-
3 branches of government
- Legislative
- Executive
- Judicial
-
Enabling Act
created administrative agencies through delegation of authority
-
Ways to attack the decision of an Administrative Agency
- Fraud
- Agency abused their discretion
- There was bad faith
- Intentional wrong doing
- No substantial evidence ot support decision
- Decision based on malice, bribery, prejudice
- Decision was arbitrary and capricious
- Unreasonable
- Unconstitutional
-
Overturn Administrative agency decision based on constitutionality
Can attack the enabling act (too broad, too vague)
Can attack the regulations
-
Crime
Act (Actus Reas)
Intent (Mens Rea)
-
Types of criminal intent
- Specific intent
- General intent
- Gross negligence
- Ordinary negligence
- None
-
Some crimes don't require intent
- Drug offenses
- Traffic offenses
- Nuisance
-
Some crimes require intent but no act
- Conspiracy
- Attempted crimes
-
Homicide
Killing of a living human being
-
Non-Criminal Homicide
- Justifiable Homicide
- Excusable Homicide
-
Justifiable homicide
In performance of a legal duty
(police officer, executioner, etc.)
-
Excusable Homicide
- By accident (not negligence)
- Self-Defense
- Killer Lacks Capacity
-
McNaughton test of insanity
Right + Wrong Test
- a person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his/her actions
- Person is unable to distinguish right + wrong
- Mental Disease (reason for being unable to do a+b)
-
4 Tests to determine insanity
- McNaughton Test
- Irresistable impulse test
- Durham Test
- Model Penal code
-
Criminal Homicide
- Murder
- Voluntary Manslaughter
- Involuntary Manslaughter
- Negligent Homicide
-
Murder (With Malice aforethought)
- intent to kill or cause great bodily harm
- (general intent)
- willful act tending to cause great bodily harm
- felony murder
-
Voluntary Manslaughter
- Intentional but under sudden adequate provocation
- Was not planned
-
Involuntary Manslaugther
- Gross Negligence
- e.g. drag racing
-
Negligent Homicide
driving 10 miles over the speed limit and killing someone
-
Burglary
Entering occupied structure
-
Breaking and Entering
Entering unoccupied structure
-
Running sentences Concurrently
Doing them at the same time
e.g. sentenced to 5 and 3 year sentence, only stay in jail 5 years
-
Running sentences Consecutively
Complete one sentence then do the next
e.g. sentenced to 5 and 3 year sentences, stay in jail for 8 years
-
Types of Torts
- Intentional
- Negligence
- Strict Liability
-
Crimes and Torts with same names
- Assault
- Battery
- Trespass
- Nuisance
-
Intentional Torts
- To the person
- To property
- To economic relations
- Other intentional torts
-
Other Intentional Torts
- Intentional infliction of mental/emotional distress
- Fraud + Deceit
- Invasion of Privacy
- Malicious prosecution
- Abuse of process
-
Intentional Tort to the person
- Assault
- Battery
- False imprisonment
-
Assault
Intentionally placing someone in fear or apprehension of immediate physical harm
-
Battery
- Intentional touching that results in injury
- (poisoning, bullet, etc.)
