-
Mission/Vision Statements
- Key elements of a mission/vision:
- Define the organization’s long-term purpose
- Often includes broad goals and philosophy
- Best if inspirational/motivational
- Communicate organizational priorities to all employees (and stakeholder groups)
- Can influence employee behavior
- Research has shown that when employees know and accept their company’s mission:
- -Turnover is reduced
- -Satisfaction and commitment improves
- The key is effective communication
-
Establishing Objectives
- Types of objectives:
- ◦strategic and financial
- ◦short term and long term
The need for a top-down approach to objective setting
-
Characteristics of “good” objectives
- Realistic/challanging
- Clear/specific
- Time frame
- Measurable
-
The concept of “stretch” objectives
Set goals outside of what the company can do
-
The Strategic Management Process
- Develop Mission and Objectives
- Analyze External Environment and Internal Capabilities
- Formulate Strategy (corporate/business)
- Implement Strategy
- Achieve Competitive Advantage and Assess Performance
-
Three levels of strategy
- Corporate- actions firms take to gain competitive advantage in multiple markets or industries
- Business- actions firsms take to gain competitive advantages in a single market or industry
- Functional
-
Competitive Advantage
- A firm has a competitive advantage when it is able to create more economic value than rivals
- Two forms of competitive advantage:
- Differentiation: customers are willing to pay a premium due to some attribute of a firm’s product/service (Example: Nordstrom)
- Low cost: the firm incurs lower costs in producing/ distributing its product/service (Example: Wal-Mart)
- Competitive advantage should lead to increased profitability
- Economic theory suggests that this should attract increased competition, ultimately making the competitive advantage temporary
- In certain circumstances, the source of the competitive advantage may not be imitable, thus leading to a sustainable competitive advantage
-
Economic value
The difference between the perceived benefits gained by a customer that purchases a firms products or services and the full economic cost of these products or services
-
Sectors of General Environment
- Technological Change
- Dempgraphic Trends
- Cultural Trends
- Economic Climate
- Legal & Political Considerations
- Specific International Events
-
Five Forces Model
- Threat of New Entry
- Threat of Rivalry
- Threat of Substitutions
- Threat of Powerful Suppliers
- Threat of Powerful Buyers
-
Threat of New Entry
- 1.) Economies of Scale- A firms costs fall as a function of its volume of production
- 2.) Product Differentiation- incumbant firms possess brand identification and customer loyalty that potential entrants to not
- 3.) Cost Advantages Indepentent of Scale- proprietary technology, manegerial know-how, favorable access to raw materials, learning curve
- 4.) Government Regulation of Entry
-
Threat of Rivalry
- Attributes of an industry that increase the threat of rivalry:
- 1.) A large number of competing firms that are roughly the same in size
- 2.) Slow industry growth
- 3.) Lack of product differentiation
- 4.) Capacity added in large increments
-
Threat if Powerful Suppliers
- Indicators of the Threat of Suppliers:
- 1.) Suppliers' industry is dominated by a small number of firms
- 2.) Suppliers sell unique or highly differentiated products
- 3.) Suppliers are NOT threatened by substitutes
- 4.) Suppliers threaten forward vertical integration (suppliers become competitors)
- 5.) Firms are NOT important customers for suppliers
-
Threat of Powerful Buyers
- Indicators of Threat of Buyers
- 1.) Number of buyers is small
- 2.) Products sold to buyers are undifferentiated and standard
- 3.) Products sold to buyers are a significant percentage of a buyer's final costs
- 4.) Buyers are NOT entering significant economic profits
- 5.) Buyers threaten backwards vertical integration (Buyers become suppliers)
-
Profitability Ratios
- ROA
- ROE
- Gross Profit Margin
- Earnings Per Share (EPS)
- Price earnings Ratio (p/e)
- Cash flow per share
-
-
Leverage Ratios
- Debt to Assets
- Debt to equity
- Times interest earned
-
Activity Ratios
- Inventory turnover
- Accounts receivable turnover
- Average collection period
-
Return on Assets (ROA)
- Profit after taxes/Total assets (%)
- A measure of return on the total investment in a firm- larger is better
- Used to measure the amount earned on each dollar of assets invested
-
Return on Equity (ROE)
- Profit after taxes/Total stockholders equity (%)
- NI/OE
- NPM x Assets Turnover x Assets/Equity
- NPM= NI/Sales
- Assets t/o= Sales/Total assets
- A measure of return on total equity investment in a firm- larger is better
- Used to measure the amount earned on each dollar of equity
-
Gross Profit Margin
- Sales-COGS/ Sales
- A measure of sales availible to cover operating expenses and still generate a profit
-
Price Earnings Ratio
- Current mkt price/earnings per share
- How much the company is earning per $1 in shares
-
Current Ratio
- Current assets/Current liabilities
- A measure of the ability of a firm to cover its current liabilities with assets that can be converter to cash in the short term (range 2-3 good)
-
Dept to assets
- Debt/assets
- measure of the extent to which debt has financed a firms business activities- higher is greater risk of brankruptcy
-
Times interest earned
Profit before interest and taxes/total interest charges
-
Total Assets turnover
Sales/Total assets
-
Inventory Turnover
- sales/inventory
- measure of the speed at which a firms inventory is turning over
-
Internal Capabilities
- Internal analysis can be thought of as consisting of two interrelated activities:
- 1.Evaluate current performance
- 2.Evaluate current resources/capabilities:
- -Are your current capabilities sufficient for you to execute your strategy?
