-
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Federal gov't can create a bank, states cant tax it. Upholds supremacy clause.
-
Marbury v Madison (1803)
Established Judicial Review. Previously, unclear that courts had power to declare laws unconstitiutional.
-
Gibbons v Ogden (1824)
Established commerce clause. Congress can regulate interstate commerce.
-
Dred Scott v Sanford (1857)
- slaves = property
- Didn't have standing in court, could not sue for freedom.
-
Reynolds v US (1878)
- Polygamy.
- Courts respected religious beliefs, but not religious activity thats considered a crime. (9-0)
-
Plessy v Ferguson (1896)
"Separate, but equal" is constitutional. Segregation in trains. Sets up legal segregation.
-
Schenck v US (1919)
Free speech isn't protected when "clear and present danger." Wartime rights (WWI)
-
Gitlow v New York (1925)
Speech is protected, first incorporation case. States must follow freedom of speech.
-
Powell v Alabama (1932)
Blacks accused of rape, sentenced w/o due process. Courts established right to counsel for states. (7-2)
-
Korematsu v US (1941)
Japanese claimed us govt sending them to camps was unconstitutional. President can violate rights during war. (6-3)
-
West Virginia v Barnette (1943)
Students forced to salute flag. Jehovah's witness. Violates students rights (free-excercise), cant force students to salute flag. (8-1)
-
Everson v Board of Education (1847)
Private schools reimbursed parents with taxpayer money. law was constitutional, treated all children equally, and served the general welfare by supporting education, not religion. (5-4)
-
Brown v Board of Education (1854)
Desegregation of schools, segregation in schools unconstitutional.
-
Mapp v Ohio (1961)
Police entered without a warrant. Establishes exclusionary rule.
-
Engel v Vitale (1962)
Unconstitutional to have official school prayer in public schools, due to separation of church and state. (6-1)
-
Baker v Carr (1962)
Malapportionment. Establishes "one person, one vote." Mandtes census every ten years. (6-2)
-
Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
- Not provided an attorney and sent to jail. Required to provide attorney for EVERY case. (9-0)
- Incorporation/ Due Process
-
NYTimes v Sullivan (1964)
Times published defaming story, libel case. Established malice, ruled in favor of Sullivan. (9-0)
-
Escobedo v Illinois (1964)
-
Griswold v Connecticut (1965)
Abortion legal in first trimester. Right to privacy, not in constitution. (1st, 9th and 14th)
-
In re Gault (1966)
Gault arrested without his rights read to him. Underage (minors) have right to due process. (8-1)
-
Miranda v Arizona (1966)
Miranda rights. Arrested for rape and kidnapping, wasn't read his rights. (5-4)
-
Loving v Virginia (1967)
Racial Integrity Act. Court overturned act, interracial mrriages allowed. No race based legal discrimination on marriage. (9-0)
-
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
Buying books teaching evolution in Little Rock, where there was a ban b/c it conflicted with creationism. Court invalidated law, said states can't prohibit teaching evolution in schools. Establishment Clause. (9-0)
-
Brandenburg v Ohio (1969)
"Hate speech is protected" unless it produces action. Must be most likely to produce violence.
-
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
Kids do have freedom of speech unless it disrupts the learning environment.
-
New York Times v United States (1971)
Prior restraint. Can the US Govt restrict NY Times from publishing Pentagon Papers? NY Times has freedom of speech, no prior restraint. (6-3)
-
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
- Made lemon test, deals with religion. Lemon test is a three prong test to check govt involvement in religious activities.
- 1. Secular purpose
- 2. Not to promote/inhibit religion.
- 3. No excessive govt involvement.
-
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Amish children don't need to attend school after 8th grade, due to the free-excercise clause.
-
Miller v California (1973)
- Obsenity not protected unless it passes the SLAPS test.
- Serious Literary, Artistic, Political or Scientific Value.
-
Roe v Wade (1973)
Landmark ruling on abortion. Right to abortion (cultural issues). Based on the precident, Griswold v Connecticut.
-
-
Goss v Lopez (1975)
Do students have due process when suspended? Courts ruled you must have a hearing before suspending student, legally follow due process. (5-4)
-
Buckley v Valeo (1976)
Campaign Finance Laws. Regulates campaigns and spending. Limits individual contributions and self money isn'r restricted. (7-1)
-
Bakke v University of California (1978)
Bakke denied admission based on quota. Courts ruled UC's admission process unconstitutional. (5-4)
-
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier (1983)
School newspapers may be censored. Limits freedom of speech.
|
|