-
Autumn Rhythm, Jackson Pollock 1950
- Too large to take in all at once, almost literally
- unfolds as you gaze across it
- Shows relinquishing of SOME control, in that gravity and
- physics takes power of where EXACTLY paint lands on canvas instead of brush
- Innovation of Abstract Expressionist, non-compositional;
- no moment in the canvas is more or less important than any other; “any-other-ness”
- It is COMPLETELY abstract, as in other are no figures
- buried beneath paint
- Autonomy of art- Canvas/art is outside social life,
- outside everyday life---autonomy can perhaps be achieved through
- anti-illusionism/opticality
-Mural sized (important quality for Pollock)
-all-over-ness, element of repetition as well
-non compositional
- -non hierarchical (all three of these mean no part of
- canvas is any more important than another)
- -paintbrush is divorced from canvas (brush does not
- touch canvas)
- -OPTICALITY- only eyes can traverse, not a space for our
- bodies, no clear content or subject matter, lines do not provide contour of
- anything
- -an anti-drawing, painting about painting (purely
- Greenberg)
-skene (?)
- -GOOD EXAMPLE OF MODERNIST AUTONOMY- paintings about
- painting, do not reference anything else, no real-world reference,
- -this withdrawal was important in the US for many
- reasons, one of them being the restrictive art forms being forced on artists in
- Europe during this time period
-
Free Wheeler, Cy Twombly 1955
- Canvas seems destroyed, defaced; Presents different
- relationship from Pollock (“I am here” becomes “I was here”). Seems graffitied
Abstract Expressionist
-
4'33", John Cage 1951
- Actual performance was the moments before music is
- usually played (walking to piano, putting up sheet music, pulling out bench)
- and sitting silently, hoping to hear the silence, which he realized does not
- exist. We hear ambient noises, but
- dismiss them so quickly that we do not remember them.
Was an idea emulated in other abstract expressionists pieces, including White Painting (3 Panels) by Rauschenberg
-
White Painting (Three Panels), Robert Rauschenberg 1951
- Cage describes this as NOT an absence of art, or a
- negation. This is a presencing, the making visible
- of things now perceived that are normally dismissed. Rather than paintings being empty, they are filled with
- passing shadows, dust that collectss
-response to abstract expressionism
-formally have the same all-over-ness
- -during this time, there is a concerted effort from
- trained artists such as Rauschenberg, to de-skill themselves, to render
- the artists language as something that is not lofty or specialized, a
- democratization of the art-making practice perhaps
-What makes something art? Answer becomes the concept, not skill (BIG shift in art)
- -NOT empty, has shadows, dust, opened up work to its
- environment, to the effects of time
- -rejects modernism, dependant on its environment on the
- people who pass in front of it, “landing strip” for lights and shadows and all
- other ephemeral things
Post modern REJECTION of abstract expressionism
-
Factum I and II, Robert Rauschenberg 1957
- Worked on these simultanously, are never separated from each other (shared by MOCA
- and MOMA). One is NOT a copy of
- the other; are a critique of expressionist gesture; captures language of
- Rauschenberg, however does not attempt to capture spontaneous or unconscious
- nature as Pollock did. Betrays expressionist claims to authenticity and
- originality
- Flatbed picture plane- internal psychic shift; works of
- art are not oriented to us on the vertical, on the optical that de koonings and pollocks are, they are not
- oriented to our vision, but instead to our space of working; works like these
- do not mke sense to Greenbergian sense; Steinberg
- believed works like these let the world in again; canvas is not about the
- artists internal turmoil, nor this pure opticality- they are about YOUR lives, all these things ou would find on your
- own desk
- Art object ceases to
- make claims to transcendence, to revelation, instead is about the lives that
- you lead as the viewers, and is about the everyday world; remarkable shift that
- happens in 1950’s as response to abstract expressionism and paintings like “Autumn
- Rhythm” (REJECTION OF MODERNIST AUTONOMY)
-
Flag, Jasper Johns 1954-55
