-
What is a theory?
- accumulated knowledge
- based on evidence
- organized set of concepts and explanations about a phenomenon
-
What are the functions of a theory?
- Explanation (scope, validity, parsimony)
- prediction
- control
- heuristic
- communicative
- inspiration
-
What are the elements of a theory?
- scope
- concepts (elements)
- connections (explanations)
- assumptions (accept as true)
- generalizations (conclusions based on theory)
-
Empiricism vs. Interpretivism
- Empiricism (positivism): absolute truths (post-positivist allows for a bit of interpretivism). Rationalism. Traditional social science. Hypothetico-deductive approach. Variable-analytic tradition
- Interpretivism (naturalism): subjectivism, humanism, constructivism. Assumes action is voluntary, knowledge is created socially, theories are contextually bound/value laden/based on engaging with the world, theories affect reality.
-
What makes a good theory? (necessary components)
- explanatory power
- formalization/coherence
- integration/comprehensiveness (no contradictions)
- parsimony (simple)
- falsifiability (ability to be proven wrong)
- accuracy (reflect reality)
- fruitfulness (generates new knowledge)
-
What makes an even better theory?
- predictive power
- specificity
- breadth
- novelty
- control
- aesthetics
-
operationalization
take something abstract and make it measurable
-
Purpose (Affection Exchange Theory)
- explain why humans communicate affection
- benefits of affection
- benefits of providing affection
- consequences of lack of affection
-
Assumptions (Affection Exchange Theory)
- post-positivist
- main human goals are procreation and survival
- we are not always aware of how comm serves these goals
- we don't need to be aware for these to affect our behavior
-
Features (Affection Exchange Theory)
- Need and capacity for affection are inborn
- expressions are usually consistent with actually feelings (covary)
- Affection comm is adaptive
- We vary in optimal tolerances for affection and affectionate behaviors
- Affectionate behaviors that violate the range of optimal tolerance are physiologically aversive
-
Role of Communication (Affection Exchange Theory)
- Affection is displayed through comm (verbal, direct nonverbal, indirect nonverbal)
- These are usually interpreted accurately
-
Uses (Affection Exchange Theory)
- Explains why some relationships are more affectionate
- Explains how affection affects health
- Explains why humans are affectionate
- Provides means for non-pharmacological health interventions
-
Discussion points (Affection Exchange Theory)
- Problematic "no touch" children policies
- Does it matter who is touching you to heal you?
- Stress moderating properties
- Skin to skin contact at birth is important
- haptic=touch
-
Purpose (Attachment Theory)
- Understand how parent-child interaction affects personality development
- How relational experiences affect communication within relationships/relational quality
-
Assumptions (Attachment Theory)
- Innate need to form attachments (product of biological forces and social interaction)
- Attachment system is activated when humans need protection from experience/stress
-
Features (Attachment Theory)
- Attachment security spectrum from secure to insecure
- Need secure base (protect us from harm, provide us with protection/intimacy)
- IWMS/IWMO cross to get 4 types (preoccupied, secure, fearful, dismissive)
- Attachment is relatively stable (can change with time/relationship)
- Goodness of fit (secure, dismissive, anxious ambivalent)
-
Role of Communication (Attachment Theory)
- Comm leads to attachment
- Attachment influences comm creating relationship quality
- attachment influences comm influences partner response reinforces/alters attachment
-
Uses (Attachment Theory)
- Parenting
- Relational maintenance
- Conflict
- Intimacy
- Pain tolerance
- Social Skills
-
Strengths (Attachment Theory)
- balances models of self and others
- relatable to everyone
- considers thought processes of others
- huge population for study
-
Limitations (Attachment Theory)
- 4 sections? Or on a spectrum?
