-
Free rider/Collective action problem
There are certain things that are good for us but we do not pay the cost knowing that we still reap the benefit
-
Collective goods
- Things that we all want and benefit from but difficult to produce
- Special feature: once they are produced, people cannot be excluded from consuming
-
Capitalism
System where the means of production are privately owned
-
Socialism
- Government owns the means of production
- People work for the government
-
Principle-agent problem
- Something you are constantly embedded in yourself
- Principle = citizen: Person who has the responsibility
- Agent = representative: Delegate and "Employees" --> Have frequent election
- Solution: Elections
-
Democracy
- Governmental participation is widely shared
- Requirements: (1) Popular sovereignty: rule of the people, (2) Political equality: one person, one vote, (3) Liberty: freesom from government intervention and actions
-
Autocracy
- Only one person makes the decisions
- Dictators
-
2010 Health Care Reform (main features)
- Insurance companies barred from dropping people from coverage when they get sick
- Young adults able to stay on their parents' health plans until age 26
- Insurance companies cannot deny coverage to children under age 19, due to a pre-existing condition
- Most people required to obtain health insurance coverage or pay a tax if they don't (2014)
- Health plans no longer can exclude people from coverage due to pre-existing conditions. (2014)
- State health insurance exchanges for small businesses and individuals open (2014)
-
Popular sovereignty
Rule of the people
-
Political equality
One person, One vote
-
Deliberative will
Government shouldn't respond to every whim but once the public has had a sufficient amount of time to debate and reflect on the issue
-
Articles of Confederation
- First attempt at creating government
- New systems because of weaknesses from the old system
- No one authority that controls all of them
- Weak in terms of:
- (1) Taxes: no system; had to ask states for money
- (2) War: could not declare war; no taxation affects war
- (3) Money: different money in different states; holding back economic growth
- (4) Treaties: every state can do what they want; could be signed with states and coutries
- (5) Interstate commerce: for economic developement -> rules; high tax between states; tarrifs
- (6) Getting things done: Each state got one vote; Needed 9/13 votes to agree
-
Virginia Plan
- Written by James Madison
- Separation of powers: Dividing governmental authority; Branches of government with different roles
- Bi-cameral legislature: 2 house legislature; Each under the plan subject to population-based representation
- Population-based representation: More people in state, more representation
- Strong national government: Pass laws on everything; Harmony of the United States
-
New Jersey Plan
- Separation of powers
- Uni-cameral legislature: Keep one legislative body; One vote per state
- State-based representation
- Limited national government: Should create national currency, borrow money, create army
-
Great Compromise
- (1) Ambiguous wording: Easier for agreement on vague rather than specific; Questioned of concrete authority
- (2) Republic - not direct democracy: Democracy to Founding Fathers: representative; vote on who represents you in House of Representatives and Senate
- (3) Separation of powers (and checks and balances)
- (4) Compromises
- (5) Federalism
- (6) Bill of Rights
-
3/5 Compromise
Count slaves as 3/5 of a person for representation
-
Necessary and proper clause
- Give national Government authority
- Lists responsibilities of government
-
Interstate commerce clause
- For economic development: rules
- High tax between states
- Tariffs
-
Electoral College
- How to select the president: Each state given a number of votes; More population, more votes; Every state gets 2 seats; 538 votes - Need 239 to become president
- Consequences: Small states have more influence; Winner does not have to have the most votes; Influences turnout
-
Federalists
Wanted strong national government
-
Anti-Federalists
Weak national government
-
Federalist #10
- Solves the problem of factions: People inherently form groups around common interest; Also pursue their own interest; Once factions come together they will pursue policies that benefit them instead of the whole; Madison concerned poor people will vote to tax the wealthy
- Masses are not to be trusted to decide what is best for the whole
-
Federalist #51
- How can you get government to control the people and also itself?
- Protect against majority
- Separation of powers
- If men were perfect beings, there would be no government. - Hobbes
- Divide government to authority
-
Constitutional amendments (which succeed, which fail?)
