-
Robber Barons
Incredibly wealthy people who become that way by unethical means (implying thay steal from the poor)
-
Rockefeller
created a monopoly over the oil industry
-
Antitrust Laws a.k.a anti-monopoly law
seek to make businesses compete fairly and prevent monopolies
-
Sherman Act (1890)
- 1. must show ACTUAL monoploy violation
- 2. not very specific
- 3. applied to labor unions
- 4. criminal sanctions
-
litigate
to carry on a legal contest by judicial process
-
Reasons for Competition
- 1. encourages innovation in new products
- 2. prices tend to drop in competitive market
- 3. fair distributions of income to all parties
-
Purpose of Antitrust laws
- 1. Encourage large number of competitors
- 2. PREVENT MONOPOLY
- 3. Provide workable competitionw (only room for a few competitors)
- 4. Prevent accumulation of economic power/wealth (ex: only two companies build commercial air crafts)
-
Ethical Issues with Antitrust laws
- people don't believe that govt. should be used to put a cap on how wealthy a person can become SO antitrust laws should not be crossed to become wealthy.
- IF YOUR NOT CROSSING THE LINE THERE IS NO CAP!
-
Sherman Act Provisions
- 1. Prevent a Monopoly
- 2. Illegally enter into a CONTRACT IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
-
Contract in restraint of trade
- a contract agreeing not to compete
- (Microsoft vs. DELL)
-
Sherman Act sanctions
- Criminal Sanctions-a fine against corporation or executives face jail time
- Equitable Sanctions-injunctions or divestiture
- Treble Damages
-
Treble Damages
if you can prove damage by a company and that they were violating the Sherman Act you will get the amount of damages x 3.
-
injunctions
required by court to refrain from certain behaviors/acts
-
divestiture
order to an offending party to rid itself of property in order to prevent a monopoly
-
Who uses treble damages?
- Competitiors (use it most)
- Customers
- Attorney General
- (Walmart vs Vitamins)
-
Sherman Act Pleas
- Guilty
- Not Guilty
- Nolo Contendere
- Plea of Guilty or a conviction (prima facie cases for treble damages)
-
Is price fixing a contract in restraint of trade?
Yes
-
Rule of reason (1911)
- NOT every contract in restraint of trade is illegal.
- Prevents thats that are an "unreasonable" restraint of trade
- (fondu restaurant contract not to compete allowed because of rule of reason)
-
Price fixing
- ALWAYS illegal whether prices are fair and unreasonable or not
- Includes dividing up market territories or limiting supply (causes prices to rise)
-
collusion
agreeing on a price
-
problems with collusion
- eliminates competition
- what is beneficial today may not be tomorrow
-
Clayton Act (1914)
- 1. easier to prove a violation
- 2. sanctions not criminal (can't put in jail for what has not yet been done)
- 3. FTC may enforce
- 4. Justice department can enforce
- 5. antitrust laws do NOT apply to labor unions
-
Clayton Act Section 8
Interlocking directories
-
Interlocking Directories
one person can't be on the board of two corporations if they are or have been competitors (could result in price fixing)
-
Clayton act section 2
Price Discrimination
-
Price Discrimination
- Unlawful for seller to discriminate in price where effect MSLC or TCM
- NOT EFFECTIVE SECTION of clayton act
-
What act amended section 2 of the clayton act?
Robinson-Patman Act
-
Where do you find price discrimination?
Robinson-Patman Act
-
A&P gorceries
unlawfuly sold at low prices to drive out competitors and then raised the prices after the mom n' pop shops went out of business.
-
Price discrimination Affirmative defense
- Cost difference (shipping)
- Manafacture ( may cost more or less for other people)
- Administrative (no overhead)
- Changing Conditions (prices are constantly changing)
-
Clayton Act Section 3
Tying Contracts
-
Tying contracts
- unlawful to sell of lease a product tied to another whre effect might be to SLC or TCM
- generally unlawful when one product is pattened
- (salt processing machines)
-
"full-line forcing"
- requires purchaser to purchase full line of products in order to get major product.