- Scope can be too big
-
Discussion (Attachment Theory)
- Family of Origin vs. Family of Procreation
- Intergenerational transmission of conflict
- Juxtaposition of continuum of attachments vs. discrete attachment types
- We may love differently than our partner, not more or less
-
Purpose (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Explain how/why strangers communicate
- Expanded to cover other relationships
- First 15 minutes of interaction with a stranger
-
Assumptions (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Uncertainty ALWAYS leads to anxiety
- post-positivist
- uncertainty is uncomfortable BECAUSE it produces anxiety
- comm can be both a cause and an effect of uncertainty
- we seek to reduce uncertainty if expectations are violated/we anticipate future interactions/the individual is associated with costs and rewards
-
Features (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Defining uncertainty (levels: high/low, types: cognitive/behavioral, interpersonal relationships: self/partner/relationship)
- Axioms: + information seeking behaviors/reciprocity rate, all else is -
- Predictions: 3 strategies to reduce uncertainty- Seeking info (active, passive, interactive), planning, hedging
-
Role of Communication (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
Comm can be both a cause and an effect of uncertainty
-
Uses (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
Romantic relationships (competing relationship, unexplained behavior, sudden change in contact/closeness, massive change in personality or values, deception, reactions)
-
Strengths (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Been around for a long time
- predictive power
- lots of research
- comm is central to the theory
- fruitful
- parsimonious
- scope
- breadth
-
Limitations (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Assumes uncertainty is always unwanted/leads to anxiety
- has been applied to so many different scenarios so that it doesn't always apply
-
Discussion (Uncertainty Reduction Theory)
- Predictability/novelty
- control?
- ecological validity
- health and family comm
- topic avoidance
- advanced care directives
- role of relationships
-
Purpose (Uncertainty Management Theory)
Predict people's comm decisions (health comm)
-
Assumptions (Uncertainty Management Theory)
- Uncertainty leads to a VARIETY of emotions
- People will ALWAYS manage uncertainty, not necessarily reduce it
- Post-positivist
- Sometimes people desire uncertainty
- Difference between information and uncertainty
-
Features (Uncertainty Management Theory)
- Management
- 1. seek information
- 2. avoid information
- 3. adapt to uncertainty
-
Uses (Uncertainty Management Theory)
health field
-
Strengths (Uncertainty Management Theory)
- Gives us better understanding in making predictions
- explanatory power
-
Limitations (Uncertainty Management Theory)
- Less precise because more latitude in making decisions
- lack of predictive power
-
Discussion (Uncertainty Management Theory)
- Predictability/novelty
- Control?
- Ecological Validity
- Topic avoidance
- family and health comm
-
Assumptions (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Uncertainty MAY cause anxiety
- post-positivist
- interpersonal relationships (doctor/patient)
- only applies when people are motivated to reduce uncertainty
- blend of the last two theories
-
Features (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Phases
- 1. Interpretation (is there a discrepancy?)
- 2. Evaluation (outcome and efficacy [comm/target/coping])
- 3. Decision (how to manage)
-
Uses (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Doctor-patient interaction
- sexual health seeking behaviors
- organ donation (article)
-
Strengths (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Predictive power
- focuses on the other person
-
Limitations (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Assumes rational thought
- emits role of other emotions
-
Discussion points (Theory of Motivated Information Management)
- Predictability/novelty
- control
- ecological validity
- health and family comm
- topic avoidance
-
Purpose (Attribution Theory)
- Answers "why" to bad situations/unexpected behaviors
- internal and external process of interpreting and understanding what is behind our own and other's behaviors
-
Assumptions (Attribution Theory)
If we don't have all the information, we will draw our own conclusions
-
Features (Attribution Theory)
- Dimensions (globality, stability, locus, intent, selfishness, blameworthiness)
- correspondence vs. covariation
- responsibility
- bias (actor-observer, self-serving, negativity, relationship enhancing, activity)
-
Role of Communication (Attribution Theory)
- attributions are explanations for comm acts
- ...are meanings
- ...are what we communicate about
- ...determine comm acts
-
Uses (Attribution Theory)
- relational satisfaction
- conflict
- nonverbal comm
- aggression/violence
-
Strengths (Attribution Theory)
- explanatory/predictive power
- evidence
- reasonable scope
- aesthetically pleasing
- makes sense
-
Limitations (Attribution Theory)
- Not consistently explained variables
- contextually/culturally bound
- not applied same way across cultures (limits usefulness)
-
Discussion (Attribution Theory)
- activity bias
- fatalism vs. agency
-
Purpose (Face Theory)
- Understand why and how people construct public images
