-
Sources of law:
Constitutions, statues & ordinances (laws), Case law, administrative agency reg, common law
-
Constitutions
- Federal vs. Stateo
- Always the last word
-
Statues & Ordinances (laws):
-
Statutes = state and federal
- levels (codes)
- Ordinances = county/city
- ordinances
-
Case Law (court decisions):
- “stare decisis” = follow prior
- decisions
-
Administrative Agency Reg:
- Created by legislature (no
- discrimination, disability act)
-
Common Law:
Uniform Law of England
-
Commerical Law
- 1 Contracts/buying and selling goods
- 2 National Conference and
- Commissions
- 3 Uniform Commercial Code
-
National Conference and Commissions
- -States regulate contracts within
- the same state)
- -Created UCC
-
Uniform Commercial Code
- 1 Privately drafted (not federal law)
- 2 Adopted by every state at least in part
- 3 Contract for buying/selling personal property
-
Classifications of Law
- Substantive Law vs. Procedural Law
- Public vs. Private
- Civil vs. Criminal
- Remedies ($) in Law and Equity
-
Substantive Law vs. Procedural Law
- 1 Substantive: law of basic principles of
- contact/rules to follow (ex: tort)
- 2 Procedural: how a law will be
- applied/operated
- Ex: Evidence
- Due Process = process of law
-
Public vs. Private
- Public: Government involvement (criminal prosecution, admin reg)
- Private: Everything else
-
Civil vs. Criminal
- Civil: Person vs. Person
- Criminal: Person vs. State
-
Remedies ($) in Law and Equity
- Remedies: what the person wants (usually money)
- Law: money (damages)
- Equity: the right thing to do/an order for someone to do something (mandatory) - man damus, injunction, repleven (someone took my property i want it back), specific performance, recision
- Equity courts: Divorce and probate courts (moral concept, from law of england)
-
Jurisdiction =
the authority of a court to hear a case
-
Subject Matter (small claims,divorce, bankruptcy, ect.)
what is Due Process:
- Personal service (notice of a lawsuit)
- Long – Arm Statute: business can be sued by
- consumer (jurisdiction over business doing business in a state even if their home office is not in that particular state)
-
Original/Appeals
- Appeals = Reviews
- Original = Starts the lawsuit
-
Personal Property is: “In Rem”, Real Property,Personal Property
- “In Rem” = getting jurisdiction over a property
- Real Property = land and everything attached
- Personal Property = everything else (furniture, t.v.,
-
Venue
- -Has nothing to do with jurisdiction
- -Where lawsuit is heard
- -Geographic location of trial
- -Pretrial publicity (in regards to jury) – would bring
- in jury from another county but within the same state
-
Supreme Courts
- Oldest court
- Constitution court
- Wisconsin= 7 justices
- U.S. = 9 justices
- Limited original jurisdictions – usually appeals
-
State Court System
General Trial Courts
- -Where a lawsuit is started
- -Circuit courts
-
State Court System
Appellate Courts
- -Review only, no witnesses
- -Error of law in trial?
- -Cannot file lawsuit
-
Federal Court System
-Jurisdiction
-Federal Question
-Diverse Citizenship
(is a federal question) ???
- -Citizens of two separate states
- -Need to guarantee the out of state citizen a fair trial
- -Moved to federal court if damages exceed $75,000 AND
- the individual requests the case to be moved
-
Concurrent?
- -At the same time
- -One act violates two jurisdictions – Federal and State
-
U.S. Supreme Court?
