-
real basic diff betwen neurologic and orthopedic systems
neuro is less well understood, and it'll give subjective and objective data
-
why do a PT neuro eval?
- PT diagnosis not same as MD diagnosis
- ex. PT says MS is a disease of mobility, MD says it's of demyelination
most of all, do a neuro eval to figure out what to treat, to choos correct interventions
-
objectives of neuro eval/exam
- ID if disease process or impairment is impacting the nervous system
- localize the lesion - recognize patterns and deduce pathology
-
4 categoris in Nagi model of disablement
Pathology. Impairment. Function. Society.
-
Pathology, in the Nagi model of disablement
def, and what it is in stroke, TBI, Parkinsons, MS
- the underlying disease/defect occuring at cellular level
- stroke: impaired BS to CNS due to thrombo-embolus or bleed
- TBI: acute trauma to brain
- Parkinsons: damage to substantia nigra
- MS: autoimmune CNS demyelination
PTs don't really treat at the cellular level
-
Impairment, in the Nagi model of disablement
disruption of a motor, sensory, or cognitive process
ex: spasticity, sensory loss, bradykinesia (slow movement), fatigue, thermosensitivity
PT usted to be here
-
Function, in Nagi model of disablement
- the functional limitation
- ex. inability to walk, balance, reach, stand, etc. ...
PT is here
-
Society in the Nagi model of disablement
disability - decreased ability or inability to perform social roles
ex: parenting, work
This is where PT should go.
-
In a PT eval, each of the following look at what?
Impairment level
Functional limitation
Disability
- Impairment level - sensory, motor, spatisticity, ROM, etc
- Functional limitation - gait, balance, transfers
- Disability - QOL measures, self report measures
-
charactersistics of lesions
- focal vs diffuse
- CNS vs PNS
- upper motor neuron vs lower motor neuron
- dermotomal/myotomal vs non dermotomal/myotomal
- nervous system vs other
-
the thing about UMNs and CNS
all upper motor neuron lesions are in the CNS
can have CNS damage w/o UMN lesion
-
focal, diffuse, multifocal, focal + diffuse lesions
- focal - lesion in one spot, maybe due to a stroke
- diffuse - spread over wider area of brain, maybe due tue a big stroke or a disease like alzheimer's
- multifocal - seen in MS or trauma
- focal + diffuse - trauma creates a focal one on site of impact, it runs thru brain to make another focal one on opposite side, and all in the middle it's diffuse
-
5 locations for lesions in the CNS
- cortical
- subcortical
- cerebellar
- basal ganglia
- spinal cord
-
4 locations for lesions in the PNS
- anterior horn cell
- nerve root
- plexus
- peripheral nerve
in a muscle exam you look for it in peripheral nerve, NMJ, and muscle itself -- says another slide
-
4 keys to examination
- observation
- subjetive history (pt and fam)
- med record
- know when to refer
-
reliability vs validity
reliability - is test repeatable (inter-rater reliablility - diff raters get same results. intra-rater reliability - same rater gets same results)
validity - does test measure what it claims to
-
sensitivity
- ability to pick up various signs and symptoms of pathology
- ex: high BBS accurately predicts fall risk
-
specificity
- ability to rule out other pathologies
- ex: low BBS accurately predicts low falls risk
-
elements in subjective history
- age, R or L handedness, occupation
- chief complaint (CC)
- HPI (history of present illness)
- PMH/PSH (previous medical/surgical history)
- medications
- SH (social history - support system)
- family history - involvement, support from fam
-
elements to look for in Chief Complaints (CC)
- nature of problem
- localized vs diffuse (pain only under specific conditions vs constant)
- onset (when symptoms began, not when diagnosis was made)
- frequency
- duration (how far can pt walk? how long does pain last?
- severity
-
what to get in HPI (history of present illness)
- chronology
- date onset
- what worsens or improves symptoms
- what can't you do that you could do before?
-
what to look for in PHM/PSH
- illnesses, injuries
- hospitalizations, surgeries
- meds, medical treatments
- other conditions that can be associated w chang in neurologic status (cardiac...)
-
what we focus on in an eval - 8
- motor, sensory, cerebellar, balance/gait (mobility)
- cranial nerve (involves vestibular system)
- cognitoin, perception, language
-
objective info in neuro eval
- observation
- arousal
- posture
- appearance
- motor patterns
- speech patterns
- behaviour
-
motor exam looks at these 3 things
- muscle strength (force output)
- muscle function (tasks)
- motor control (nervous system-muscle relationship ie rel btwn brain and movement)
-
in muscle exam look for these 3 points
- symmetry - is there wasting on one side?