- strategies to maintain/restore own or others' images
- competence: appropriateness and effectiveness
-
Assumptions (Face Theory)
- Interpretivist
- self is symbolic construction
- all people have face (public image)
- motivated to preserve face
- interactions are symbolic enactments of cultural rituals
- all meaning everywhere is socially constructed
-
Features (Face Theory)
- All the world is a stage (dramaturgy)
- life is a performance (actor/part)
- other people must play with us
- front/back stage
- face can be lost (in wrong face, out of face, shamefaced) and restored through facework
-
Role of Communication (Face Theory)
when rules are broken, we use comm to restore order
-
Uses (Face Theory)
- why people get embarrassed
- intimate partner violence
- social predicaments
- teasing at wedding/baby shower
- intercultural comm
-
Strengths (Face Theory)
- broad scope
- explanatory/predictive/heuristic power
- aesthetics
- coherences
-
Limitations (Face Theory)
non-parsimonious (simple)
-
Purpose (Politeness Theory)
Why people don't always directly say what they mean
-
Assumptions (Politeness Theory)
- post-positivist
- interpretivist
- we are all motivated to maintain face and cooperate in interactions
-
Features (Politeness Theory)
- Face is public/social/claimed/something we want/on the line in every interaction
- Negative vs positive face
- impolite = doesn't consider negative face
- strategies (bald on record, positive face redress, negative face redress, off record, ignore/do nothing)
-
Role of Communication (Politeness Theory)
Face-threatening acts are negotiated through comm
-
Uses (Politeness Theory)
- Predict how polite someone will be
- how behavior will be evaluated
- understand social processes
-
Strengths (Politeness Theory)
- Multi-disciplinary
- predictive/explanatory/heuristic power
- broad scope
- parsimonious
- conceptual interrelatedness
-
Limitations (Politeness Theory)
- Does not always apply in other cultures
- conceptualization of politeness
-
Discussion (Politeness Theory)
- Imaginative interactions (URT)
- need to belong theory
- organizational culture
- social proof
- looking-glass self (6 people) can lead to cognitive dissonance
-
Purpose (Theories of Social Exchange)
- predict and explain behavior
- relational satisfaction/commitment
-
Assumptions (Theories of Social Exchange)
- post-positivist
- rational thought
- self-interest
- interpersonal relationships involve interdependence
- social behavior is a series of exchanges
- decisions based on evaluations of costs/rewards
- want to maximize rewards/minimize costs
- receiving rewards = obligation
-
Features (Theories of Social Exchange)
- Costs and rewards (social, emotional, instrumental, opportunity)
- outcomes = overall level of profit/deficit (rewards minus costs)
- all about perception
-
Role of Communication (Theories of Social Exchange)
- means through which exchanges take place
- actual resource being exchanged
-
Interdependence Theory (Theories of Social Exchange)
- accounts for expectations
- CL to evaluate
- based on other, what we experience, and media
- satisfaction = (rewards - costs) - CL
- satisfied when outcome meets/exceeds CL
- CLalt = perceive other options, high/low
- See chart about satisfied/committed
-
Equity Theory (Theories of Social Exchange)
- perceived fairness
- underbenefitted/overbenefitted
- equity leads to maintenance behaviors
- relieve stress by 1. restoring actual equity 2. restoring psychological equity 3. leaving relationship
-
Strengths (Theories of Social Exchange)
- parsimony
- heuristic/predictive/explanatory power
- validity
-
Limitations (Theories of Social Exchange)
- does not apply to all relationships
- people are not always rational or self-serving
-
Discussion (Theories of Social Exchange)
- control mutuality
- fitzpatrick couple types (traditional, independents, separates)
- does everyone want equity?
- denigration of alternatives
-
Purpose (Narratives Theories)
- understand ways humans make sense of their identities/relationships/lives
- interrogate the ways in which stories construct/confirm/reject/negotiate our identities
-
Assumptions (Narratives Theories)
- interpretive and critical
- cortical congruence
-
Features (Narratives Theories)
- Master narrative -> narrative as concept -> stories
- importance of temporality
- narrative as ontology/epistemology/individual construction/relationship process
-
Uses (Narratives Theories)
- restoring identity and lives
- cope with loss/trauma
- predict relational outcomes
- predict psychological health
- narrative therapy
- expressive writing
-
Strengths (Narratives Theories)
- useful
- fruitful
- breadth (both, theory of everything)
-
Limitations (Narratives Theories)
- no single theory
- breadth (theory of everything)
-
Discussion (Narratives Theories)
- drinking behaviors
- theory of normative social behavior (descriptive vs. Social norms)
- selective exposure
- shared identity
- affectives and impactiveness
- counter-narratives
-
Why do people stay in bad relationships?
- social exchange
- interdependence
- learned helplessness
- investment theory
- intergenerational transmission
- traumatic bonding theory
- paradoxical punishment
- attribution theory
- impression management
- co-dependence (afflicted/functional)
- religiosity/tradition/culture
- individual characteristics
- conflict styles
|
|