-
Hierarchy of courts
- 1. US Constitution
- 2. Treaties (reqs. Pres + 2/3 senate; bypasses Congress)
- 3. Fed statutes
- 4. State constitutions
- 5. County/city ordinances
- 6. Private laws
-
Natural Law School
- If the law is not just it should not be followed
- You were born with natural rights
-
Historical Law School
Law is an evolutionary process of social customs which appreciates precedent to transmit important values to the next generation
-
Sociological Law School
- The law is a tool for social justice
- Use law to change societal norms
-
Other 2 schools of law you have to know
- Analytical
- Critical Legal Studies
-
Jurisdictional reqs
- 1. standing to sue
- 2. jurisdiction (2 ways)
- 3. venue
-
Standing to sue
Pt has to have suffered some injury or will be immediately injured
-
Jurisdiction (2 ways)
- 1. In personam: file suit where the person lives
- 2. In rem: jurisdiction over where the property is
-
Jurisdictional venue
- Cases heard by nearest court to the incident or where the parties reside
- Courts can transfer in interest of justice or convenience
- Forum shopping is bad
-
Alternative dispute resolutions
- Negotiation
- Mediation
- Arbitration
-
Negotiation
- Settlement discussions w/neutral 3rd party, usually an expert or specialist
- Enter voluntary settlement agreements
-
Mediation
- Neutral 3rd party assists, but usually meets with parties separately
- Cannot make a decision or award; just tells parties what a ruling will be, then parties hopefully resolve
-
Arbitration (2 kinds)
- Binding: arbitrator can state monetary damage and you can take that to court to bind judgment
- Non-binding: you can go to court to get it enforced; parties settle or go to trial/binding arbitration
-
Pleading components
- Complaint (Pt's action): Pt files a complaint, which initiates a lawsuit. Complaint + summons served to defendants
- Answer or Demurrer (Df's action): must be served upon court and Pt within statutory time. Answer - admit or deny; demurrer - even if facts as alleged by Pt are true, does not sustain cause of action sought
- Cross complaint
-
If Df fails to answer a complaint filed?
Pt can have a default judgment entered; now Pt only has to prove damages
-
Cross-complaint
- Pt -> cross-defendant
- Df -> cross-complainant
-
Discovery components
- Depositions
- Interrogations
- Request for admissions
- Production of documents
- Exams
-
Depositions
- Oral testimony before trial
- Preserves testimony (can be used if party is ill or dies before trial)
-
Interrogations
- Written questions; send and they reply back
- Form interrogatories: checklist of Q's; very vague and generalized
- Special interrogatories: limited to 35 Q's but ask whatever you want
-
Request for admissions
Ask them to admit or deny something
-
Production of docs
Request the other part to give all relevant documents except any privileged, attorney work product and docs protected by privacy rights
-
Exams (discovery)
- Make them get physical or mental exams
- Demand for Bill of Particulars: requires itemization of each cause of action and its monetary payment
-
Utilitarianism
Greatest good to society
-
Kantian
Reason should be used to determine how to behave
-
Supremacy clause
- Fed Constitution and fed. laws and treaties made pursuant to it are supreme law of the land
- Where congress has shown legislative intent to exclusively regulate an area/activity, any state law is preempted
-
Commerce clause
- Congress can regulate commerce of Native Americans, Foreign countries, and interstate
- Prevents states from taxing each other
-
Privileges and Immunities Clause
States cannot deprive citizens of other states of the privileges and immunities it affords its own citizens (except in-state tuitions)
-
States Regulatory Powers
Police: regulate own affairs within borders
-
Taxing and Spending Powers
Empowers Congress to levy taxes on all states
-
Freedom of Speech
- Applies to fed., state, local gov't
- Scope: freedom not to speak, to speak anonymously, symbolic speech
- Types of protection vary
-
Fully protected speech
- Cannot be regulated or stopped
- = anything not under limited or unprotected
-
Limited protection speech
- Gov't can place reasonable content-neutral time, place and manner restrictions on speech
- Offensive speech (F-word on TV at a certain time)
- Commercial speech (where you put the billboard)
-
Unprotected speech
- Gov't can absolutely forbid
- Dangerous
- Fighting words
- Incitement of illegal activity
- Defamation
- Child born
- Obscene (case-by-case)
-
Freedom of Religion
- Private? Do what you want. Public? No.
- Defined loosely as a "sincere belief in a supreme being"
- Establishment Clause
- Free exercise clause
-
Establishment Clause
- Gov't must be neutral
- Gov't can't establish a religion
- Gov't can't play favorites
-
Free exercise clause
- Gov't can't interfere with the exercise of a religion
- Freedom is not absolute (N. Americans trying to say smoking that drug is "religious")
-
Equal protection clause
States must treat similarly situated individuals in a similar manner
-
Strict Scrutiny
- Race, national origin, voting, domestic travel
- Law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling gov't purpose
-
Intermediate scrutiny
- Gender
- Law upheld if substantially related to a gov't purpose
-
Rational basis test
Law upheld if rationally related to a legitimate gov't interest
-
Due Process Clause
- Must be provided before a person's life, liberty or property is taken (2 types)
- Substantive: asks if gov't has an adequate reason to take the LLP
- --> fundamental right is limited --> strict scrutiny test (marriage, children, procreation and everything else under strict scrutiny)
- Procedural: gov't must provide notice and hearing reqs before person deprived of LLP
-
Which due process do you apply?
