-
reflexive self
what do you think of yourself
-
self-concept
- sum total of a person's thoughts and feelings that defines the self as an object
- explains situational behaviors
-
multiple selves
- besides who we are, we hold self-concepts of possible selves
- a possible self is who we want to be (desired selves) and who we ought to be (ought selves)
-
sources of self-knowledge
- introspection
- self-perception theory
- social comparison
-
introspection
- often difficult and incorrect
- we don't know what to conclude when looking inward
- ex: why are you happy? would you give shocks in an experiment?
-
self-perception
- we infer our own attitudes and feelings from attributions of our own behavior
- if i'm laughing, i must think it's funny
-
self-perception
- we infer our own attitudes and feelings from attributions of our own behavior
- if i'm laughing, i must think it's funny
-
Olson (1992)
- control: canned laughter has no effect
- contagious: canned laughter is contagious
- inhibits: canned laughter inhibits laughing
- ALL LAUGHED

-
Schachter's two-factor theory of emotion
- introspection first then self-perception
- - we notice an "arousal" (introspection)
- - we seek an attribution for this arousal (self- perception)
- causes you to infer your current emotion
-
example of Schachter's two-factor theory of emotion
-
self-evaluation is _______
- relative
- ex: upward comparison = other has higher test grade
- downward comparison = other has lower grade
-
social comparison
- Mr. Clean/Mr. Dirty
- job interview
- interact w/ Mr. Clean - upward comparison
- interact w/ Mr. Dirty- downward comparison
- then fill out self-esteem questionnaire
- Results: Mr. Clean > low self esteem
- Mr. Dirty > high self esteem
-
implications of social comparison
- people often ignore objective factors during evaluation
- ex: Campus as a “fish pond”: better to be a big frog in a small pond than a small frog in a big pond
-
interpersonal self
- people have selves to help them interact w/ other people
- having a self enables you to predict how others people will treat you
-
looking glass self
- we use others to perceive ourselves
- what we think other people think of us matters, not their actual thoughts
-
self-presentation
- we try to create a public self-image for others
- two main motives:
- - appear as positive as realistically possible
- - create an identity
-
self-handicapping
to help make favorable impressions, people sometimes deliberatley put barriers in their way
-
self-esteem
how we feel about ourselves
-
better than average effect
people see themselves as better than than average on any dimension
-
lake wobegon effect
all children are above average
-
unrealistic optimism
- believe that good things are more likely to happen to you than most other people and that bad things are less likely
- depressed people lack this
-
false consensus and uniqueness
overestimate or underestimate extent to which others think and act as we do
-
false consensus
tendency to overestimate the commonality of one’s opinions and one’s undesirable or unsuccessful behaviors
-
false uniqueness
tendency to underestimate the commonality of one’s abilities and one’s desirable or successful behaviors
-
executive self
- self's ability to make decision, initiate actions, and exert control over the environment
- people have need to feel like they have control over their lives
- - locus of control
- - meaning seeking
- - intrinsic motivation
-
locus of control
- the extent to which people perceive outcomes as internally controllable or due to chance or outside forces
- people with internal locus of control try harder, deal with setbacks better and are more successful
-
meaning seeking
- people believe that they can control event which are truly random
- try to find meaning in accidents
- people who find meaning cope better than people who don't
-
self-determination theory
when people feel like they have to do something they lose interest as soon as the reward is removed
-
Test-Operate-Test-Exit (TOTE)
- Test: Compare ideal with current state
- Operate: Perform an action to help reach ideal state
- Test: Effect of operation
- Exit: If at ideal, otherwise repeat cycle
-
depletion
after exerting self-control, people's level if strength is decreased
-
the self
- reflexive self: who you are
- interpersonal self: how you related to others
- executive self: how we choose between alternatives
-
prejudice and discrimination
- attitudes towards groups and members of that group
- - overgeneralized
- - inaccurate
- - resistant to change
-
components (stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination)
- stereotypes: cognitive component
- - beliefs
- prejudice: affective component
- - emotional reactions + discomfort
- discrimination: behavioral component
- - actions
-
stereotyping
- fixed way of thinking about people that doesn't allow for individual variation
- "types" of people
- foundation for prejudice but NOT prejudice
-
flick study
- people listen to audio tape of basketball game and focus on player named Mark Flick
- people were told he was black to some, white to others
- people who thought he was black said he played a better game, more athletic
- people who thought he was white said he hustled more and was a smarter player
-
prejudice
- hostile or negative attitudes towards others based on group membership
- emotional response
-
emotion and prejudice
emotions may be a better predictor of behavior than thoughts
-
discrimination
- hostile or negative acts towards others based on group membership
- behaviors do not always follow attitudes
- doesn't always come in negative attitude
- ex: real-estate agents may only show blacks to houses in black neighborhoods
-
discriminatory treatment
- handling violent patients in an all-white psychiatric hospital
- black patients more likely to get drugs at beginning than white patients
-
video game discrimination
- people were to respond if they saw a person with a gun
- people responded quicker to a black guy on screen
- weapon bias
-
stereotype threat
- besides clear negative outcomes, effects may be more subtle-stereotype threat
- awareness that anything one does may confirm a stereotype
- ex: black and white people given difficult english test and told that it was either to test stereotype threat or had nothing to do with it
- black people did worse when they thought they were being tested of stereotype threat
-
what causes prejudice
- social cognition account
- - thoughts
- self-esteem maintenance account (social dominance)
- - feelings
- realistic conflict account
- - behaviors
-
social cognition
- prejudice as the result of information processing
- the way we think and organize info can lead us to form negative stereotypes and apply them
- Many potential mechanisms:
- - out-group homogeneity
- - stereotype activation
- - illusory correlation
-
out-group homogeneity
- the perception that those in the out-group are more similar than they are
- "they" are all the same
- cognitive bias to see out-group members as alike
- may form the cognitive foundation to prejudice
-
stereotype activation
- the tendency for stereotypes to bias perceptions when they are "activated" by the situation
- everyone knows the stereotype and it may affect our behavior unconsciously when activated
- ex: when people overhear racist comment during debate b/t white and black person , they think the black person did a lot worse
-
illusory correlation
- believe that two variables are related when in fact they are not
- remember info that is consistent w/ our beliefs or stereotypes and forget inconsistent info
- pay attention to selected info
- - think of someone and they call, you think your psychic
-
illusory correlation
- read info about group A+B
- twice as much info on group A
- equal percentage of pos and neg about each group
- people think A is more positive
- pre-existing beliefs can blind people
-
esteem maintenance
prejudice as a motivation to fel good about the self
-
minimal group paradigm
way to test esteem motivation
-
in-group bias
- in minimal groups people selected to random groups
- people tend to favor people in their groups more
-
social dominance
- I feel good when "we" are on top
- example of esteem motivation
-
realistic conflict
- prejudice is not just something in our heads
- real conflicts exist in the world
- prejudice should rise and fall based on the amount of inter-group conflict present
- tough times (less resources) → more conflict
- Better times (more resources) → less conflict
|
|