Key Terms Research Methods.txt

A specific statement of prediction that usually states what you expect will happen in your study.

The assurance that no one, including the researchers, will be able to link data to a specific individual.

A specific value of a variable. For instance, the variable sex or gender has two attributes: male and female.

Your abstract idea or theory of what the cause is in a cause-effect relationship you are investigating.

Two dimensional graphs of a group's ideas where ideas that are more similar are located closer together and those judged less similar are more distant. Concept maps are often used by a group to develop a conceptual framework for a research project.

The degree to which conclusions you reach about relationships in your data are reasonable.

An assurance made to study participants that identifying information about them acquired through the study will not be released to anyone outside of the study.

Constructivist are people who hold a philosophical position that maintains that reality is a conceptual construction. In constructivism, the emphasis is placed on understanding how we construe the world. Constructivists may be realists (believe there is an external reality that we imperfectly apprehend and construct our view of) or subjectivists (believe that all constructions are mediated by subjective experience).

Two variables that perform in a synchronized manner.

The belief that there is an external reality independent of a person's thinking (realism) but that we can never know that reality with perfect accuracy (critical).

A study that takes place at a single point in time.

Top-down reasoning that works from the more general to the more specific.

The variable affected by the independent variable; for example, the outcome.

Faulty reasoning that results from making conclusions about individuals based only on analyses of group data.

Your abstract idea or theory of what the outcome is in a cause-effect relationship you are investigating.

Based on direct observations and measurements of reality.

Is the philosophy of knowledge or of how you come to know.

The use of the best available programs or treatments based on careful evaluation using critically reviewed research.

A theory that ideas have survival value and that knowledge evolves through a process of variation, selection, and retention.

A faulty conclusion reached as a result of basing a conclusion on exceptional or unique cases.

The property of a variable that occurs when you include all possible answerable responses.

The incorporation of multiple units of analysis at different levels of a hierarchy within a single analytic model. For instance, in an educational study, you might want to compare student performance with teacher expectations. To examine this relationship would require hierarchical modeling because you are collecting data at both the teacher and student level.

A specific statement of prediction.

A model in which two mutually exclusive hypotheses that together exhaust all possible outcomes are tested, such that if one hypothesis is accepted, the second must therefore be rejected.

The variable that you manipulate. For instance, a program or treatment is typically an independent variable.

Bottom-up reasoning that begins with specific observations and measures and ends up as general conclusion or theory.

A policy of informing study participants about the procedures and risks involved in research that ensures that all participants must give their consent to participate.

A panel of people who review research proposals with respect to ethical implications and decide whether additional actions need to be taken to assure the safety and rights of participants.

A study that takes place over time.

The methods you use to try to understand the world better.

Any research that uses multiple research methods to take advantage of the unique advantages that each method offers. For instance, a study that combines case study interviews with an experimental design can be considered mixed methods.

The property of a variable that ensures that the respondent is not able to assign two attributes simultaneously. For example, gender is a variable with mutually exclusive options if it is impossible for the respondents to simultaneously claim to be both male and female.

A relationship between variables in which high values for one variable are associated with low values on another variable.

The hypothesis that describes the possible outcomes other than the alternative hypothesis. Usually, the null hypothesis predicts there will be no effect of a program or treatment you are studying.

A hypothesis that specifies a direction; for example, when your hypothesis predicts that your program will increase the outcome.

The act of translating a construct into its manifestation—for example, translating the idea of your treatment or program into the actual program, or translating the idea of what you want to measure into the real measure. The result is also referred to as anoperationalization; that is, you might describe your actual program as anoperationalized program.

A relationship between variables in which high values for one variable are associated with high values on another variable, and low values are associated with low values.

The philosophical position that the only meaningful inferences are ones that can be verified through experience or direct measurement. Positivism is often associated with the stereotype of the hardheaded, lab-coat scientist who refuses to believe in something if it can't be seen or measured directly.

The rejection of positivism in favor of a position that one can make reasonable inferences about phenomena based upon theoretical reasoning combined with experience-based evidence.

Data in which the variables are not in a numerical form, but are in the form of text, photographs, sound bytes, and so on.

Data in which the variables are not in a numerical form, but are in the form of text, photographs, sound bytes, and so on.

A variable that is not in numerical form.

The numerical representation of some object. A quantitative variable is any variable that is measured using numbers.

Refers to the correspondence between two variables.

Two or more waves of measurement over time.

RFPs, published by government agencies and some companies, describe some problem that the agency would like researchers to address. Typically, the RFP describes the problem that needs addressing, the contexts in which it operates, the approach the agency would like you to take to investigate the problem, and the amount the agency would be willing to pay for such research.

The central issue being addressed in the study, which is typically phrased in the language of theory.

The ethical issue involved when participants do not receive a service that they would be eligible for if they were not in your study. For example, members of a control group might not receive a drug because they are in a study.

The belief that there is no external reality and that the world as you see it is solely a creation of your own mind.

Pertaining to theory. Social research is theoretical, meaning that much of it is concerned with developing, exploring, or testing the theories or ideas that social researchers have about how the world operates.

An unobserved variable that accounts for a correlation between two variables.

Reasons your conclusion or inference might be wrong.

Many waves of measurement over time.

A hypothesis that does not specify a direction. For example, if your hypothesis is that your program or intervention will have an effect on an outcome, but you are unwilling to specify whether that effect will be positive or negative, you are using a two-tailed hypothesis

The entity that you are analyzing in your analysis; for example, individuals, groups, or social interactions.

The best available approximation of the truth of a given proposition, inference, or conclusion.

Any entity that can take on different values. For instance, age can be considered a variable because age can take on different values for different people at different times.

For ethical reasons, researchers must ensure that study participants are taking part in a study voluntarily and are not coerced.

The design of a study is the specification of how the research question will be answered. A research design should specify how the selection of participants, method of assignment, and choice of measures and time frame work together to accomplish the study objectives.

The approximate truth of inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships.

Pertaining to a cause-effect relationship.

A cause effect relationship. For example, when you evaluate whether your treatment or program causes an outcome to occur, you are examining a causal relationship.

A threat to internal validity that occurs in a study that uses only a single program or treatment group and no comparison or control.

An internal validity threat that occurs in studies that use multiple groups—for instance, a program and a comparison group.

Threats to internal validity that arise because social research is conducted in real-world human contexts where people will react to not only what affects them, but also to what is happening to others around them.

Establishing that the hypothesized cause occurs earlier in time than the effect.

A criterion for establishing a causal relationship that holds that the cause and effect must be related or co-vary.

In a two-variable cause-effect relationship, when the effect can be explained by a third variable other than the cause.

Any other cause that can bring about an effect that is different from your hypothesized or manipulated cause.

A group, comparable to the program group, that did not receive the program.