Encaustic, oil and collage on fabric mounted on plywood
mummifies gestures in surface
Ready-made design
Recalls all-overness of abstract expressionism
-
Challenging Mud, Kazuo Shiraga 1955
Gutai (Gutai Group)= tangible, or concrete
- Interesting translation of certain qualities of abstract
- expressionism into completely different environment, can be construed as
- creative misreading; exact opposite of opticality (completely figurative, yet shows that clash of artist and art, that confrontation)
-
Bed, Rauschenberg 1955
Horizontality of bed relates to "making" as Renaissance verticality of painting related to "seeing", so says Steinberg
-
Drowning Girl, Roy Lichtenstein 1963
-made sketch, then project it onto the canvas
- -ben day dots stenciled
- on
- -very clear mix of the high and low (brow), and shades
- of grey with regards to authorship (we know the author of the original comic
- strip);
-"handmade ready-made"
-
Little Big Painting, Roy Lichtenstein 1965
Pop artists are also engaging in the __ of the absract expressionists
- -rendering calls up an abstract expressionist brush
- stroke, but involves skill (sketch, projection onto canvas)
- -suggests artist’s hand, attest to spontaneity, but are
- completely contrived (not painted with spontaneity at all)
- -still have reference to popular culture with Ben Day
- dots
-
Campbell's Soup Cans, Andy Warhol 1962
- -no evidence that he cared what order they were put in,
- 32 flavors at the time had come out
- -He ate only this soup for a year, so can be considered
- a self-portrait
- -originally shown on shelves, mimicking their
- positioning in a supermarket
- -looks repetitive, but there are little differences
- largely as a result of the screenprinting process itself (but like the soup itself, ever can we
- buy has a small difference to the flavor, or specific volume to the last drop)
-what we consume defines us (what flavor do we prefer)
-
Marilyn Diptych, Andy Warhol 1962
- -handmade qualitiy in that they are SO different (some crystal clear, some
- completely defaced)
- -these images stop us, do not grant us access to
- Marilyn, to her persona, to her life; not about Marilyn the person, about the
- production of these images, how people become readymade objects to be
- reproduced just as a campbells soup can ad infinitem
-
The Week That Was, Andy Warhol 1963
- Image of Jackie Kennedy before and after JFK
- assassination, some RIGHT after he was shot
- -through jackie and her kids, we mourned the president, she became a
- SYMBOL of the mourning
- -these photos from Life magazine (two issues), seem to
- represent her authentic experience of her trauma and the mourning, the photos
- give us jackie
- -does warhol give us jackie? We don’t
- get full access to the narrative (images out of chronological order), flips
- image so we don’t know which is the real image, bleaches and blues some images
- (detaches them from reality, uses color for formal reasons)
- *crops photos so we don’t see the photos in the
- environment she is in
- -photographs do not get us to the true moment, Life does
- not get us there, is also just a representation
-
Thirteen Most Wanted Men, Andy Warhol 1964
-commissioned for the world’s fair
- -uses mug shots of most wanted men in NY, taken the text
- off so we don’t know who they are or their crimes, enlarged them and put them
- in a position of celebration or power, we just see the appeal of the shots
- -splits up the mugshots (frontal and profile views) so that they face each
- other, manipulating the codes of the mug shot
- -NOT CURRENT mug shots, were no longer felons at large
- being persued
- -if the police don’t want them, who does? Warhol most likely, known gay men; or
- perhaps they want each other, or perhaps WE want them
- -through the title, they become associated with the
- status of the deviant; Robert Moses (organizer of the fair) didn’t want it up,
- left it up to Warhol to cover it up, who painted it silver so that the figures
- still haunts the surface from beneath
- -act of man
- (police) wanting another man (criminal) is ITSELF a criminal act
- -worlds fair is arena
- where we are supposed to celebrate the bright future of the country, warhol is stirring up the past,and representing people
- that do not celebrate this
-
Youth Portrait: October 18, 1977, Gerhard Richter 1988
|
|