- -9 justices appointed for life
- -President appoints
- -Limited U.S. jurisdiction (appeals)
-
District Courts
- Trial Courts
- Federal lawsuit starts here (most)
-
Judicial Procedure (Civil Lawsuits)
Summons and Complaints=
- -Don’t need an attorney, but most have one
- -Summon = a notice that there is a lawsuit and you are required to respond within “x” amount of days
- -Et al = “and others”
- Complaint has to identify theparties
-
Severe Summons and Complaints
(Pleadings):
- -Filed
- -Judge randomly assigned – can
- request one change
- -“Personal service”
-
Defendant’s Response (Pleadings):
Large claims how long to resond
20 days
-
How long to respond to small claims
don’t need to respond but you must show up
-
Defendant’s Response (Pleadings)
Responses:
- Motion to dismiss (ex: wrong person), attacks complaint
- Answer = admit or deny claim
- Counterclaim = burden of proof on the defendant
- Cross Complaint = 3rd party files a complaint, bring in 3rd party
-
Judicial Procedure (Civil Lawsuits)
Pretrial Hearing
- -Occurs with judge and attorneys
- -Try to settle (What’s going on in case)
- -Scheduling order = Setting a
- deadline for naming witnesses and talking to witnesses
-
Judicial Procedure (Civil Lawsuits)
Motions
- -Motion to dismiss = temporarily dismisses case
- -Summary judgment motion = both sides have reached an
- agreement – no facts, just a matter of law
-
Judicial Procedure (civil)
Discovery:
- Fact finding
- Depositions:
- -Sword testimonies, admissible at time of trial
- -Watch to see if person changes story
- -Done before trial at lawyer’s
- office
- -Preserve evidence, likely to settle because facts are presented
-
Discovery
Interrogatories:
- -questions sent to other side, less expensive
- -sent back and forth
-
Discovery
Demand to Produce Documents:
Subpoena Duces Tecum =
order to show up and bring “x” documents
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Trial
- -Judge decides unless a party requests a jury
- -If there will be a jury, the first step is to select the jurors (eliminating people)
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Voir Deir
- asking questions to jury
- start with 18 and each side gets rid of 3 each
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Trial
Opening Statement:
- -Have this if you have a jury
- -Outlines the case
- -Both sides give, but defendant usually waits to hear the plaintiff’s case
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Trial
Plaintiff’s Case: Evidence (what do they bring)
- -Witnesses
- Regular = 1st hand info
- Experts = can give opinion
- -Documents
- Other exhibits: pictures,
- drawings
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Direct examination (whoever is calling) =
no leading questions (what did you see, what did youhear, what happened then)
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Cross examination (witnesses against you) =
leading questions (isnt it true that, suggesting the answer) - yes,no, i dont know, i dont remember
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Motion for a Directed Verdict:
- -Usually done by defendant
- -Asking judge to direct the verdict in their favor
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Defendant’s Case:
- -Usually when defendant gives opening statement (gives counterclaim also at this point)
- -The rest is the same as plaintiff’s case
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Closing Arguments:
- -Not evidence
- -Reviewing the trial – witnesses
- -Plaintiff, defendant, plaintiff
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Decision:
- -Verdict done by jury (if jury)
- -Judge gives instructions to jurors
- -Judge can throw out jury verdict and request a new jury
- -Judge can enter a judgment against jury verdict
- -Judge can raise or lower money amount
-
Judicial Procedure (civil lawsuit)
Appeal:
Judge cannot prohibit an appeal
-
TORTS:
- Act or omission that causes injury to
- another.
-
TORTS:
Kinds of Torts
- Intentional Torts (usually crimes)
- Intentional torts against property
- Business Tort
- Negligence (Carelessness)
- Strict Liability
-
Intentional Torts (usually crimes)
Intentional torts against a person:
- Battery
- Assault
- Fraud
- Defamation of Character
- Slander
- Libel
- Common defense
-
Battery
unwanted touching
-
Assault
subjective/hard to have assault without battery
-
Fraud
- = intentional misrepresentation of face
- reasonably relied upon by another person (commonly on contracts)
-
Defamation of Character =
- Slander = Oral/Public
- Libel = Written
- Common defense = “Truth”
-
Disparagement =
- making an untrue statement about a product
- (false advertisement)
-
Intentional torts against property? Which are?
- Trespass to land
- Trespass to personal property
- Conversion
- Nuisance
-
Trespass to land
occurs when there is “no trespassing” sign
-
Trespass to personal property
not theft, but taking something of someone’s
-
Conversion
- -personal property
- -In WI, landlords cannot hold
- personal property from tenants
-
Nuisance:
- -Owner of real property
- -Zoning: Can’t run a business
- out of your house if living in residential area
- -Attractive nuisance
- EX: pool in backyard needs to
- be protected with a fence
-
Business Tort. What does it consist of?
- -Copyright or trademark infringement
- -“I own this”
- -Music, poetry, stories, computers, ect.
- -Interference with contractual relationships
-
Interference with contractual relationships
- -Causing someone to break acontract
- -Max time an employor can keep you from taking customers = 2 year
- -Ex: New employer forcing new
- employee to use customer from old company
-
Negligence (Carelessness)
- -Failure to exercise reasonable care (care exercised by a reasonable person)
- -No negligence under age 7
-
Joint and Several Liability
(Leases)
-
Contributory Negligence (Affirmative) =
- -negligence on the part of the injured person (usually the plaintiff)
- - could also be defendant on counterclaim
-
Comparative Negligence =
- -Comparing responsibility
- -Plaintiff’s award (or defendant on counterclaim) is reduced by the plaintiff’s percent of negligence
- -To win anything, the plaintiff’s (defendant’s on counterclaim) percent must be equal to or less than the defendant’s
- -As soon as the injured person is more responsible for his or her injkury than any other one individual (you cant recover if you are more liable for your own injuries)
-
Strict Liability. what is that?
- -automatic liability (control of dangerous instrumentality)
- -contributory negligence is not possible.
- -Negligence does not apply (need a common dangerous factor)
- -Injured person cannot be negligent
- -High explosives
- -Wild animals
- -Product liability
-
Ethical Reasoning
- Duty
- Outcome
- Corporate Social Responsibility
-
Duty
- Religious
- Kantian (human nature)
- Right/Duty
-
Corporate Social Responsibility
- -Shareholders = investing money with expectation of making profits
- -Employees = medical insurance,401K
- -Society
-
Sarbanes-Oxley
Reporting an employee (has to do with financial outcome of company, public view of accounting).
