-
Resume Fraud
- 3 of the biggest areas of distortion:
- 1. Inflated titles
- 2. Innaccurate dates to cover up job-hopping or unemployment gaps
- 3. half finished degrees, infalted education, or "purchased" degrees
-
to combat resume fraud
- apply a "smell test"
- - put on any discrepancy, employee subject to dismissal
-
Legal issues 5 matters of concern:
- 1. disclaimers
- 2. conducting reference checks
- 3. conducting background checks
- 4. making preemployment inquiries
- 5. making BFOQ claims
-
legal issues 3 areas of rights in disclaimer
- 1. employment at will
- 2. varification consent
- 3. false statement warning
-
Initial Interviews
occurs very early in the intial assessment organizationa nd its staffing system
purpose: is and should be to screen out the most obvious cases of person/job mismatches. focus on assessment of KSAO's
-
Initial Assessment: Reliability
- refers to consistency of measurement. A requirement for validity.
- - unlikely that a valid predictor would have a low reliability
- - reference checks appear to be relatively low
- - Interrater and biographical information - high reliability
- - Initial interview - low level of reliability
-
Initial Assessment: Validity
- Refers to the strength of the relationship between the predictor and job peformance.
- Low: .00-.15
- med: .16-.3
- high: >.3
- most initial assessments have moderate to low
- 2 most valid:
- - biodata
- - experience
-
Initial Assessment: Utility
- refers to the monetary return associated with using the predictor relative to its cost
- Validity - most important consideration
-
Initial Assessment: Applicant Reactions
refers to the favorability of applicants reactions to the predictor
-
Initial Assessment: Adverse Impact
refers to the possibility that a disproportionate number of protected class members may be rejected using this predictor
-
Application Blanks
- applicants background in regards to educational experiences, training, and job experiences
- - can be used to verify the data presented on the resume
- Advantage over Resume: the organization, rather than the applicant, dictates what info is presented
- Disadvantage: to make sure infor requested is critical to job sources
-
GPA in application blanks
most valid in predicting early job performance. Does notplay a large roll.
-
Major in Application Blanks
the more specialized the more important
-
Extracurricular activities in application blanks
depends on the job. sports captain more important than just a player
demonstrates interpersonal skills
-
BIODATA
- reliability and validity is quite positive
- - valid predictor of job performance
- - predicts turnover
-
Substantive Asseessment Methods
- Used to make more precise decisions about applicantsthan the initial assessment
- - who will be high performers
- - personality test
- - ability tests
- - emotional intelligence tests
- - interest, value and preference inventories
- - structured interviews
- - team assessments
-
Discretionary assessment methods:
used to seperate those who receive job offers from the list of finalist
-
Contingent assessment methods
drug testing - body fluids, hair analysis, pupillary reaction test, performance test, integrity tests
medical exams
-
Interest....Inventories
attempt to assess the activities individuals prefer to do both on and off the job. Happier with job employees stay longer
-
Medical exams
used to identify potential health risks in job candidates not particularly valid
-
Personality Tests
- "The Big Five" used to describe behavioral. As opposed to emotional or cognitive.
- capture of to 75% of individuals personality
- 1. extraversion
- 2. agreeableness
- 3. conscientiousness
- 4. emothioanl stability
- 5. openness to experience
(50% inherited)
-
Personality most common measure
- self report surveys
- - administered online
- - > 20 minutes applicants grow impatient
-
Ability tests
measures that assess an individuals capacity to function in a certain way
-
2 major types of ability tests
aptitude
achievement
looks at person innate capacity to function
-
4 major classes of ability tests
1. cognitive (most attention) - measures that assess abilities involved in thinking, memory, reasoning, verbal and math abilities, expression of ideas
- (wonderlic test)
- - most valid
- - generalize across all organization
- - valid for medium complexity (police)
- - valid for high complexity (pilots)
- 2. physical
- 3. sensory/perceptual
- 4. pscyhometer - measure the correlation of though with body movement (flight simulator)
-
Job knowledge tests
attempt to directly assess an applicants ability to comprehend job requirements
-
Situational Judgement tests
place applicants in hypothetical job - related situations where they are asked to choose a course of action from several alternatives
-
Integrity tests
- designed to tap integrity attribute honesty and moral character
- most polygraphs illegal
- 2 major types
- - clear purpose (overt)
- - general purpose (veiled)
-
High vs Low fidelity
high: uses realistic equipment and scenarios to simulate the actual tasks of the job
Low: simulates the task in a written or verbal description and elicits a written or verbal response rather than an actual response
-
Asseessment Centers
a collection of predictors used to forcasts success used for higher level jobs because of the high costs involved
days rather than hours. big part: simulations.
most common - In-Basket exercise
-
Assessment Methods
- In basket - containts memoranda, reports, phone messages and letters that require a response.
- - timed /
- role playing/
- fact finding /
- oral presentation
- Group
-
Adverse impact of predictors
a predictor discriminates between people in terms of the likelihood of their success on the job.
predictor may also discriminate by screening out a disporportionate number of minorities and women
-
compensatory approach to decision making
- scores on one predictor are simply added tos cores on another predictor to yield a total score.
- high score can compensate for a low score
advantage: reconizes that people have multiple talents
-
Multiple hurdles
- an applicant must earn a passing score on each predictor before advancing in the selection process.
- Such an approach is taken when each requirement measure by a predictor is critical to job success
-
Compensatory model four procedures:
- Clinical prediction
- unit weighting
- rrational weighting
- multiple regression
-
compensatory model: clinical prediction
managers use their expert judgement to arrive at a total score
- adv. : it draws on the expertise of managers to weight and combine prediction scores
- dis: managers opinion
-
compensatory model: unit weighting
each predictor is weighted the same at a value of 1.00 scores are added
- adv: simple
- dis: assumes each predictor contributes equally
-
compensatory model: Rational weighting
each predictor receives a differential rather than an equal rating. managers and experts establish the weights.
- WEIGHTS * RAW SCORE
- W * P = total score
-
compensatory model: multiple regression
- predictors receive different weights
- difference: weigbhts are established ont he basis of statistical procedure rather than judgement
|
|