-
False Imprisonment
intentionally detaining someone against their will
-
Intentional tort to property
- Trespass to land
- Conversion
- Trespass to personal property (chattels)
- Waste
-
Trespass to Land
- Unpermitted intrusion onto someone's land
- does not require intent, only voluntary action
-
Conversion
- Intentionally depriving someone of their personal property
- If you sue for this you can only sue for legal remedy (Damages= money)
-
-
Personal Property
- Can be tangible like a chair
- Gasses + Liquids
- intangible like copyrights, patents, checks, stocks
-
Criminal Case requirement
- beyond a reasonable doubt
- ~95%
fine, imprisonment, death
-
Legal Case requirement
- Preponderance of the evidence
- 50%
legal remedy (damages)
-
Equity (no jury)
- Clear and Convincing evidence
- ~75%
- Equitable remedies (extraordinary)
- Injunction-stop someone from doing something
- permanent, preliminary, restraining order
-
Equitable Remedies
- Recission
- Reformation
- Specific Performance
- Mandamus
- makes them do something
-
Larceny
Taking and carrying away of personal property of another with the intent to steal it
-
Defense to Trespass to land
easement: right of way
-
Bona Fide Purchaser (innocent purchaser)
- gives value
- in good faith
- without notive
-
Waste
Intentional injury to someone's future interest in the property
-
Intentional tort to economic relations
- Disparagement
- Unfair competition
- interference
-
Disparagement
- harming quality of someone's product
- Questioning their ownership
-
Unfair competition
using trade secrets unfairly
-
Interference
interfering with someone's business
e.g. putting snakes in their store
-
Intentional infliction of mental/emotional distress
killing someone's child in their presence
-
Reckless infliction of mental/emotional distress
Child killed by drunk driver in your presence
-
Negligent infliction of mental/emotional distress
fall asleep at the wheel and kill someone
-
Fraud and Deceit
- Misrepresentation
- of a material fact
- knowledge or reckless indifference to the truth
- reliance (normal person would believe it)
- injury
-
Invasion of Privacy
peeping tom, binoculars, someone using your picture to sell something without your consent
-
Malicious prosecution
intentional abuse of the criminal justice system
-
Abuse of process
abuse of civil justice system
-
Defenses to Intentional Torts
- Lack of Intent (not for trespasing and mental/emotional distress)
- Consent
- Privilege
-
Consent
- Express: oral or written
- Implied: based on conduct (in sports you are bound to have intentional touching AKA battery)
-
Negligent torts
- Duty of Care
- Breach of Duty
- Proximate Cause (when something causes the injury)
- Substantial Injury
-
To break Chain of Causation event must be:
- Intervening
- Unforseeable
- Independant
-
Defenses to Negligence
- Contributory Negligence
- Comparative Negligence
- Assumption of the risk
- Unavoidable accident
- Doctrine of last clear chance
-
Contributory Negligence
Both parties are at fault so the plaintiff gets nothing
-
Comparative Negligence
- Juries assign percentages of the fault
- In OH if plaintiff is more at fault than defendant he gets nothing
- In other states once they are both equally at fault the plaintiff gets nothing
-
Assumption of the risk
The plaintiff knew of the specific danger
-
Unavoidable Accident
You couldn't have avoided it so you are not at fault
-
Doctrine of last clear chance
- plaintiff's defense to defendant's defense
- the person who had the last clear chance to avoid injury is liable
- in states with contributory negligence
-
3 levels of negligence
- Negligence- burden of proof lies with P
- Res Ipsa Loquitor- thing speaks for itself
- Negligence Per Se- jury can't possibly conclude anything other than that the defendant is negligent
-
Strict Liability
- Animals
- Extrahazardous activities or things
- Common Carries and Innkeepers
- Warrantees with Goods (product liability)
- Vicarious Liability
- Dram Shop Acts
- Defamation (almost always intentional tort)
-
Extrahazardous activities or things
attractive nuisance-something on your property that is likely to attract small children, if they get hurt you are liable
-
Warrantees with goods
- Tangible personal property
- good is defective
- which originated with the manufacturer
- and the defect caused the injury
-
Vicarious Liability
- Respondeat Superior-resonpsible for employees
- principal responsible for agent as long as agent was acting within the scope of authority
- Not liable if they were exceeded their authority
-
Dram Shop Acts
- A bartender is supposed to cut off someone who is really drunk, if they don't and that person hurts someone they are liable too
- Also applies to private parties
-
Defamation
- false or creates false impression
- published
- injury to reputation
- Defense is consent and privilege
-
Defenses to Strict Liability Torts
Assumption of the risk
e.g. use product you know is defective; sneak into blasting zone and get hurt
|
|