-
Excessive Executive Pay
- -Board of Directors (determine CEO’s salary)
- -Stock options
- -Misleading regulators (reporting issues in quarterly reporting, ect.)
-
Employment Practices
-Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA)
- Bribes/Accounting
- $2 million
- $100,000/5 years in prison
-
-
Legally enforceable agreement
-
Types of Contracts
- Express vs. Implied:
- Quasi-Contracts:
- Bilateral vs. Unilateral:
- Formal vs. Informal:
- Executed vs. Executory
- Valid, Void, Voidable, & Unenforceable
- Standardized Contracts:
-
Express vs. Implied:
- Express: giving terms of agreement (can be oral or written)-price, specifications, delivery
- Implied (in fact): agreed services to be performed, but implied a reasonable price. (
-
Quasi-Contracts:
- -Implied in law contract
- -Not a real contract
- -Equitable remedy
- Ex: A white picket fence was installed at the wrong house. However, when the company went to remove
- the picket fence, the house wanted to keep it. Therefore, the law requires the couple to pay a reasonable price in order to keep the fence.
-
Bilateral vs. Unilateral:
- Bilateral: 2 promises (promise for promise)
- Unilateral: promise in exchange for action
-
Formal vs. Informal:
- Formal: simple, promising note (seal, SS under signature)
- Informal: everything else
-
Executed vs. Executory
- Executed: full performance by both parties
- Executory: one or both need to perform an action
-
Valid, Void, Voidable, & Unenforceable
- Valid: If a contract consists of all components (Agreement, consideration, competent parties, and legality)
- Void: One of the elements is missing therefore not a valid contract
- Unenforceable: Void contract because missing
- the element of legality
-
Standardized Contracts:
- Ex: Car contract
- Contract for real estate
-
Elements – Offer:
- Intention (objective theory):what most people would have thought based on comments and statements EX; what happens if you look for used car and you go on ebay and you see a intersting car. Are you going to pay the price? No because advertisements are invitations to negotiate (intent to make an offer)-most important
- Definiteness: subject matter, parties (enough terms to indicate an offer)
- Communication: offers are affected when received
-
Termination of the Offer:
- Sale to third party does not automatically revoke offer
- By operation of law:
- -Lapse of time (if not stated in offer, by a reasonable time) EX automatically ends in 15 days
- -Destruction of the subject matter
- -Death or incompetence of either party
- By action of the partiesRevocation(not a rejection but taking back,effective upon recieved):
- -Made by person who made offer(anytime before acceptance)
- -Option Contracts: cannot be revoked (money has been paid to keep offer open)
- -UCC (Uniform Commercial Code): only professional
- merchants/not applying to services or real estate
- -Rejection
- -Counter offer – conditions on yes, but.
-
Firm Offers:
- -Merchants cannot revoke a firm offer
- -Personal property (tangible)– not real estate
- -By a merchant
- -Must be written and signed by
- merchant (specific time not exceeding 90 days)
-
Agreement: Acceptance
General
- Mailbox rule: offers are accepted when sent
- Unequivocal: Yes or no? Clear language, no conditions
- Silence as Acceptance: Silence is not acceptance unless parties have a pre-arrangement.
-
When does an acceptance become
effective?
- If no special means of communication is not specified
- Exceptions:
- -Not used by offeree
- -Otherwise, effective upon receipt if specified in offer
- -Where there is a rejection followed by an acceptance
-
Consideration
- -Something of value
- -SUBJECTIVE – this is what the parties decide
- -Bargain for exchange
-
Consideration
Requirements?
-Must be legally sufficient (individuals are promising/doing something that they are not legally obligated to do or refraining from something).
-
Forbearance:
giving up a right – common way disputes are settled
-
Adequacy of Consideration:
- -Quantity – how much
- -Subjective
- -Ex: If you name your child after me I will give you $5,000. But if you already named your child after me before I asked, I do not owe you $5,000.
- -$1.00 – transferring of land for development
-
When is Consideration Not Present?
-
-Past Consideration – no bargain for exchange (you have already done it)
- -Performing a pre-existing duty (Ex: a cop can’t collect rewards for finding a criminal)
- -Employee states that they want more money for performing the exact same duties.
-
Promises Enforceable Without Consideration
Promissory Estoppel: ?
- When a person making the promise can reasonably expect the other person to rely on it and the only way to avoid injustice is to enforce the contract.
- -cant revoke your promise
-
Promises Enforceable Without
Consideration
Quasi Contract: ?
mplied in law
-
Promises Enforceable Without Consideration
Charitable Subscriptions:
- -Promising to give a gift
- -Not enforceable (usually no consideration)
|
|