-
lay witness
may only testify to matters which he has personal knowledge of
-
Non hearsay
prior sworn statements
prior consistent statements
prior out of court identification by witness at trial
admissions by party
adoptive admissions
vicarious admissions
-
specific acts
may be admitted to show character if character is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense
-
offer to settle (& any statements/conduct accompanying)
not admissible to prove liability or amount of claim if disputed as to liability or amount
-
criminal case exceptions for admitting evidence of prior sexual conduct
to prove specific instances of sexual behavior by the alleged victim, if offered to prove that a person other than the accussed was source of physical evidence
to prove specific instances of sexual behavior by alleged victim with person accussed; if offered by accussed to prove consent or by prosecution
if exclusion of evidence would violate def's const. rights
-
relevant evidence
evidence tending to make the existence of any fact more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence
-
spousal testimony privilege
right of either spouse in criminal cases to prohibit testimony by the other
- ***all communications before & during
- divorce destroys
-
habit evidence
of a person, or routine practice of an org is admissible to show conduct on particular occassion was in conformity with
-
parol evidence rule
once the parties have reduced their agreement to a writing, evidence of any prior oral or written or contemporaneous oral agreements is inadmissible to alter, vary, or contradict the writing
-
doctrine of completeness (FRE 106)
when one party introduces part of a writing, the other party may introduce any other admissible part of the document (does not trump the hearsay rule)
-
prior inconsistent statements
admissible substantively in 3 cases:
- 1. if sworn under FRE 801(D)(1)
- 2. as an admission
- 3. if hearsay exception applies
-
federal court privileges
- atty-client
- spousal (testimony privilege & confidential communication privilege)
- clergy
- psychotherapist-patient
-
admissibility of felony convictions
may admit (recent convictions)-if impeaching party 1st shows probative value outweighs prejudicial effect
must-unless objecting party shows prejudicial effect of impeachment substantively outweighs the probative value of evidence
-
admissible convictions (dishonesty/false statement)
(must admit) convictions of dishonesty or false statements against any witness, as long as the conviction is within 10 yrs, so long as the conviction satisfies 403 balancing test
(may) if older than 10 yrs, only if its determined probative value outweighs prejudicial effect
-
offer/promise to pay medical expenses
not admissible to prove liability for injury
BUT admissions made in connection w/can be severed & admitted
-
defencse of insanity burdens
burden of production: def must 1st present "some evidence" of insanity @ time of the offense
- burden of persuasion:
- fed crts: def must prove insanity by clear & convincing
- State crts: split
- def must prove insanity by preponderance (MPC) or
- prosecution must prove sanity beyond reasonable doubt
-
evidence of prior conduct (sexual misconduct case)
(civil or criminal) evidence generally inadmissible to show that an alleged victim engaged in other sexual behavior or any alleged victim's sexual predisposition
-
spousal communications privilege
protects confidential communications made during a legally valid marriage
- applies only during marriage
- divorce does not effect (civil & criminal)
-
character evidence general rule
evidence of a person's character is inadmissible to prove that they acted in conformity with that character
-
MIMIC evidence
in a criminal case, prosecution may introduce circumstantial evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts for very narrow purpose of proving:
- motive
- opportunity
- intent
- preparation
- plan
- knowledge
- identity
- absence of mistake
- accident
-
subsequent remedial measures
inadmissible to prove: negligence, culpable conduct, defect in a product, defect in product's design, or a need for warning or instruction
admissible to show: ownership, control, feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment
-
Hearsay exceptions
party-party admission
declarant unavailable: former testimony, forfeiture by wrong doing, statement against interest, dying declaration
declarant is ANYONE: excited utterance, present sense impression, state of then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition, statement for purpose of medical treatment or diagnosis, business & public records
|
|