- 17 passed (over 12,000 failed)
- iThree categories: (1) Broadening the electorate; (2) Extending civil liberties; (3) More direct connection between voters and representatives
-
Police power of state governments
Authority that states have to regulate safety, health, and morality
-
Local governments as "creatures of the state"
Can be created or abolished
-
Expressed/Enumerated powers
Listed Powers
-
Supremacy clause
- Resolve all debates and conflict between federal government and state governments
- Laws passed by the national government are "the supreme law of the land"
-
Reservation clause/reserved powers
- 10th Amendment
- "powers not delegated to the US by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the states are reserved to the states respectively or to the people"
- If no power given or taken away, power to state government
-
Full faith and credit clause
Requires that the states normally honor the public acts and judicial decisions that take place in another state
-
Dual federalism/Layer cake federalism
- Separate realms of power
- Everything else to state governments: More powerful
-
McCulloch v. Maryland
McCulloch refuses to pay taxes to state government when he works for federal government (supreme court)
-
Gibbons v. Ogden
- "every species of commercial intercourse"
- "that commerce which concerns more states than one"
-
Wickard v. Filburn
- Filburn farmer in Ohio
- Pass law that limits how much wheat you can grow on your land: Supply demand; Reduce supply of wheat, demand goes up
- Filburn has extra land: Does not sell extra wheat but will feed farm animals; People find out
- Federal government fines him: Pay $120 for his 240 extra bushels of wheat
- If Filburn feeds his animals, not going to buy wheat: Demand goes down so price of wheat will go down and may go down in other states
-
Cooperative federalism/Marble cake federalism
States and federal government work together to succeed: Marble Cake
-
Categorical grants
Money given to state government to implement federal government plan
-
Regulated federalism
- Take away federal money
- Unfunded Mandates
-
Unfunded mandates
regulations or conditions for receiving grants that impose costs on state and local governments for which they are not reimbursed by the federal government
-
New Federalism
- Devolution
- Limits on the Interstate Commerce Clause: US v. Lopez; US v. Morrison
- Block Grants
- Revenue Sharing
-
U.S. v. Lopez
- High school kid brings gun
- People pass own law poses stiff penalties when a student brings a gun to school
- If someone brings a gun, kids scared, makes it hard to learn, hard to graduate, hard to get job, can't purchase things INTERSTATE COMMERCE
- Punished on federal law: Believed Congress did not have authority
- Lopez wins
- There are limits to federal government authority
-
U.S. v. Morrison
- Violence against women
- Crimes against women were not being punished harshly enough
- Allowed women of to sue victimized women in civil court instead of criminal court: If victimized, could sue in civil court for monetary damages based on what they did to you
- If we allow women to commit crime without check, physically and emotional bad
- Virginia Tech: football players rape student: Morrison raped, comes up with different story; Girl sues
- Girl wins
-
Block grants
Money with few strings attached: Money spent on education, health care, prisons; Have to spend money on certain kind of policy
-
Revenue sharing
- More power for federal government over time: Founding Fathers envisioned layered cake but state government had more power
- But states still play an important role
- Recent developments give more power back to states
-
Differences between CA Constitution and US Constitution
- "The perfect example of what a constitution ought not to be."
- Length
- Specificity: Federal: Basic structure of government; State: Basic structure of government AND policy pronouncements; Independent university system; UC given specialized status in Constitution
-
Initiatives in California
- Statutory: Petition signed by 5% of the voters from the last gubernatorial election for statutes - Approximately 450,000 signatures
- Constitutional: Petition signed by 8% of the voters from the last gubernatorial election for amendments - Approximately 700,000 signatures
-
Recalls in California
- To recall a statewide officer: (1) Gather signatures of registered voters equal in number to 12% of the last vote for that office; (2) In five counties, gather signatures equal in number to 1% of that county's vote; (3) Approximately 900,000 signatures
- To recall a legislator: Equal in number to 20% of district vote.
-
Referendum in California (mandatory and optional)
- Mandatory referendum
- 1.Legislature passes and governor signs a proposed constitutional amendment
- 2.50% of voters must approve for constitution to be changed
- Optional referendum ("people's veto")
- 1.Legislature passes and governor signs a law
- 2.Petition signed by 5% of the voters from the last gubernatorial election to have a repeal vote
-
Plural executive
- President needs Secretary of State
- All positions of leadership appointed by President
- Unitary executive
- Positions chosen independently
-
Line item veto
Change amount of funding spent on a particular part of law
-
"The Big Five"
- Governor: Jerry Brown (D)
- Assembly Minority Leader: Connie Conway (R)
- Senate Minority Leader: Bob Dutton (R)
- Assembly Speaker: John Perez (D)
- Senate President: Darrell Steinberg (D)
-
Proposition 11 (2008)
- Gave authority to redistrict maps
- Citizens Redistricting Commission
-
Gerrymandering
- drawn in ways that influence the outcomes of elections
- 99% incumbent reelection rate
- Not a single seat changed party hands between 2004-2008
-
Proposition 13 (1978)
- Dramatically reduced property taxes
- Initiative passed by voters in 1978
- Immediately cut property tax revenue by 57%
- Property taxes now 1% of assessed value in 1975 (or value at most recent sale)
- Cut local government funding: So less money for public education and public safety
- So local governments more dependent on the state government for funding
- Also required 2/3 majority support for all tax increases
-
Proposition 140 (1990)
- Term Limits
- Senate: 2, 4 year terms
- Assembly: 3, 2 year terms
- District boundaries: Pre-2010
- Legislature draws their own boundaries
- Gerrymandering: 99% incumbent reelection rate; Not a single seat changed party hands between 2004-2008
- Post-2010: Proposition 11 (2008) - Citizens Redistricting Commission
-
Reasons for CA budget deficits
- Started with $140 billion
- Typically over $100 billion spent
- Unlike federal government, states must operate with balanced budgets
- This year: $84 billion
- all the politicians want an excuse to be in office so they keep passing budget reform and special interest projects
- welfare and state pensions are a big part of it
- every state employee retires will full benefits, except teachers
- California increases its taxes a lot to pay off the budget deficit but at the same time increases spending so the BUDGET NEVER GETS BALANCED
- it has a bit to do with Republicans and Democrats blocking each other's legislation
-
Reasons why higher education funding typically gets cut
- Because one part uses Prop 13, cut services
- Students don't complain
|
|