-
Physical Needs
- comm affects our personal health
- no social interaction has a negative effect on our health
-
Identity needs
- comm is the only way to help us learn who we are
- we define ourselves based on feedback from others
- comm gives us a sense of identity
-
Social Needs
- satisfies pleasure, affection, companionship, control and escape
- more socializing = more happiness
-
Practical Goals
- Instrumental goals - goals attained in getting others to act how I want
- eg. tell barber what hairstlye I want
- speak and listen effectively are keys in getting a job
- Maslow's Hierarchy - physiological (food, water, shelter), safety (protection from threats), social, self esteem (believe you are worthwhile), self actualization (develop our potential, best you can be)
-
Instrumental Goals
- goals attained in getting others to act how I want
- eg. tell barber what hairstlye I want
-
Maslow's Hierarchy
physiological (food, water, shelter), safety (protection from threats), social, self esteem (believe you are worthwhile), self actualization (develop our potential, best you can be)
-
Process of Comm.
Linear view, transactional view
-
Linear View
- Linear Comm. View - comm is characterized as a one way event in which message flows from sender to receiver
- Sender - person creating message
- Encodes - put thoughts into words/symbols
- Message - info transfer b/w sender and receiver
- Channel - medium through which message travels
- Receiver - one who notices and attends to message
- Decodes - receiver attaches meaning to message. Interpretation
- Noise - external, physiological or psychological distractions that interfere w accurate transmission and reception of message
- not accurate model b/c its a rigid one way event
-
Linear Comm. View
comm is characterized as a one way event in which message flows from sender to receiver
-
Sender
person creating message
-
Encodes
put thoughts into words/symbols
-
Message
info transfer b/w sender and receiver
-
Channel
medium through which message travels
-
Receiver
one who notices and attends to message
-
Decodes
receiver attaches meaning to message. Interpretation
-
Noise
external, physiological or psychological distractions that interfere w accurate transmission and reception of message
-
Transactional View
- Transactional Comm model - expands on linear model to better capture comm as a unique human process. Simultaneous send/receive. Ongoing process
- uses COMMUNICATOR instead of sender/receiver
- Environments - fields of expertise that reflect how well they understand one anothers behaviour. Not just location, personal experience. Not always obvious, but always a SHARED area. If area is too small comm is hard.
- noise resides w/i communicators
- Physiological Noise - biological factors that interfere. Pain, hunger, fatigue, visual problems, pounding heart, body temp, thirst, twitch, hearing loss.
- Psychological Noise - embarrassment, anger, disappointment, confusion. Forces w/i that interfere w/ the ability to understand a message accurately. Eg. student fails a test, so upset that he's unwilling to learn from mistakes.
- External - non verbal cues
-
Transactional Comm model
- expands on linear model to better capture comm as a unique human process. Simultaneous send/receive. Ongoing process
- uses COMMUNICATOR instead of sender/receiver
-
Environments
- fields of expertise that reflect how well they understand one anothers behaviour.
- Not just location, personal experience.
- Not always obvious, but always a SHARED area.
- If area is too small comm is hard.
-
Physiological Noise
- biological factors that interfere.
- Pain, hunger, fatigue, visual problems, pounding heart, body temp, thirst, twitch, hearing loss.
-
Psychological Noise
- embarrassment, anger, disappointment, confusion.
- Forces w/i that interfere w/ the ability to understand a message accurately.
- Eg. student fails a test, so upset that he's unwilling to learn from mistakes.
-
-
Interpersonal Comm
- continuous transactional process involving participants that have different but overlapping environments and create relationships through exchange of messages
- affected by physiological and psychological noise
- SHARED MEANING through interaction w/ human beings
- w/o shared meaning, zero comm happens
-
Comm can intentional or intentional
- some is intentional - asking a big favor, criticism
- some is unintentional - someone eavesdrops, nonverbal comm - a sigh
-
Comm is irreversible
- we all say things we regret
- words said and deeds done are irreversible
-
Its Impossible not to comm
- speak or remain silent, info is provided
- we constantly send messages
- miscomm is when your meaning is not understood by receiver
- more understanding of receiver = better comm b/c meaning is understood
-
Comm is Unrepeatable
- impossible to recreate an event
- some words and actions have a different meaning all the time b/c growth is occuring
-
Comm has content and relational dimension
- Content Dimension - info explicitly discussed. Eg turn left
- Relational Dimension - how parties FEEL towards one another. Eg 2 ways of saying "your turn to..."
