hearing, or deposition and offered against party that had opportunity to direct, cross, or redirect
- (2)Wrongful unavailability: Statement against party that caused declarant unavailability as W intentionally
- (3)Imminent death: Declarant believed imminent death and made statement about its cause (civil cases or homicide criminal cases)
- (4)Statement against interest: reasonable person in declarant position would only make statement if believed it to be true (economic interest, invalidate claim, exposure to civil or criminal liability) Criminal cases: corroborating evidence needed (timing when statement was made, motive to fabricate, repeated, people told, relationship declarant & party)
-
Hearsay Residual Exception
Residual exception: catch all interest of justice
Requirement: notice before trial/hearing including declarant name and address
-
6th Confrontation Clause
Inadmissible: hearsay is testimonial (must confront & cross)
Test: reasonable W believe statements used in trial
Testimonial: grand jury, formal interview with police, forensic reports,
Non-testimonial: coconspirator statements, business records not created for prosecution, emergency interrogation with police
-
Declarant Credibility Evidence
Credibility: can be attacked when hearsay statement admitted, and supported by character, convictions, credibility impeachment
Inconsistent statement: admitted regardless of its time of occurrence and declarant opportunity to explain or deny it
Party: calls adverse declarant as W then can cross examine
|
|