- (chicken delight case)
-
Clayton act section 7
Mergers
-
Mergers
no comopany may acquire stock of assets of another company if is MSLC or TCM
-
Clayton Act merger guidlines
- Horizontal Mergers
- Vertical Mergers
- Conglomerate Mergers
- Product Extesion Mergers
-
Horizontal Merger
two companies merge
-
vertical mergers
By directly merging with suppliers, a company can decrease reliance and increase profitability
-
conglomerate merger
firms to want to merge, to increase market share, synergy and cross selling. Firms also merge to diversify and reduce their risk exposure. However, if a conglomerate becomes too large as a result of acquisitions, the performance of the entire firm can suffer.
-
FTC Act 1914 (section 5)
prohibits entities from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in interstate commerce
-
incipiency
stop a violoation before it has happened (section 5)
-
Section 5 sanctions
- cease and desist order
- daily fine
- consent order (order to stop/injunction)
- settlement
-
FTC issues trade regulations/rules regarding entire industry
- health hazard warning for cigarettes
- leak-proof battery
-
unfair methods of competition
methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.
-
Deceptive trade practices
"regular price" or manafactures' list price may only be used if it regularly sells at that price
-
FTC Vs Mary Carter Paint
- is the second item really free?
- Mary Carter lost for deception, pain was originally less so the free gallon was actually $2
-
"Bait and Switch"
run ad at low price (bait), bait runs our so you offer more expensive alternative (switch).
-
Disparagement
- making the bait look worse that other products by upselling alternative items.
- (subtle form of bait and switch)
-
Recend Developments in Trade Practice Regulation
- Corrective Advertising
- Advertising Substantiation
- Comparative Advertising
-
Corrective Advertising
- Must reverse deception and let consumers know the truth.
- Ads must be replace in all the same spots until the same amount of money is spent.
-
Advertising Substatiation
- Proof of claim
- Mock-ups can be use in advertising but not to establish proof
-
Good Mock-up
Ice cream ads
-
Bad Mock-up
Campbell's alphabet soup
-
Comparative Advertising
- became legal more recently
- (french fry wars)
-
fool test
way for FTC to decide if the advertisement is breaking some regulations
-
Fair Labor Standards Act
- 1938
- Restricted child labor and set wages for first tme
-
Workers Compensation Recovery
- Loss of income 60%-70% of normal pay
- Death Benefit for family
- permenant/partial disability by shcedule lump sum check
- Medical benefits
-
Workers Comp.
- state law so different w/in each state
- eliminated defenses for employers
-
Employer defense before workers comp
- assumption of risk
- contributory negligence
- fellow servant doctrine (negligence of another employee caused injury so suit is served to them)
-
result of workers comp.
employer passes cost on to product increasing prices in order to cover the new cost of wokers comp.
-
American Federation of Labor
- 1866
- after slump in 1930 membership tripled by 1936
-
Wagner Act
- 1935
- Was passed because employers had too much power
-
Wagner Act Legislation
- gave employees rights to organize and bargain effectively
- outlawed unfair labor practices of employers (yellow dog contracts & black list)
- Created nation labor relations board
-
Because of the Wagner Act Employers Can't do what?
- refuse to bargain in good fith with employees
- interfere with efforts to join union
- dominate union
- discriminate against union members
- agree with union to SECONDARY BOYCOTT
-
Conflicts between LAbor & Management
- Yellow-Dog Contracts
- Black List
- Lock-out
-
Yellow dog contract
contratc between employer and employee that the employee will not join the labor union
-
black list
prohibited members of labor union from being hired.
-
lock out
- still legal today
- employer locks out employees because they know they uion is going to go on strike
-
Taft Hartley Act
- 1947
- union members were gaining too much power after WWII so congress reacted with this act
-
What unfair practices by labor unions did the Taft Hartley Act put an end to?
- refusal to bargain in good faith
- coercing employee to join union
- causing an employer to discriminate agains non-union members
- secondary boycott
- requirement of excessive fees
- featherbedding
-
feather bedding
unions making employers pay people even if there is no job for them to do
-
80 day cooling-off period
president can issue if a union strike can affect national defense
-
what does the NLRB do?
- supervise union elections
- ajducated charges
- jurisdiction over interstate commerce
- "cease and desist" order
-
Landrum-Griffin Act
- 1959
- resulted from hearings of the Senate committee on improper activities in the fields of labor and management, which uncovered evidence of collusion between dishonest employers and union officials.
-
Bill of Rights for Union Members made what possible?
- participate in elections
- free expression
- vote on dues
- sue union
- fair hearing before diciplinary action
- could see a copy of collective bargaining agreement
|
|