- Substantive: if law denies rights to everyone
- Equal protection: if law denies rights to some while allowing to others
-
Tort
- Wrongful act that injures another's body, property or reputation
- Pt's always seek monetary damages, sometimes punitive
-
Intent
Acts of omissions that are intended or could reasonably be expected to bring about the consequences of the tort
-
Transferred intent
- Tortfeasor intends to commit a tort against a person but either commits a different tort against that person or injures another person
- Tortfeasor held liable for intentional tort caused to victim
-
Assault
- Threat or action of imminent harm or offensive contact causing reasonable apprehension at the imminent harm
- Future harm? No, not an assault
- You have to be aware that it happened
-
Battery
- An intentional harmful or offensive contact to a person
- Direct or indirect contact OK
- You don't have to know it's happened
-
Negligence and components
- Failure to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to another that causes harm
- Duty of care
- Breach of duty
- Causation
- Harm
-
Duty of care
- A person must provide an amount of care that a reasonable person would, acting under similar circumstances; intent is irrelevant
- Children under 4 are incapable of negligence
- Statutory duty of care: defined by statute or case law
-
Breach of duty (all or nothing!)
- When a person fails to act as a reasonable person would under similar circumstances
- No duty to rescue someone in danger unless you caused the harm or there's a preexisting relationship
-
Negligence per se
Where a statute creates a duty of care and the person harmed is a class of person meant to be protected
-
Res ipsa loquitur
- The thing speaks for itself --> you don't know who caused the harm
- When parties unable to determine what Df did wrong then switches the burden of proof from Pt to Df to prove they were not negligent
- Requires that Df had exclusive control of instrumentality of situation that caused Pt's injury, and injury does not normally occur w/o negligence (think gauze left in someone during surgery)
-
Causation
- Actual cause: "but for" the Df's conduct would the accident have occurred?
- Proximate cause: is it "fair" for there to be liability under the circumstances
-
Harm
- Negligence reqs Pt to have suffered injury or damage to property
- Pure comparative negligence: Pt will recover even if at 99% fault
- Partial comparative negligence: Pt will only recover if 49% or less at fault; reduce this amount from Pt's recovery of damages
-
Strict liability
- Liability without fault
- A party will be liable regardless of intentions or exercise of reasonable care
- Cannot waive or disclaim
-
Animals
- Domesticated: no strict liability unless there is knowledge of a domesticated animal's dangerous propensity
- Wild: keepers strictly liable for any injury
-
Products liability applications
- Product must be somehow defective
- Not services; products only
- Applies to merchants only
-
Defect in manufacture
- If product is different and more dangerous than a properly made product
- Occurs when a manufacturer fails to properly assemble, test OR adequately maintain quality controls
-
Design defects
- When a Pt can prove there is an alternative design that is safer and is economically feasible
- Likelihood of harm > burden to manufacture and design safer products
-
Failure to warn
A product is inherently dangerous and cannot be made safer AND the product lacks an adequate and conspicuous warning label
-
Defect in packaging
Certain manufacturers owe a duty to childproof or tamperproof certain products
-
Failure to provide adequate instructions
If you fail at this, manufacturers and supply chain are liable
-
Trade secret
- Proprietary, confidential business secret that sets it apart from competitors
- Last indefinitely but owner must take ALL reasonable precautions to prevent it from getting out
- Lawful to reverse engineer
-
Patent
- Grants a property right to inventor with exclusive rights
- Designs, plants, or utilities
- 20 years (design for 14); begins from date application is filed
- If something was being used by the public for over a year, can't get a patent
- First-to-file rule
-
Patent reqs
- Novel - has not been invented or used in the past
- Useful
- Non-obvious or apparent to a reasonable person
-
Copyright durations
- Author's life + 70 years
- 95 years after publication or 120 years from creation
-
Trademarks/servicemarks reqs
- Distinctive, OR
- have acquired a secondary meaning (brand name that has evolved from an ordinary term)
- Must be used in commerce
- Duration: 10 years (can be renewed indefinitely)
-
Supreme court - Majority decision
When most of them agree on the outcome and reasoning
-
Supreme court decision - plurality
When they agree on the outcome but don't agree about the reasoning
-
Constitutional powers
- Federalism: where fed and state gov'ts share powers
- Enumerated: powers delegated to fed gov't from state
- Reserved: powers not specifically delegated to fed gov't are reserved to state gov'ts
-
Maximizing profits theory
The theory of business social responsibility that holds that a business owes duties solely to produce the highest return for its shareholders
-
Intervention
A pre-trial order when a court allows a third party to join a lawsuit in order to protect their interests
-
Federalism
State and fed gov'ts share powers
|
|