- hypertrophy/pseudohypertrophy - in muscular dystrophy a muscle will look big but it's just connective tissue in the muscle belly
- atrophy
-
4 points to assess in motor exam when pt's doing AROM
- movement to command
- synergies (normal movement patterns - the expected poetry/grace)
- strength (MMT)
- equal mvmnt on both sides
-
tone
a normal resting state of a muscle, created by ongoing activation of muscle units
resting tone increases if you just did a strenuous exercise
-
2 types of decreased tone, 3 of increased
- decreased: hypotonia, flaccidity
- increased: hypertonia, spasticity, rigidity - if it's increased, you know there's CNS involvement
-
his 5 word def of spasticity
velocity dependent reaction to stretch
-
spasticity
- velocity dependent reaction to stretch
- increased "gain" of the stretch reflex - so if you do a quick stretch it responds quicker and stronger than we'd like, - the muscle jerks into contraction
- hallmark of UMN syndrom
-
extensor spasticity
flexor spasticity
extensor spasticity - seen when you try to move a limb into flexion (so you're stretching the extensor muscle, and it'll respond by jerking you back towards ext. - think of the tricep)
flexor spasticity - arises when you try to quickly extend a limb, stretching the flexor
-
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
describe 0, 1, and 1+
MAS tests for presence of spasticity under certain conditions
- 0 - no increase in tone
- 1 - slight increase in tone - catch and release or minimal resistance at the end of the ROM when the affected part is moved into flex or ext
- 1+ - slight increase in muscle tone - catch and release followed by minimal resistance thru remainder (less than half) of ROM
-
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
describe 2, 3, 4
- 2 - more marked increase in muscle tone (no catch and release) thru most of ROM but affected part moves easily
- 3 - considerable increase in muslce tone, passive motion difficult
- 4 - affected par rigid in flex or ext
-
MAS lookes at spaticity in these 8 sites
elbow, writst, fingers, thumb, hamstrings, quads, gastroc, soleus
-
limitations of MAS
- neglects shoulders and trunk
- doesn't look at spasticity during functional exercises
- useful for research, maybe not for making clinical decisions
- ignores how spasticity changes w intensity of exercise
-
exertional spasticity
- spasticity that changes with intensity of exercise
- ex: a runner who was fine for the first few strides, then got spastic (this pt may get 0's on the MAS)
-
rigidity def
- NON-velocity dependent reaction to stretch
- type of hypertonia
-
2 types of rigidity
- cogwheel - successive catches and releases - seen in Parkinsons
- lead pip - stiffness and inflexibility that remains uniform thru the range of passive movement (put a limb somewhere, and it'll stay - seen in elderly and catatonics)
-
flaccidity def
- minimal or absent tone
- minimal or absent muscle contraction ot command or reflexibely
- absent or diminished stretch reflex
-
4 types of flaccidity
- normal
- lower motor neuron (LMN) lesion - motor portion of peripheral n.
- muscle damage
- component of spinal or cortical shock (so this flaccidity is due to CNS damage)
-
diaschisis
- spinal cord or cortical shock
- affected parts will be totally flacid for a while, then spastic, then maybe normal
- unable to prognosticate til shock is resolved
-
triad of symptoms following CNS lesions
aka Upper Motor Neuron syndrome
- 1 - spasticity (spastic paralysis)
- 2 - hyperreflexia (over responsive reflexes - twitching or spastic tendancies)
- 3 - pathological reflexes (clonus and babinski)
-
lower motor neuron syndrome - 3 pathologies
- flaccidity (flaccid paralysis)
- hyporeflexia/arreflexia
- occasional fasciculations - worm-like wiggling of individual muscle fibers -- can hapen w/o lower motor neuron lesion, so it's only indicative if there are other symptoms
-
AROM assessment steps
- assess for normal mvmnt quality, mvmnt to command, strength
- check for symmetry
- repeat w resistance
-
spasticity eval steps
- take joint thru PROM slowly to asses joint for ROM limitations
- then repeat it a few times fast to see if spasticity kicks in
-
deept tendon reflexes aka monosynaptic stretch reflex - how to test?
locate and expose the tendon, put it into a bit of a stretched position, wack the tendon or muscle belly with a hammer at a right angle, causing a quick stretch, see if the muscle responds by contracting
-
Jendrassic maneuver
def and a use
raising the background tone by doing a strenous exercise (ex: press hands together hard)
if a muscle has higher background tone this makes it a bit easier to trigger a deep tendon reflex
-
grading for DTR
0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+
the eval and the response
- 0 eval: absent. response: no visible or palpable contraction
- 1+ eval: hyporeflexia. response: slight contraction
- 2+ eval: normal. response: slight ms contraction w joint mvmnt
- 3+ eval: hyperreflexia. response: brisk contraction w moderate joint mvmnt
- 4+ eval: abnormal hyperreflexia. response: strong contraction. response: strong contraction w 1-3 beats of clonus
- 5+ eval: abnormal hyperreflexia. response: sustained clonus
-
spinal cord levels for biceps, brachioradialis, triceps, quads, achilles
- C5 - biceps
- C6 - brachioradialis
- C7 - triceps
- L3-4 - quads
- S1-2 - achilles
-
babinski (plantar response) reflex
how to elicit it, and the good and bad responses
- draw a blunt prob across sole of foot from heel to ball
- negative response (this is good) - toe flextion and adduction, plantarflextion aka downgoing toes
- positive response (bad unless you're a baby) toe fanning and extension, dorsiflexion, aka upgoing toes
- equivocal response - toes go up and down
- no response - LMN lesion
- triple flexion response - dorsiflexion, knee flexion, hip flexion - severe UMN involvement
-
what does a positive babinski response indicate?
- UNM lesion
- toe fanning + extension, dorsiflexion (upgoing toes)
-
what does no respons in the babinski test indicate?
LMN lesion
-
what response to babinski indicates severe UMN involvement (or a strong tickle reflex)?
triple flexion response: ankle dorsiflex, knee flex, hip flex -- it's a withdrawal reflex
-
clonus
- rhythmic beating of a joint in response to sustained stretch
- most often at ankle joint, but can be anywhere
-
how to test for clonus
quick stretch then hold
-
clonus 4 categories
- normal: 1-1.5 beats
- abnormal: 2-5 beats
- abnormal sustained: > 5 beats
- absent LMN or normal low toned
-
how to get someone out of clonus
remove the stim - so take the person out of stretch by shortening the muscle. Hold there, then slowly return to norm
|
|