Home
Flashcards
Preview
Cases
Home
Get App
Take Quiz
Create
Jackson
v Attorney General
Jackson v Attorney General
2005 UKHL 56
A v
Secretary of State for the Home Department
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
2004 UKHL 56
Thoburn v
Sunderland City Council
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
2003 QB 151
Laws LJ Constitutional Acts
Mgana Carta
Bill of Rights 1689
Acts of Union 1707
the Reform Acts
HRA 1998
Scotland Act 1998
Govt of Wales Act 1998
ECA 1972
What did Law LJ say made these constitutional acts different in Thoburn v Sunderland City Council?
They were protected from implied repeal - if parliament wanted any successor act to repeal them then they would have to be explicit
R (Al-Skeini & Others) v
Secretary of State for Defence
R (Al-Skeini & Others) v Secretary of State for Defence
2007 UKHL 26
Al-Skeini
No geographical limitation to the HRA & ECHR but applied where a state had effective control (e.g. embassies military bases overseas)
A & Others V Secretary of State for the Home Depertment 2004 UKHL 56
That ATCSA 2001 was incompatible with Articles of ECHR
Author
Anonymous
ID
20403
Card Set
Cases
Description
Cases
Updated
2010-05-23T15:59:04Z
Show Answers
Home
Flashcards
Preview