-
Affiriming the consequent
- An invalid argument form:
- If p,then q.
- Q
- Therefore, p.
-
Antecedent
Thefirst part of a conditional statement (If p, then q.), the component that begins with the word if.
-
Cogent argument
A strong inductive argument with all true premises.
-
Conditional statement
An “if-then” statement; it consist of the antecedent(the part introduced by the word if) and the consequent(the part introduced by the word then).
-
Consequent
The part of a conditional statement (if p, then q.) introduced by the word then.
-
Deductive argument
Intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusions.
-
Denying the antecedent
- An individual argument form:
- If p, then q.
- Not p.
- Therefore, q.
-
Dependent premise
A premises that’s depends on at least one other premises to provide joint support to a conclusion. If a dependent premise is removed, the support that its linked dependent premise supply to the conclusion is undermined or completely canceled out.
-
Disjunctive syllogism
A valid argument form:
- Either p or q.
- Not p.
- Therefore,q.
-
Hypothetical syllogism
- A valid argument made up of three
- hypothetical or conditional statements:
- If p, then q.
- If q, then r.
- Therefore,if p, then r.
-
Independent premise
A premise that does not depend on other premises to provide support to a conclusion. If an independent premise is removed, the support that other premises supply to the conclusion is not affected.
-
Inductive argument
An argument in which the premises are intended to provide probable, not conclusive, support for its conclusions.[form]
-
Modus Ponens (affirming the antecedent)
- valid argument form.
- If p, then q.
- P.
- Therefore, q
|
|