-
Functional Language Approach
language is...
view
- a social tool
- a dynamic process
- intervention needs to move beyond language itself to include better communication
- no longer view child as solely the problem
-
language impairments
Apply to a heterogeneous group of developmental disorders, acquired disorders, delays or any combination of these, principally characterized by deficits and/or immaturities in the use of spoken or written language for comprehension and/or production purposes that may involve the form, content or function of language in any combination
-
language problems often persists because..
the topcs covered in class are often decontextualized.
-
traditional approach
- tight structure
- trainer orientes
- child as passive learner
- uses stimulus-response reinforcement model
- problems with generalization
- often forgets pragmatics
-
pragmatics
the reasons that we use language
-
functional approach
- child has more control
- decreased strusture
- attempts to mirror lanugage-learning environment of typically developing children
-
does functional or traditional have better results?
- functional approach has better overall results
- longer mean length of utterance and better behavior, etc.
-
pragmatics is the relationship between..
communicative partners & form and meaning of language being used
-
functional approach considers pragmatics which
- shift focus from treatment of symptoms to the process of communication
- serves as the organizing framework of language
- moves from entity approach to systems/holistic approach
-
entity appraoch
- uses discreet bits to try to teach children to properly communicate.
- ex) STARCS
- often it breaks down the task so small that it does not even resemble actual language
-
As SLPs we must always consider..
- the context in which we do things
- ex) playing with a barn won't work for an inner city child that has never seen one
- ex) autistic children have a hard time imagining things so don't ask them to
-
generalization
ongoing interactive process od clients and of their newly acquired language feature with the communication environment
-
some reasons that generalization may not occur
- taught out of context (pretending for autistic children)
- doesn't represent the child's communication functions or linguistic knowledge and experiences (playing with a barn for an inner city kid)
- presents to few communication opportunities (not enough practice)
- simplified too much causing it to be out of context
-
two types of generalization
- content generalization
- context generalization
-
content generalization
- child with Language Intervention induces language rule from examples and actual luse
- affected by targets chosen for training and by specific training items
- what we are working on
- ex) vocab, verbs, two step directions
-
context generalization
- child uses new feature within everyday communicatin
- facilitated when training and natural environements are similar
- where we are working on these things and who we are working on them with
- ex) playground, school, home, peers, teachers
-
scope
language rules with broad scope generalize more easily than do more restricted
-
choosing you training targets and items
- based on needs and interests of each child within environments
- it must be meaningful, authetic, motivating, and interesting
- functional and useful to child
- goal to increase effectiveness of child-initiated communication
- target linguistic forms across several functions
-
what is a big influencer of generalization
child's prior knowledge
-
considerations for context generalization
- language facilitators - who is going to be communicating with this child
- training cues
- consequences
- location of training
-
language facilitators
- parents, teachers, aides, SLPs
- the role of the SLP changes from programmer of child's environment to viewing communication partners as clients to acting as a consultant
-
training cues
- there is an initiation heirarchy (start with least intrusive to most intrusive)
- should support initiation and response
- train through linguistic and nonlinguistic cues
-
consequences
- how we reinforce.. want social not tangible reinforcements
- use intermittent reinforcement
- you must remain enthusiastic and authentic about your reinforcement
- no using empty praise such as good talking
-
location of training
- ideally trained in the environment
- use incidental teaching approach = train in environments where the language is used
-
social reinforcement
when we congratulate them in a real way that celebrates their communication
-
maximizing generalization
- best generalization = consequences related directly to language utterance and communication function of child
- avoid empty praise
- use response modes that demonstrate acceptance and redirection of child's utterance and maintain conversational flow
- must be socially appropriate and authentic
- use daily activities as your frame
-
evidence based practice
- clinical decision making informed by a combination of scientific evidence, clinical experience, and client needs
- decision making processes in EBP
-
decision making processes in EBP
- determine the info needed and ask the correct clinical question
- find studies that address the clinical question
- determine the level of evidence and critically evaluate studies
- evaluate the info for the specific case in question
- integrate the info and make decisions
- evaluate teatment outcomes to measure efficacy
|
|