-
Describe the reservation and disallowance power (2)
- 1. This allows the provincial lieutenant governor to reserve a law saying that they are reserving that legislation and sending it to the House of Commons to be debated and passed
- 2. This gave the federal government the power to veto any provincial law but it hasn't been used in a long time and they wouldn't dare to use it now.
-
What is significant about the preamble to section 91 of the BNA act? 2 points
- 1. It says that the federal government has the power to legislate, notwithstanding that list for the peace order and good government of Canada. So they can overrule the provinces if a law was not according to the peace order and good governance of Canada
- 2. The courts have largely discredited this power
-
What significant role did the federal government play after world war 2 that affected the provinces? (2)
- 1. The federal government wanted to establish the welfare states however most of the provisions of a welfare state or provincial including civil rights and property.
- 2. So in order for them to create a welfare state they had to negotiate with the provinces
-
Why did the federal government wants to create a welfare state and what did they do to get it?
In order to establish pen Canadian social benefits that were equal across the country they negotiated with the provinces and offered them money
-
what were the shared cost programs?
Federal government paid half and the provinces paid half for social programs at the beginning.
-
how can federalism be described today? (2)
- 1. The process of federalism is the mutual exchange of jurisdictional involvement in exchange for money.
- 2. Today there is an intricate relationship between federal and provincial government where the federal government's aims to provide leadership and they are confident that the Canadian people expect their social programs (which are provincial jurisdiction) to be in place.
-
How to central Canada see receives British Columbia as the spoilt child of Confederation British Columbia?
They see British Columbia as the spoiled child of Confederation
-
When was the Charlottetown Accord and why was British Columbia reluctant to sign?
Charlottetown Accord 1992
the recognition of Quebec as a distinct society was looked down upon by many British Columbians because they felt like they were also as distinct society from the rest of Canada
-
What sets British Columbia apart from the rest of Canada? 2 points
- 1. Icons and images of Canada as a winter country don't apply in British Columbia
- 2. British Columbia sees itself as a separate region from the other Western provinces based on landscape and economy
-
What was said about Mike Harcourt during the constitutional debates?
That he didn't fight as hard as Alberta and was criticized for not sticking up for BC
-
What has BC contributed to in a confederation? (5)
1. The citizens assembly on electoral reform
- minor thing
- 2. Regional districts for municipal structures since the 1960s
- 3. Grants law: requirement to pay for gasoline before you fill your tank
- 4. Insight : safe injection site
- 5. BC Alberta and Saskatchewan Free Trade Agreement TILMA - Trade Investment and Labour Mobility agreement which creates Canada's 2nd largest economy
-
Who has the jurisdiction over the Northern Gateway and kinder Morgan pipelines? 2 points
the federal government has jurisdiction over these two pipeline. The National Energy Board and the federal government makes the decisions and BC has no say in the process.
-
What are the two important issues when it comes to First Nations and government in BC?
- 1. human rights issues: moral and ethical issues in respect to treaties
- 2. economic issues: so much of the land in BC is still in dispute. All sorts of economic activity cannot proceed without negotiation with First Nations
-
What is the area in DC under the Canadian treaty system and what is the major issue there?
- North east of province is called treating 8
- It is a major oil and gas region. the Northern Gateway pipeline is proposed to go through this region and First Nations say that this will violate their treaty
-
how long have indigenous people been in BC and when did Europeans arrived and who were they? (3 groups)
- Indigenous people have been in BC since time immemorial.
- The first Europeans arrived in BC in 1774 to 75
- 1. Spanish navigators from Mexico began to map the coast
- Juan de Fuca, Valdez, Galliano and Langara
- 2. In 1774 British Captain Cook came to be BC
- In 1778 captain Vancouver came
- 3. Alexander Mackenzie came across Canada and arrived in Bella Coola in 1773 and relied heavily on indigenous people but never saw the land as belonging to the Aboriginal people.
* British Columbia was further from Britain than any other part of the Empire at that point in time
-
What was the significance for indigenous people when the Russians and the Americans sign the deal and for what and where was this deal signed?
Russia had claimed Alaska but you the United States was looking at Washington and Oregon. when the United States purchased Alaska from the Russians the boundary was at 54 40, but this split the Haida between Haida Gwaii and an island on the Alaskan side but there was no consideration for this
-
What did the British do to manage the migration of Western people into Canada?
In 1763 the British signed the Royal Proclamation which was the basis for signing treaties with Aboriginal people.
This came as a product of a military alliance between the British crown and the Six Nations of Iroqois during a war between the British and French. The French signed an alliance with the Huron.
-
What was the essence of the Royal Proclamation of 1763?
