-
10th amendment case group?
- 1-Garcia........ overturns National League; must be generally applicable
- 2- NY----------- can't commandeer state leg.
- 3-Printz--------can't compel state enforcement
- 4- Reno-------- must be generally applicable and not commander state legislature, enforcement, or regulate citizens
-
Garcia
- JUSTICE BLACKMUN (swing voteà was in majority of National League… now in
- the majority for Garcia)
- Overturns National League (b/c “traditional
- and nontraditional government function is an unworkable distinction); Congress
- cannot impose laws that are not GENERALLY APPLICABLE LAW because otherwise
- would infringe on the 10th amendment—must apply to private individuals
- and states in the same manner; not target states;
Facts: Operation of mass transit= traditional state function; was argued by San Antinio Met. that FLSA not apply b/c of National League
-
New York
- Under the 10th
- amendment, Congress may not COMMANDEER the state legislative process by
- compelling states to enact or enforce a federal law/regulatory program or force states to take title because it violates state sovereignty
- (a) States must retain the ultimate decision as
- to whether or no to comply
(b) Can’t force state to take title or pass legislation
- (1) Facts: New York sought declaration that the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act was unconstitutional. 1985 Act set
- deadlines for every state to join a regional waste compact, developing-state
- disposal, or find another way to dispose of its own waste.
-
PRINTZ
- Federal government COMMANDER the state law enforcement to enforce or administer a federal regulatory program against its
- citizens because it violates separation of powers by removing Presidential
- oversight;
- Facts: Two chief law enforcement officers (CLEO) filed
- actions challenging the constitutionality provisions of the Brady Act, which
- required that they perform background checks on prospective gun purchasers.
-
RENO
- Congress may regulate state activities when
- the statute is a generally applicable law (Garcia) and does not require the state to (1) regulate its own citizens, (NY and Printz) (2) to enact law/regulations (NEW
- YORK), or (3) enforce a federal
- regulatory provision (PRINTZ);
- outside the scope of the 10th amendment.
Driver Info is an instrumentality of interstate commerce;
- Facts: SC brought suit against US, arguing Driver’s
- Privacy Protection Act, which prevented disclosure of private information contained in DMV records.
-
TAXING AND SPENDING CASE GROUP
- 1- Butler ----- Tax/spend power broad (Hamilton view)
- 2- Steward Machine Co. ------ privileges/rights same
- 3- Sabri ------------ Necessary and Proper Clause
- 4- Dole ----------- Congressional limits for conditional funds
- Pennhurst ----- Bill of Rights= ambiguous
-
Butler
- Congress has broad (Hamilton view) authority to tax and spend for the general
- welfare so long as it does not violate other constitutional provisions.
-
Steward Machine Co.
- No distinction between privileges and natural
- rights when it comes to tax. Natural rights (vocations) are subject to uniform taxation
- Facts: Under the Social Security Act, Congress required employers with 8 or more employees to pay a payroll tax. Tax was laid with
- uniformity throughout US as a duty upon a relation of employment.
-
Sabri
- Congress has the power under the taxing and
- spending clause in conjunction with the necessary and proper clause to ensure proper use and integrity of fed. Funds.
(a) Ensure spending is appropriate.
- Facts: Sabri, a developer, offered bribes to a city
- councilman to ease his real estate building plans. He was convicted for violating the federal anti-bribery
- statute, which he challenges as being unconstitutional. Bribed the councilman on three separate
- occasions.
-
Dole
- 4 Limitations on Congress for valid
- condition funds:
(a) Spending pursuant to the general welfare (great latitude here)
(b) Condition must be unambiguous (Pennhurst)
(c) Condition relates to a federal interest—
- (d) Condition does not violate other
- constitutional provisions
Condition is not coercion or compulsory under the 10th amendment. A mild ENCOURAGEMENT!
Facts: Congress passed a law withholding 5% of federal highway funds to states with a drinking age of less than 21 years.
-
CASE GROUPING FOR 13, 14, 15 AMENDMENT
- 13TH AMENDMENT
- - Runyon---------- (K--> private schools)
- - Jones ------------ (Real property --> sell to blacks)
- 14th AMENDMENT
- -Morrison--------> reaffirmed Civil Rights Case that 14th apply only to states
- - Morgan---------> Apply Necessary and Proper to prohibit literacy test although not unconstitutional;
- - Flores -----------> Must be history of discrimination and remedy is congruent and proportional to targeted violation.
- 15TH AMENDMENT
- -Holder----------> Avoidance Doctrine
-
HOLDER
15TH AMENDMENT
- Court applies avoidance principle to avoid
- constitutional issue and instead does a statutory analysis. All political
- subdivisions are eligible to file a bailout suit.
-
Flores
14th amendment
- Enactment under §5 of the 14th amendments, requires
- a history of discrimination by the states (which violates equal protection based on gender/race) and the remedy imposed by Congress must be congruent and proportional to the
- targeted violation; thus the means achieve the ends.
- (i) Congress can only ENFORCE the 14th amendment pursuant to §5 but cannot
- REINTERPRET or CREATE constitutional rights. GENERALLY APPLICABLE laws are
- exceed enforcement powers ->
- Religious Freedom Act :(
- (a)
- Facts: After the city of Boerne denied Archbishop
- Flores a building permit to expand a church, under a “generally applicable law”
- he contended that the permit denial violated the Religious Freedom Restoration
- Act. The RFRA prohibited the government from substantially burdening a person's
- exercise of religion even if the burden is the result of a generally applicable
- law, unless the government has a compelling interest and is using the least
- restrictive means.
-
Morgan
14TH AMENDMENT (BRENNAN)
- EXAM: In Morgan, the court likened §5 of the 14th amendment to the Necessary and Proper Clause!!!! Congress can prohibit behavior that
- could lead to discrimination.
- Congress can regulate state conduct that
- violates 14th amendment. Est. the test for Congressional enactment
- under §5 of the 14th amendment: (1) plainly adapted to end historical violations of rights and (2) consistent with the letter and spirit
- of the constitution.
- Facts: NY required English literacy as a prerequisite
- to voting. US Attorney General alleged that 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of
- 1965 can only be sustained if Court determines NY’s requirement violates the
- Equal Protection Clause of 14th amendment.
-
Morrison
14TH AMENDMENT; REHNQUIST
- 14th amendment prohibits only
- state action. Reaffirmed Civil rights acts.
- (a)
- Facts: Morrison was accused of sexually assaulting a
- freshman student at the Virginia Polytechnic University and the victim sued
- Morrison for civil damages under the Violence against women Act.
-
Jones
13th amendment
13th amendment applies to REAL PROPERTY
- (a) §
- 1982 applies to prohibit private discrimination and that Congress had the
- authority under 13th amendment to adopt the law; "Congress has the power under the 13th amendment to determine what
- ARE THE BADGES AND INCIDENTS OF SLAVERY and the authority to translate that
- determined into effective legislation. Here…. Real property
-
Runyon
13th amendment;
- 13TH amendment applies CONTRACTING; Private schools cannot solely exclude based on
- race
(a) No basis to distinguish from Jones; 13th amendment reaches private conduct J
- (b) Issue: Whether § 1981 prohibits private schools from excluding qualified African-American
- children solely because of their race
|
|