-
Define Release?
Multiple D Issues-
- Releases: A release dn release other tortfeasors unless it
- expressly does so.
-
Define Joint and Several liability
- 1. Joint and Several Liability –Rule: Where multiple acts cause indivisible
- injury, each D will be potentially liable for the entire judgment amt.
- (on exam assume that Joint tortfeasors are J&S liable)
-
Define Contribution and Indemnification. When is it used?
- Contribution and Indemnification – When is this used?: It is used where a D because of
- joint and several liability, has paid more than his fair share of
- the judgment and wants the other Ds to contribute or indemnify.
- ·
- a. Contribution: Rule: where Ds are more or less equally
- responsible, they will share the judgment amt equally.
- Note: 1. D from whom contribution is sought must also be liable (for example, not have independent defense such as intra-family tort immunity)
- 2. Not applicable to intentional torts.
Indemnification: Can get EVERYTHING back from the other Ds.
· Indemnification grounds:
- 1. The other D is a lot more
- responsible (Retailer getting it back from manufacturer)
- 2. Vicarious L- you can get it
- back from the actual tortfeasor
3. SL in product cases. All the way up to manufacturer.
-
What is comparative contribution? How does it work?
Comparative contribution
Rule: Ds will split up judgment according to relative fault (IL Rule) Hypo:
- Adam is 24% responsible for injury. Buster 75%
- responsible. P received $10,000
- judgment. How do we split this up
- bw them? ___________________________. They both owe P $100,000.
- They can go back and get money from each other after P is paid. Tip: Comparative contribution effectively eliminates contribution
- and the first ground for indemnification.
-
Define the Survival and Wrongful Death Statutes.
What are the tort Immunities?
- Survival and wrongful Death: These are derivate
- recoveries. This means you will stand in no better position than decedent would have stood in had he lived.
Tort Immunities
Intra-family- out
Charitable- out
- Governmental- statutory- can’t test this except: Governmental vs. Proprietary function – Rule: Immunity is available
- for governmental functions; it’s
- not available for proprietary functions.
- To determine if function is proprietary, ask: Would a private business
- normally perform this function? If yes, it is a proprietary function.
- Hypo: City parking lot. Governmental or proprietary
- function? It is a Proprietary function.
-
Damages
- There is duty 1. to mitigate 2. Collateral source Rule: Damages not reduced because of payments
- from other sources, e.g., health insurance.
-
Defenses- Contributory Neg, comparative neg, A/R
- 1. Two types contrib. Neg fact patterns: knowing C/N/implied A/R and
- Unknowing Contrib/Neg
- · Knowing Contrib negl/implied assumption of the risk – hypo: Doofus runs across
- street trying to beat negligently driven speeding car. He is struck and
- injured. Will Doofus recover? No.
- Contrib Neg. Was it reasonable care as he crossed the street? No. Tried to beat
- a speeding car. Will Doofus recover? No.
- Implied assumption of risk.
· Two part test for implied Assumption of the risk:
One knew of the risk.
One voluntarily proceeded in the face of it.
- To recognize the fact pattern where both contributory neg and implied
- a/r are available. It is where the plaintiff 1. Unreasonable ; 2. Voluntarily;
- 3. Takes on a known risk.
- · Unknowing Contrib Neg:
- Hypo: Doofus, while
- daydreaming, steps off curb into street and is blindsided by negligently driven
- car. Will Doofus recover? No. Contrib Neg- walking around crossing
- streets daydreaming is not reasonable .
- Watch where you are going. Do not write abour A/R- dn know of the risk
- and dn voluntary take it on.
-
· Knowing Contrib negl/implied assumption of the risk – hypo: Doofus runs across
- street trying to beat negligently driven speeding car. He is struck and
- injured. Will Doofus recover? No.
- Contrib Neg. Was it reasonable care as he crossed the street? No. Tried to beat
- a speeding car. Will Doofus recover? No.
- Implied assumption of risk.
-
· Two part test for implied Assumption of the risk:
-
· Unknowing Contrib Neg:
- Hypo: Doofus, while daydreaming, steps off curb into street and is blindsided by negligently driven
- car. Will Doofus recover? No. Contrib Neg- walking around crossing
- streets daydreaming is not reasonable .
- Watch where you are going. Do not write abour A/R- dn know of the risk
- and dn voluntary take it on.
|
|