- -Do your current capabilities enable you to capitalize on opportunities or form the basis for a sustainable competitive advantage?
-
Implications: Resource-Based View
- The entire organization must take responsibility for building a competitive advantage
- Relying only on imitation leads to parity
- Socially-complex resources (like corporate cultures) can often be the most likely source of a sustainable competitive advantage
- It’s often easier to develop/change the organization (supporting assets) than it is to develop new valuable, rare, and inimitable resources/capabilities
-
Resource-Based View of the Firm
- Resources can be either tangible or intangible
- ◦Tangible: financial, physical, etc.
- ◦Intangible: knowledge, culture, reputation, etc.
- Firms must compare their resource positions to their current and potential rivals
- Resources or capabilities (combinations of resources used to accomplish a task) form the basis of competitive advantage
-
Capabilities
A subset of a firms resources and are defined as the tangible and intangible assets that enable a firm to take full advantage of other resources it controls
-
Distinctive Competencies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA) (VRIO)
- Valuable
- Rare
- Inimitable (hard to copy)
- Organization (supporting assets)
-
Question of Value
- Does a resource or capability enable a firm to exploit an environmental opportunity and/or nuetralize an environmental threat?
- Value chain- a set of business activities in which it engages to develop, produce, and market its products or services
-
Question of Rarity
Is a resource currently controlled by only a small number of competing firms?
-
Question of Imitability
- Do firms without a resource face a cost disadvantage in obtaining or devoping it compared to firms that already possess it?
- Why might it be costly to imitate firms?
- Unique historical conditions
- Legal barriers
- casual ambiguity- firms may not understand the relationship between the resources and capabilities controlled by a firm and that firms competitive advantage
- Socal complexity- a lot of social interactions, related to causal ambiguity
-
Question of Organization
Are a firms other policies and procedures organized to support the exploitation of its valuable, rare, and costly-to-imitate resources?
-
Generic Competitive Strategies
- In business strategy, firms generally follow one of four generic competitive strategies
- Determined by a firm’s choices along two dimensions
- ◦competitive advantage (Differentiation or Cost leader)
- ◦competitive scope/market segmentation (Broad or Focus)
Strategies termed “generic” because they apply in almost every industry
- Broad Cost Leadership- Wal-Mart
- Focus Cost Leadership- Life Uniform
- Broad Differentiation- Macys
- Focus Differentiation- Gymboree
-
Focused Strategies
The key is to outperform a broadly-oriented rival in the segment being targeted
- The basis for competitive advantage is either:
- ◦Lower costs than competitors serving the segment
- ◦Better serve targeted customers’ needs
- Examples of focused competitors include:
- -Taco Bell in fast food (low cost)Ritz-Carlton in hotels (differentiation)
-
The pros and cons of a focus strategy
- Focusing works best when:
- ◦Large target segment
- ◦Segment is “insulated”
- ◦Customers’ needs within the industry vary widely
- ◦No one else is focusing on your segment
- Focusing is especially risky when:
- ◦Needs in segment start to match rest of industry
- ◦Size of target segment shrinks
- ◦Broadly-oriented rivals can meet segment’s needs
-
Sources of Cost Advantages
- 1.) Size differences and economies of scale
- 2.) Size differences and diseconomies of scale
- 3.) Experience differences and learning-curve economies
- 4.) Differential low cost access to productive inputs
- 5.) Technological advantages independent of scale
- 6.) Policy Choices
-
How do firms become cost leaders?
- Develop economies of scale
- Avoid diseconomies of scale
- Follow the experience/learning curve
- Access low cost inputs
- Make smart technological choices
- Effective managerial practices
- Make astute product policy choices
- Rarity?
- Implementing effective managerial practices may be more rare. The experience curve is hard for competitors to compete with.
-
Cost Leadership and the Five Forces
- Rivalry: Why would a rational competitor start a price war against the cost leader?
- Buyer Power: Buyers have limited leverage against the cost leader.
- Supplier Power: Cost leaders tend to purchase standardized inputs in large quantities.
- Threat of New Entry: New entrants often cannot afford to enter at a size to match the cost leader’s scale economies.
- Substitute Products: While still susceptible, probably less so than average competitors.
-
Implementing Cost Leadership
Use a functional organization structure with a small centralized staff and few reporting layers
- Use managerial control systems that:
- ◦emphasize quantitative cost control targets
- ◦closely supervise labor and other inputs
- ◦build a culture that focuses on low costs
Reward cost savings at all organization levels
|
|