It was a recognition of the existence and ownership of the Aboriginal people to the land
-
what were the two different treaties signed in BC in the early days?
- 1. Treaty 8 in northeastern BC
- 2. The Douglas treaties: on the east coast of Vancouver Island. this includes the Nanaimo First Nation.
-
Explain the doctrine of discovery
The Catholic Church was the mediator on how wars would be resolved. one Christian king could not claim the territory of another Christian king, but between Christians and non believers this was acceptable. Therefore Aboriginal lamd was seen as open for claiming. BC was unclaimed by other Christian kings
-
What is the name of the language group on Vancouver Island?
Halquamalem
-
What is the issue with the much of the land on Vancouver Island?
- All of the land in the Halqqmelam group was given to private investors and BC is only able to negotiate with respect to crown land. therefore with no Crown land there is no basis for negotiations Sophie's first nations have been shut out of the possibility of a treaty negotiation.
- The inter-american court on human rights does not agree that the doctrine of discovery is valid and this group have tried to bring their case before this court
-
why is the province of BC an illegitimate jurisdiction?
Europeans showed up, had a dominant military. smallpox wiped out much of the populations and then Europeans set up their own structures.
-
What is the complication of federalism brings to negotiations with First Nations?
The federal government has jurisdiction over First Nations but the provinces claim the resources common to all negotiations have to be made between the federal government's the provinces and the First Nations and this makes things very difficult
-
when was the first European settlement in BC and where ?
1842 Fort Victoria was established. Fort George was earlier but it was only a trading post and not a permanent settlement.
-
When were the Douglas treaties signed?
In the 1840s and 1850s during the time when the first settlements were established and into the first gold rush
-
who was Joseph Trutch and what did he do?
He was responsible for land allocation and had a demeaning attitude towards First Nations and their claims. When BC entered Confederation the positive influence of Douglas had disappeared and in the terms of the union, he said that all aboriginal claims had been extinguished. the federal government was willing to accept this even though it wasn't true.
-
What is the potlatch and when was it banned?
- The potlatch our feast, ceremonies, dances where the host would give all their walk away to their guests. This was a way for the host to gain status among the community. This was central to their culture. The gifts were under an obligation to hold their own potlatches and to give something back again in the future.
- in 1885 the church's lobby the federal government to have the potlatch eliminated
-
List three eventsin which the government discriminated against first nations?
- 1. The potlatch was banned in 1885
- 2. In 1927 the federal government change the Envy an act to prevent lobbying and to prohibit indigenous people hiring lawyers to make land claims
- 3. Residential schools were also established in this period
-
What were two significant events that happened for First Nations directly after world war 2?
- 1. In 1949 Frank Calder was elected as an MLA from the Nisga'a In
- 2. In 1951 Canada reversed the prohibition of the potlatch and of the laws against hiring lawyers and lobbying for land claims.
-
What were the two questions in the Calder case and what were the results when brought to the Supreme Court?
- 1. Did Aboriginal title exist? On this question all six of the justices agreed.
- 2. If so, does it continue to exist. on this question they were split evenly so the Nisga'a lost because there was no majority
* the seven Supreme Court justice abstained because in order to sue the government you had to have the government's permission and this was a technicality
-
Why was the Calder case significant?
- Even though the Nisga'a lost. They succeeded in getting the court to admit the aboriginal title did exist. So therefore the federal government began to change its position on claims in BC, but they couldn't get far because the province had jurisdiction on resources
- The Calder case shifted the government's position from the Nile of Aboriginal claims to an acceptance of the existence of claims
-
What was the white paper and what was its significance?
In 1969 Pierre Trudeau and John Christian wanted to abolish the Indian Act and remove the federal government's responsibility for Aboriginal people. this would have eliminated the treaties. he wanted to turn indigenous people into ordinary Canadians
-
Why was there fierce reaction to the white paper and what was significant about this reaction? (2)
Even though it would have gotten rid of the Indian Act, it would have also removed the identities of indigenous people and this was not right. federal government therefore back down.
- 1. This brought Aboriginal people together to fight for their rights
- 2. and also got other Canadians to think about the positions of Aboriginal people
-
Explain the Guerin case and the results?
He was a chief in the Musqueam First Nation. this was at the mouth of the Fraser at UBC They allowed DIAND to lease one hundred and fifty acres of their land to the Shaughnessy Golf Club. The Indian agents leased their land way below market value so Guerin took the issue to the Supreme Court and argued that they should be compensated for the loss of revenue. The court ruled the original title continue to rest with Aboriginal people, not with governments. Aboriginal title existed inherently
-
What was the significance of the Guerin case?
The case determined the aboriginal title continue to exist, unless it was removed by a treaty.
|
|