- sometimes we don't care about relation. eg. food server just brings food
-
Content Dimension
- info explicitly discussed.
- Eg turn left
-
Relational Dimension
- how parties FEEL towards one another.
- Eg 2 ways of saying your turn to do the dishes. Nice vs. demeaning
-
More comm is better (misconceptions)
- can be unproductive
- too much can generate a (-) response
-
Meanings are in words (misconceptions)
meanings are interpreted different by others
-
Successfu comm always involve shared understanding (misconceptions)
you can lie to friends to save feelings
-
single person or event causes reaction
comm is transactional (human process) therefore not one event causes a reaction
-
Comm can always solve all problems (misconceptions)
eg. complaining to teacher about grade, doesn't solve problem
-
Nature of Interpersonal Comm
- has 2 views
- Quantitative
- Qualitative
-
Quantitative
- number of people involved
- interaction b/w people, usually face to face
- Dyad - 2 people interacting = dyadic comm
- in quantitative sense, dyad and interpersonal comm are interchangeable
-
Qualitative
- development of unique rules and roles
- 1. Rational culture. eg. diss friends, more formal w/ others
- 2. irreplacability, unique and can not be replaced
- 3. interdependance - others experiences affect you as well
- 4. disclosure of personal info. thoughts and feelings
- 5. intrinsic rewards - spend time w/ friends and loved ones b/c its rewarding
-
Personal/Impersonal
balancing actmost relationships in b/w the two. can't have too much of a good thing
-
mediated comm
- use of computer based tools for human interaction
- Benefits - can meet new friends, more personal relationships. More globalized network.
- Not a replacement to face to face, can promote and reinforce it
- Challenges - leaner messages. Lack of non verbal cues, therefore hard to interpret and easily misunderstood.
- Disinhibition.
- Permanence, nothing goes away on the internet
-
Disinhibition
send message w/o thinking of consequences. This has two forms, people offer personal info (facebook), and people are more critical than they would be if they were face to face
-
Comm competence
- accomplish personal goals and enhance relationship
- no ideal way to comm.
- how to learn? Watch effective models, watch and learn
-
Competence is situational
- good w/ friends, bad w/ strangers
- we have areas of competence. eg. good w/ young people, bad w/ adults
-
Competence is relational
- something w/ not to others
- is approach effective in eyes of receiver?
- behavior not always appropriate in every situation
-
Competence can be learned
anyone can learn these skills
-
Wide range of behaviours
need a big repertoire of comm tools to help handle situationsable to adapt
-
ability to choose most appropriate behaviour
context, goal, and knowledge influence how you act
-
skill at performing behaviours
knowledge and put it into practice
-
Cognitive Complexity
- construct variety of frameworks for viewing an issue
- consider issue from several angles
- critical thinking - explore possibilities and angles
-
Empathy
- project oneself into anothers perspective
- experience someone elses thoughts and feelings
- most important aspect of competent comm.
-
Self monitoring
- attending to your own behaviour and use these observations to shape the way you behave
- being aware of behaviour and the impression it has
-
Commitment
people who car communicate better than people who dont
-
Stages in learning good comm.
- 1. Beginning awareness.
- 2. Awkward
- 3. Skilled
- 4. Integrated
-
Intercultural comm.
- comm w/ people from different backgrounds
- inevitably we will comm w/ these people
- what is considered competence by some is not to others
- To do it effectively, need 3 things.
- 1. Motivation
- 2. Tolerance for ambiguity
- 3. Open mindedness
-
1. Motivation (intercultural comm)
willingness to comm. and reach out
-
2. Tolerance for ambiguity (intercultural comm)
- accept ALL types of messages
- eg. being quiet can be friendly to some cultures
-
3. Open mindedness
- passive observation
- active strategies - eg. read watch films, ask q's
- self disclosure - talk about self to get more out of others
|
|